Title: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: Person Man on November 24, 2008, 01:15:06 AM
(
)
neat, huh? This is 269-269... The house would have given it to Obama.
(
)
neat, huh? This is 269-269... The house would have given it to Obama.
(
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that was west of the Missouri
Post by: Lunar on November 24, 2008, 01:17:01 AM
Pretty damn cool.
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: justfollowingtheelections on November 24, 2008, 01:41:33 AM
Obama could have also won without New England, New York and Pennsylvania.
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on November 24, 2008, 01:44:24 AM
The first map is interesting. The second map is inane and pointless...well consider the source.
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 24, 2008, 01:45:19 AM
Kind of cheap giving NE-2 to Obama though.
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: Jacobtm on November 24, 2008, 01:51:56 AM
Another situation: McCain could've won every Kerry state that he ever tried to pick off, and still lost:
(
)
Obama: 270
McCain: 268
(
Obama: 270
McCain: 268
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: Person Man on November 24, 2008, 10:40:12 PM
Another situation: McCain could've won every Kerry state that he ever tried to pick off, and still lost:
()
Obama: 270
McCain: 268
(
Obama: 270
McCain: 268
Iowa?
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: Person Man on November 24, 2008, 10:43:17 PM
The first map is interesting. The second map is inane and pointless...well consider the source.
Oh.... 90% my friend is not 10% my enemy.
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: Lunar on November 25, 2008, 01:52:43 AM
Another situation: McCain could've won every Kerry state that he ever tried to pick off, and still lost:
()
Obama: 270
McCain: 268
(
Obama: 270
McCain: 268
Iowa?
Bush won Iowa in 2004
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: CultureKing on November 25, 2008, 04:00:10 AM
Another situation: McCain could've won every Kerry state that he ever tried to pick off, and still lost:
()
Obama: 270
McCain: 268
(
Obama: 270
McCain: 268
Iowa?
Bush won Iowa in 2004
Did Bush ever try for Oregon or Washington?
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: Jacobtm on November 25, 2008, 03:00:40 PM
Another situation: McCain could've won every Kerry state that he ever tried to pick off, and still lost:
()
Obama: 270
McCain: 268
(
Obama: 270
McCain: 268
Iowa?
Bush won Iowa in 2004
Did Bush ever try for Oregon or Washington?
Dunno, but there were some early numbers out of WA and OR, much like CT and MI, which showed that McCain had a chance.
Title: Re: Obama didn't need any state west of any state that bordered the Missouri R
Post by: minionofmidas on November 25, 2008, 03:15:56 PM
The first map is interesting. The second map is inane and pointless...well consider the source.
Well, trying to be. It's wrong in VA, MI, possibly elsewhere.