|
52
|
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Congressional Elections / Re: POLITICO: No Judd
|
on: March 27, 2013, 10:23:32 pm
|
Why are Democrats relieved by this announcement?
Because she was a terrible candidate. It would have allowed McConnell to run against celebrity culture and "Hollyweird". McConnell has never been particularly popular, and could lose to the right candidate, even in a neutral year. He had a close call in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Report: Gay NFL Player 'Strongly Considers' Coming Out
|
on: March 26, 2013, 06:40:06 pm
|
Tim Tebow is not gay... why would any one say so?
In all the years he was at Florida, he never had a girlfriend, was never romantically associated with anyone, never was seen on a date with anyone (pictures would have been taken). There were 10,000 girls at least on UF's campus who would have gone one with him, and he apparently never even tried. Then, same thing at Denver, and the same thing in New York**. It's like the Fermi Paradox. If he's straight, why isn't there a shred of evidence? He may be asexual, but he's probably gay. Tebow is the only NFL player prominent enough to make a huge splash if he came out, but also with a homophobic enough fanbase to actually upset most of his fans. ** - OK, se was briefly romantically associated with some rich Catholic hieress last fall, but that was "over' in less than a week and they never were seen together in public, so it all appears to just have been a Huffington Post rumor. Yes but I think part of the reason of that is because he is probably trying to save himself for marriage. He probably doesn't want to risk having sex before he is married or something like that, but to be fair to him as I am a fan, I could imagine the field day the atheists would have with him if they found out about some affair he was having. People who are really saving themselves for marriage are normally actively looking for someone to marry, and for this reason they usually marry young, often right after high school or college. Otherwise, they're usually using it to rationalize something else...
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Hillary Clinton...
|
on: March 26, 2013, 06:36:35 pm
|
The party will NEVER forgive her if she doesn't run. The poll numbers she's getting in red states don't come around very often.
And I'm sure she hasn't forgiven the party for how terribly they treated her in 2008. She owes NOTHING to the party; the party owes everything to her. Despite dragging out the bitter primary long after it became clear she couldn't win, Obama was still magnanimous enough to name her Secretary of State, and she was the best Secretary of State in decades.
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: ...and now Tester.
|
on: March 26, 2013, 06:16:17 pm
|
Hmmm. McCaskill just announced her support, and now Tester does. Both were just reelected to the Senate from mostly conservative states. Now they both come out when they're safe in the Senate for 6 years. What a coincidence!
Actually, I don't begrudge them too much for not coming out in their reelection bids. I'm glad they won, and that they are still in the Senate.
Montana and Missouri will both have majorities in support of gay marriage by 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Congressional Elections / Re: John Barrow probably in (senate)
|
on: March 24, 2013, 12:09:13 pm
|
Impossible for him to become a republican. He would be primaried easily! I agree with Miles, it should be easier for him in 2020. Except if he got a primary challenge. But I suppose he's not stupid, he will become less conservative in the future if elected
What happened to Parker Griffith sends a stern warning to Southern Democrats that it's basically impossible for a federal officeholder to switch parties and be accepted by the Republican primary electorate in this day and age, unlike how it was in the 80s and 90s.
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: GOP legislators in MI, PA, & WI are pushing for proportional EC allocation
|
on: March 09, 2013, 06:56:21 pm
|
I think these bills should go through. Honestly.....the real Pennsylvania should have a say in choosing the President, and not just Philadelphia which basically dictates the whole state. Same with Detroit/MI etc. I think it would be very fair.
Republicans typically do not ever like "rocking the boat," though -- and most likely won't follow through on the bills
Does "the real America" mean White America? Does "the real Pennsylvania" mean the white population of Pennsylvania? Bullhist on urban America being less "American". People are where the concrete is -- not where the cow pastures and cotton fields are. Sarah Palin made her infamous 'Real America' speech 50 miles from Columbus, Ohio in which she castigated urban America as modern equivalents of Sodom and Gomorrah in contrast to 'innocent, virtuous, rural' America. Incorrect. She actually made the "Real America" speech in Guilford County, NC, which in turn voted for Obama in both 2008 and 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Jon Tester and Gay Marriage
|
on: March 09, 2013, 10:47:17 am
|
1. The Democratic Party supports gay marriage. 2. Jon Tester is against gay marriage. 3. Jon Tester has a gay son.
The fact that I had no idea this was the case and it got zero media coverage during the election is the reason conservatives won't watch anything but Fox News. If this were a Republican, every time I opened Gawker I'd be getting headlines like "Jon Tester Won't Let His Gay Son Get Married." To be fair, while many Democrats have been wrong on this issue or taken cowardly/moderate hero positions on it, you guys really did it to yourselves by making opposition to gay marriage the centerpiece of your 2004 campaign. People still haven't forgotten about that, especially people with lots of gay friends, like the people who write Gawker. In any event, the writing is clearly on the wall, notwithstanding the position of one Democratic politician in one conservative state. In 10 years, no Democratic politician of note will oppose gay marriage. In 20 years, no Republican politician of note outside the South will oppose gay marriage. I wouldn't even rule out Tester having a conversion on this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|