|
2
|
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Congressional Elections / What happened in Mississippi?
|
on: November 12, 2008, 06:13:22 am
|
|
Maybe the final Rasmussen poll was just accurate showing Wicker leading 54%-43%, but almost every other poll indicated a close result in the special election. True, I predicted Wicker would defeat Musgrove 52%-47%, but I thought that both he and Obama would higher than they did. Was it simply that blacks were not very organized in getting out the vote (Not that they didn't vote, but their overall effect wasn't maximized). Or was the infusion of RNC cash enough? Basically, why did Wicker beat Musgrove by much more than one would have thought? As far as I know, no one predicted a 12% victory.
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Congressional Elections / Re: Top House Targets in 2010
|
on: November 10, 2008, 09:41:23 am
|
Jim Marshall, Parker Griffith and Bobby Bright should worry about 2010. They definitely have to be some of the most vulnerable.
If Griffith can build up a personal following in the rural parts of his district he might be alright (Cramer was in the same situation in much of the '90's). I don't know about Bright. Marshall is a dead man walking. I suppose there is a precedent for a conservative, rural Democrat to hold Griffith's seat. The thing about Bobby Bright is that he managed to win his seat even as McCain must have been defeating Obama pretty heavily in it. I know he was helped by Smith endorsing him over Love but still, I wonder if he might be alright in an off-year. And Marshall is battle-hardened but 2010 could be bad for him - however, by then he will have been in that seat for some time and might be able to pull it out. Anyway, I'd still call them three of the most vulnerable Democratic Congressman going into 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Congressional Elections / Georgia Senate Run-off: Chambliss vs. Martin
|
on: November 10, 2008, 08:00:25 am
|
|
Both candidates are now apparently preparing for a run-off on 2nd December. The race should be close given the result earlier this month and Chambliss reportedly has both John McCain and Sarah Palin coming into campaign for him, while Martin has solicited the aid of Obama. Although Chambliss must be favoured, I think given the current political climate in Georgia (Obama didn't win the state as some hoped, but he still significantly narrowed Bush's 2004 margin and enfranchised many new black and young voters) Martin could have a chance. If white turnout is down, and eh can succeed in getting blacks to the polls with Obama's help - he has a chance. What do we think?
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Election Archive / 2008 Elections / Re: Predict NC and MO
|
on: November 03, 2008, 05:33:04 pm
|
I'm guessing Obama will barely win NC and MO.
I agree. If you believe in swing-state momentum and that all the dominoes fall in the direction, blah blah, then Obama should sweep North Carolina, Missouri and Indiana - should do anyway. My prediction: NORTH CAROLINA - 49% (D) Obama 48% (R) McCain 2% Others MISSOURI - 50% (D) Obama 47% (R) McCain 2% Others INDIANA - 49% (D) Obama 48% (R) McCain 2% Others Something like that anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Election Archive / 2008 Elections / Re: Georgia
|
on: November 02, 2008, 04:30:05 pm
|
|
My prediction:
GEORGIA PRESIDENT - 50% (R) McCain 47% (D) Obama 2% Others
GEORGIA SENATE - 49% (R) Chambliss 46% (D) Martin 4% (L) Buckley
|
|
|
|
|
|