Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 24, 2016, 07:05:36 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Election 2016 predictions are now open!.

  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 718
1  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Assange outs gay men in Saudi Arabia, also personal info of rape/abuse victims on: Today at 06:19:07 am

...and always has been.
2  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Sanders Successor Group Adds Jeff Weaver, 8/13 Staff Resign on: Today at 06:18:36 am
Can't say this surprises me... at all.
3  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Racism and talk of religious war: Trump staff's online posts on: Today at 04:00:44 am
Clinton's irrational hate-b***r for Hillary knows no bounds.
4  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Clinton address in Reno to focus on Trump's ties to Alt-Right/White Nationalism on: Today at 01:45:22 am
The problem with the alt-right is their nihilism and their stupid memes. Otherwise, they're just fine.

Something tells me you own a copy of Mein Kampf.
Is that bad?

... ah ha? Do go on.
5  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Your response to this result on: Today at 01:17:34 am
Wouldn't be surprised, relieved that it's not Trump, worried that it is Clinton.

You're a Republican again? Smiley

Yeah, registered as D mostly to temporarily protest Trump's nomination, also cause I wanted to vote for Murphy lol, early voted today.
Welcome home! I sure hope for the sake of our party we nominate someone who is far less divisive, and far more inclusive.

You've a long way to go before the base of your party will nominate someone that can win over them AND, you know, the rest of America. Plus, it's not just GOPers and it's not just personality... it's policy.
6  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: BREAKING: HILLARY CAUGHT DELETING MORE E-MAILS on: Today at 01:16:20 am
Look at the way she's hunched -- from my many years on health forums, I can safely say that she is in the middle of suffering some sort of short-circuiting. (note the bright electrical light coming from the top of her head). Her green ring is controlled by an aid nearby; she can no longer move her fingers, so the ring applies a small shock that allows her to move the mouse and click when necessary. Sad!

I completely missed that! You're right. SAD!

Why isn't she standing upright, clearly she's got some degenerative disorder...
7  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Your response to this result on: August 23, 2016, 11:20:01 pm
Champagne and utter relief.
8  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Hillary may have some sort of a chance at winning every state on: August 23, 2016, 10:45:01 pm
Have you hit your head?
9  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: SC-The Feldman Group (D): Tied in 4-way, Trump +2 in Head to Head on: August 23, 2016, 08:59:40 pm
Response to this poll by the Chair of the SC Republican Party:

Matt Moore ‏@MattMooreSC  15m15 minutes ago
Bogus "commissioned by" poll. Internal polls across SC show @realDonaldTrump easily defeating @HillaryClinton here.

OK - put up or shut up, release your internal polling.
10  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Who will be the Presidential Debate moderators? on: August 23, 2016, 08:30:48 pm
I want Candy just to f*** with the GOP.
11  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Clinton/Trump Outperform the polls? on: August 23, 2016, 08:16:44 pm
Clinton +2 to allow for ground-game and Hispanic under-polling.
12  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Clinton address in Reno to focus on Trump's ties to Alt-Right/White Nationalism on: August 23, 2016, 06:24:07 pm
A white person claiming colourblindness is one of the most ignorant, tone deaf, and ridiculously self-congratulatory things I can think of.

This is more ed up than anything seriously has written in this thread.
Nothing wrong wth the post.  You post so much sh**t that you have no room to talk.

Look who's talking.
The same is said of yourself.

So you admit you are a bad poster?
Eh, some think I am, just like you.  Only difference, the people who think that for me are usually sh**t tier themselves, so really doesn't matter.  For you, many more think this. 

If you admit you are a bad poster than you have no business lecturing others I'm afraid...

Probably better than thinking you're a good poster and, well... not be.
13  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: MANY DONORS TO CLINTON FOUNDATION MET WITH HER AT STATE on: August 23, 2016, 06:18:13 pm


This should be posted on all of your threads.

Clinton supporters after every Clinton "scandal"

Yes. And I wonder why?

On issue, donors might have asked for stuff, very few actually met with her, and no one got anything.

14  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: MO-Monmouth: Trump +1 on: August 23, 2016, 06:14:14 pm
I've arguing this for ages now, MO is NOT five miles to the right of Kentucky that  people around here seemed to have been arguing.

Romney did so well, thanks to suburban whites turning away from Obama. I see no reason why MO cannot be an extremely tight race considering those voters are turned off by Trump.
15  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: Roanoke College: Clinton +16 in Virginia on: August 23, 2016, 07:04:12 am
I would love this to be true, but... nah.

Clinton is doing extremely well here, so it's not so ridiculous... but it's more like Clinton +10-ish
16  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: NBC/Survey Monkey: National Clinton +8 (2-way), +5 (4-way) on: August 23, 2016, 05:27:40 am
I think taking the average of the two is accurate, since Johnson/Stein numbers will eventually fade and probably half of it will go to Trump/Clinton or stay home. So Clinton up 6 to 7 is what I would say.

I think that's fair.
17  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic WV Governor Candidate: "I can't support Clinton" on: August 22, 2016, 08:43:10 pm
It's WV and he wants to win a state that HRC will lose by 30%...
18  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: What impact will the newly discovered emails will have on Clinton? on: August 22, 2016, 08:40:18 pm
Limited to none. But it is her single biggest liability.
19  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Trump Cancels Portland Oregon Fundraiser and Rally on: August 22, 2016, 05:09:37 pm
Good call. Trump should avoid the heavily left cities after disrupters assaulted and spit on donors in Minneapolis last week at an event that wasn't even public. The violent protesters are just looking for an opportunity to make a scene.

Lol, another horrible lime green.
20  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: What happened? Hillary's approval rating at 60%+ in early 2013 on: August 22, 2016, 05:33:27 am
Long story, yes. She wasn't running for anything yet. It's a pretty simple issue, Hillary's favourables drop when she's seeking election and rise once people remember she's actually good at her job.
21  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Colin Powell not taking hillary's statements lightly- ups his attack on: August 22, 2016, 04:09:14 am
The fake outrage is strong in this one.

They're taking what they can get.
22  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Can Trump win CT? on: August 21, 2016, 09:33:05 pm
And why or why not?
It's possible, but not likely. I am sure Q will poll its home state at some point.

It is not possible.
Of course it's possible. There is a model for a state-wide win in Connecticut by Republicans.  It's not likely that Trump will execute it.

Republicans haven't won CT since 1988.

MI & PA also.

And neither are in play, so what is your point?

My point is that Trump will win where most are not expecting.

On what basis?

The basis that he is not a conventional politician.

That... I can't with this. I think you need a new hobby.

I think you need to reevaluate the candidate who you are supporting as does everyone else.

I don't think Hillary is perfect, but I've never felt the repulsion toward a candidate and campaign as I do Donald Trump.

This guy's a troll, not the well meaning naive lad so many seem to think he is. He's not worth feeding.

Yeah, it's pretty clear now. Onto ignore you go and I urge others to do the same.
23  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Can Trump win CT? on: August 21, 2016, 09:28:58 pm
And why or why not?
It's possible, but not likely. I am sure Q will poll its home state at some point.

It is not possible.
Of course it's possible. There is a model for a state-wide win in Connecticut by Republicans.  It's not likely that Trump will execute it.

Republicans haven't won CT since 1988.

MI & PA also.

And neither are in play, so what is your point?

My point is that Trump will win where most are not expecting.

On what basis?

The basis that he is not a conventional politician.

That... I can't with this. I think you need a new hobby.
24  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Can Trump win CT? on: August 21, 2016, 09:25:15 pm
And why or why not?
It's possible, but not likely. I am sure Q will poll its home state at some point.

It is not possible.
Of course it's possible. There is a model for a state-wide win in Connecticut by Republicans.  It's not likely that Trump will execute it.

Republicans haven't won CT since 1988.

MI & PA also.

And neither are in play, so what is your point?

My point is that Trump will win where most are not expecting.

You really need to temper your expectations... it's called hope-dicting.

No, because Connecticut is a solidly Democratic state, and Trump is a terrible candidate. You can pretty much rule out any state Obama won by more than 6 or 7.

Okay.. Why is he holding rallies there then?

Because the Trump campaign has no idea what they're doing and Donald wants to get home for dinner.

And why or why not?
It's possible, but not likely. I am sure Q will poll its home state at some point.

It is not possible.
Of course it's possible. There is a model for a state-wide win in Connecticut by Republicans.  It's not likely that Trump will execute it.

Thanks for the great input as usual.



It's so sweet that you two have each other.
25  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Trump courting American voters in Israel; estimated 300,000 voters on: August 21, 2016, 09:17:10 pm
I normally don't respond as I am about to here.  There are lots of folks I find obnoxious here that I will suffer and respond to as factually as I can.  But judging from your last few posts, you may be the most over-the-top irrational in this forum, regardless of party or ideology.

Hogwash.  What's over-the-top is plotting to disenfranchise large numbers of people.  What's irrational is cheerleading the candidacy of a man who tries to manipulate the electorate through fear and bigotry.  What's patriotic is standing strong against hate, against voter disenfranchisement, and against the politics of fear and division.

Because bull**** about Hillary, something, something.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 718


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines