Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2014, 04:19:27 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 353 354 355 356 357 [358] 359 360 361 362 363 ... 411
8926  Forum Community / Forum Community Election Match-ups / Re: Battle of the Europeans on: July 18, 2007, 03:44:04 pm
*sigh* I'm never in these polls (Read: +1 Post count. Tongue )

Anyway I'm stuck between Gustaf and Jas, so I'll be a proud patriotic Irishman and vote for Gustaf.
8927  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / International Elections / Re: Poland may face early elections on: July 18, 2007, 02:54:47 pm
Wow.. good news at last.
8928  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Past Election What-ifs (US) / Re: Harding/Cooldige vs. Davis/Bryan vs. LaFollette/Wheeler-1924 on: July 18, 2007, 02:25:49 pm
Harding Still wins easily. Iirc the scandals only emerged after his death. If I'm wrong or they emerge anyway he would still win but not as comfortably, but the 20s were Republicans for anyone else.

The Democrats though might have nominated McAdoo if they thought they had a real good chance of winning. And the Progressives might not have split.
8929  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Flynt Ready to Implicate Another Senator on: July 18, 2007, 02:19:47 pm
Perhaps it might be a woman?

Just Speculating, that's all. Tongue

EDIT: The real money should be someone rather well known and a "family values" man. So not Kennedy, that wouldn't be surprising to Larry Flynt. I don't know every senator (as I'm not American) but what I do know about my money is on Jim Bunning.
8930  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / International Elections / Re: Paris 2008 on: July 18, 2007, 02:17:24 pm
It still reads "Paris 2007" for all the non-title posts in this thread, Al.

In other words this thread is a failure. Wink
8931  Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Which party would the previous poster have voted for in the past 5 UK elections? on: July 17, 2007, 08:03:35 pm
Labour
Labour
Labour
Labour
OMG Satan Party - The Greens (or protest vote, or whatever.)
8932  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Who is more corrupt? on: July 17, 2007, 08:02:43 pm
Clearly anyone who is obsessed with WalterMitty. Which one of them is those?
8933  General Politics / International General Discussion / Re: How are David Cameron's chances? on: July 17, 2007, 08:01:22 pm
If Cameron becomes PM then it will be confirmed without a shadow of doubt that admen and media marketeers truly run this planet.

(P.S: He wrote alot of that oh-so-liberal-document: the 2005 conservative party manifesto. So clearly privatizing the NHS and letting the darkies in are not issues with him.......

He has a chance clearly, more so than Hague, IDS *snorts* and Howard ever did. Perhaps because some suburban idiots like Cameron because he's OOOOOohhh Shiny and slick and brand new or perhaps because labour is just boring. Either way actual politics has nothing really to do with it.)
8934  General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Would you say the United States is a reactionary or progressive country? on: July 17, 2007, 07:46:39 pm
I blame the South.

Don't we all, man. Don't we all.

Clearly the dead men of the Old CSA are having a laugh as we speak.
8935  Forum Community / Off-topic Board / Re: What's the last movie you've seen? on: July 17, 2007, 07:40:18 pm
I just saw CSA too - the problem here is that it doesn't try to portray a true alternative history but rather make political points. And by failing to do the former it fails in the latter - a comic idea of alternative history where only the names change. Yawn...

Though some of the facts shown near the end are truly amazing.
8936  General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Would you say the United States is a reactionary or progressive country? on: July 17, 2007, 07:36:11 pm
any country that voted for Bush twice struggles with me to be considered "Progressive".

Once, man. Once.

Okay fair enough, but you had a chance to rectify your error (or rather the Supreme Court's error) and... you blew it.
8937  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Election What-ifs? / Re: Betty Ford vs. Rosaylln Carter on: July 17, 2007, 07:21:37 pm
People complaining about gporter's spelling are becoming more annoying and obnoxious than Gporter ever was. It's clear by now that English isn't his first language or that he has some difficulty in comprehension (Dyslexic, maybe?).. or he is just winding us up.

I'm more dissapointed in the fact that nothing he ever posts seems particulary interesting.
8938  Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Who would win a fight? on: July 17, 2007, 07:14:46 pm
Lets make this interesting...

Mike Naso, John Engle, or GPorter

Oh, in a case match.

Case match? If by that you mean Cage match. I think we should lock the cage and run away and forget who wins (who would be John Engle btw, not that anyone would care by then.)

Gully Foyle's Combined Post Count vs The living embodiment of every forumers paranoia and hate in one person.
8939  Election Archive / 2008 Elections / Re: Hawaii going Republican? (Note: This isn't what I think) on: July 17, 2007, 07:11:23 pm
obviously f thompson would win hawaii by a large margin.

thompson would:

1. protect us from all of the evildoers, including illegal mexicans (who may have....drugs)
2. relieve the tax burden for the suffering top 2% of americans.
3.  get america right with the lord.

why wouldnt hawaiins want that?

Don't forget the Gays man, it's all about the gays.
8940  General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Would you say the United States is a reactionary or progressive country? on: July 17, 2007, 07:10:29 pm
It's Progressively Reactionary I think. Whatever it is right now I doubt it's Reactionarily Progressive. (Perhaps that describe "Limousine Liberals" well, no?)

Of course are far too simple terms (as well as being very leading..) but any country that voted for Bush twice struggles with me to be considered "Progressive".
8941  General Discussion / History / Re: Who was America's worst President? (fair and balanced version) on: July 17, 2007, 07:07:18 pm
Why the consensus around Buchanan? He was merely a corrupt unimaginative (well, a slave owner...) bungler in a position way out of his league - his generations Harding but in a much more crucial period. But he didn't use his position for evil - unlike some other Presidents I've named.
8942  Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Which party would the previous poster have voted for in the past 5 UK elections? on: July 17, 2007, 07:05:04 pm
1987 - Alliance
1992 - Conservative
1997 - Labour
2001 - Labour
2005 - Lib Dems

God Knows..
8943  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / International Elections / Re: Ireland Election 2007 on: July 17, 2007, 07:03:55 pm
Somehow I managed to ignore this until now.. I spend too much time on the Internets. Anyway no real shock. I'm glad McKenna did better than the anti-dealers the last time the Greens voted.

Anyone now in doubt that the PeeDees are now finished? Every second day I keep hearing "OMG GREALISH REJOIN FF OMG!!11" and Harney is of course retiring. And Colm O' Gorman is based in Wexford (not and never was PD terriority) and most of their other 'big names' have retired back to their law library or cushy jobs working of that most unprivilidged segment of Irish society - Construction Firms...
8944  General Discussion / History / Re: Who was America's worst President? (fair and balanced version) on: July 17, 2007, 03:32:26 pm
I'm leaning towards McKinley. (Who isn't on the poll amazingly. Out of those Wilson, Bush the Younger, Nixon and Jackson are all contenders. Even Adams the Elder too but in a lesser way.)
8945  Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Guess who the previous poster would've voted for in the last 5 pres. primari on: July 17, 2007, 03:30:23 pm
1988: Dukakis
1992: Clinton
1996: Nader
2000: Nader
2004: Kerry

Did I get any right?

No.

As for you, AkSaber (All Republicans):
2004: Write-In
2000: McCain
1996: Alexander
1992: Bush
1988: Dole
8946  Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Guess who the previous poster would've voted for in the last 5 pres. primaries on: July 17, 2007, 03:08:42 pm
2004: Wes Clark (Dunno why.. seems a better fit than the others)
2000: John McCain
1996: Arlon Spector
1992: R: Bush D: Tsongas
1988: Simon

Just a Guess *shrugs*.
8947  Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: would you rather have your son or daughter... on: July 17, 2007, 02:18:39 pm
Neither.

Though I voted for Mikey Burgers.
8948  Election Archive / 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign / Re: Obama Girl vs. Giuliani Girl on: July 16, 2007, 07:19:52 pm
While these ads are ridiculously funny, it is sad to see that this is what the campaign for the Presidency is reduced to.


Not really. The campaign is only in July.. that is the july one year before the election. Only mentally retarded chipmunks would vote on the basis of these ads. I hope so anyway. It's called "having a laugh".

I know it's called "having a laugh" however, this is the type of stuff that gains the attention of the public in this country. This is the stuff they pay attention to. I know we're in July but wait until it is October of next year. We'll see even more of this and the general public won't have a firm grasp on who the candidates really are, what they stand for, what the issues are, etc.

That's because many of the candidates don't have a firm grasp on who they are, never mind what they stand for and as for the issues... hahahaha.
8949  Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Guess who the previous poster would've voted for in last 5 elections on: July 16, 2007, 07:17:46 pm
How about

Dukakis
Perot
Perot
Nader
Cobb

Yeah... Something like that. Though If Eugene McCarthy was on the ballot in my state in 1988 and I would vote for him.

Anyway for you:
All Democrats.

---Skip me----
8950  Election Archive / 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign / Re: Obama Girl vs. Giuliani Girl on: July 16, 2007, 07:14:50 pm
While these ads are ridiculously funny, it is sad to see that this is what the campaign for the Presidency is reduced to.


Not really. The campaign is only in July.. that is the july one year before the election. Only mentally retarded chipmunks would vote on the basis of these ads. I hope so anyway. It's called "having a laugh".
Pages: 1 ... 353 354 355 356 357 [358] 359 360 361 362 363 ... 411


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines