Four sandwiches's worth of ground beef alone is like 800-1000. Even if Bushie used very lean ground beef, that's still over 600. Four buns is 480 calories. Four servings of sloppy joe mix is about 150. Plus 160 calories of chips. His dinner was at the very least 1400 calories and probably closer to 1700 or 1800.
Even if he had eaten only 1200 calories, sloppy joes are basically just unrefined carbs, sugary sauce, and fatty meat. And more fat and processed carbs in the potato chips. This is not a healthy diet. At all.
I read the nutrition labels on each item. I know how many calories I had.
Anyway, does it really matter at this point? I still lost 2 pounds as a result of the 4 sloppy joes. I guess if I had starved myself by having just one tiny sandwich, I could have lost 3-4 pounds. There is absolutely no use or no reason to keep bashing me over the head for a dinner choice when I actually benefited from it. Unless, of course, you want to attack for the sake of attacking, which is mostly what this is all about.
There were nutrition labels on the beef? That said four servings of beef were only 300 calories? Did you put like a teaspoon of beef on each sandwich?
Of course it f[inks]ing matters, if you don't want to die before you're 50. If you're okay with dying before you're fifty, go ahead, continue to eat four sloppy joes for dinner as part of your weight loss diet.
You know I'm not Inks, you know I've been one of the people in this thread defending you and trying to give you advice. But you're being ridiculous. Stop pretending you benefited from eating a family's dinner's worth of food for dinner last night, and stop pretending that not changing your habits at all is a weight-loss diet.
Show Posts
