Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2013, 07:57:43 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 [1993] 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 ... 2040
49801  General Politics / International General Discussion / Re:Major British Conservative tells Americans that they have to vote Democrat. on: July 11, 2004, 11:19:38 am
Goldwater,

The British definition of "conservative" differs from the American one. You are applying your own cultural interpretation of political terminology onto another country.

But maybe you are simply trying to cause a fuss over something as pedantic as semantics to divert attention from the main subject of this thread....? Wink
What should be the point of that - who cares what El Portillo says?
49802  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Election What-ifs? / Re:Clinton/Buchanan/Perot 1992 on: July 11, 2004, 11:17:25 am
If I remember correctly both Buchanan and Perot were largely campaigning against NAFTA. If Buchanan had won the nomination, Perot might not even have run. Clinton would have won.
49803  General Politics / Political Debate / Re:Smoking Bans on: July 11, 2004, 11:11:23 am
My View Part Two: Nobody can force you to go to a restaraunt that allows smoking.
Unless every restaurant does...Which is true in most parts of Europe.

Nobody can force you to go to a restaraunt, as an adult anyways.
Yeah, but that may mean I can't go to a restaurant/bar/cafe/whatever at all. Now, I don't have a problem with that, but I do know people who do.
49804  General Politics / Political Debate / Re:Electoral Voting on: July 11, 2004, 11:08:40 am
I favor electoral voting.

1) If there were ever to come a perennially strong third party and the vote were to be as evenly split three ways as it has been in the past with a two-way race it could cause gridlock.

2) If we were to go to a popular vote system, there would very likely be an increase in election fraud on the part of all parties in power in various states to make the majorities larger than they actually were.

There's actually more incentive for fraud now, under the Electoral College, because there is a greater chance that a small amount of vote fraud in a few key swing states can decide the election. The popular vote nationwide is less likely to be close enough that fraud could matter. But the electoral vote is more likely to be affected by fraud in key swing states.
Exactly true.
49805  Election Archive / 2004 U.S. Presidential Election / Re:Newsweek says Bush 53% / Kerry 44% on: July 11, 2004, 11:06:03 am
It's closely related to just what the two parties have put up in the field of running mates recently...not necessarily how "good" these people were as running mates but what kind of people they were. The two parties clearly do have different strategies there. The Republican Veeps looked, er, less like potential presidents.
I mean: Who really believes that Cheney might be a president one day - and who believed it before he picked himself as his ward's running mate? (Sorry, couldn't resist...)
Who saw Kemp as a man with a future?
I know some people must have believed Quayle might make a president, but not many.
Now compare Gore or Edwards, or even Lieberman or Bentsen though they aren't in the same league.
49806  Questions and Answers / Presidential Election Process / Re:presidential candidate election newbie questions on: July 11, 2004, 10:43:08 am
Debs ran from prison in 1920.
49807  Atlas Fantasy Elections / Atlas Fantasy Elections / Re:A few announcments... on: July 11, 2004, 10:39:59 am
I will be home for all of July and probably all of August as well, though I will be living during this period... Wink
Or so you hope! Smiley
49808  General Politics / International General Discussion / Re:The Bilingual Belt on: July 11, 2004, 10:21:02 am
Interesting trend... with the exception of Acadie-Bathurst, the Bilingual ridings not in Quebec the Liberals win the Franco vote and lose the Anglo vote, while in Quebec it's the other way round.
Another example of that "minorities vote leftwing" thing we had elsewhere.
Or maybe the Liberals are just seen in Canada as the all-Canadian party.
49809  General Politics / Political Debate / Re:Smoking Bans on: July 11, 2004, 10:19:11 am
If you go into a bar, expect smoke!!!  I'm a "drinking only" smoker.  I'm going to have to go with the Republicans on this one!  However in restaurants there should be separate rooms for smokers and non-smokers with air tight compartments.

I don't smoke, but I'd still choose to hang out in the "smoking" room. The smokers are much more fun than the anti-smoking crowd.
That does tend to be true, yes.
49810  General Politics / Political Debate / Re:Smoking Bans on: July 11, 2004, 10:16:47 am
My View Part Two: Nobody can force you to go to a restaraunt that allows smoking.
Unless every restaurant does...Which is true in most parts of Europe.
49811  General Politics / Political Debate / Re:Smoking Bans on: July 11, 2004, 10:14:09 am
What would you all say to a system where businesses were given some sort of financial incentive to ban smoking but not required too. Maybe some sort of tax break. Also a requirement for all establishments where smoking is allowed to clearly display this at the entrance?
I could live with that.
49812  General Politics / Political Debate / Re:Smoking Bans on: July 11, 2004, 10:12:00 am
I do not use any tobacco products, but I strongly advocate your right to use them in establishments where the owner of the property allows you to. Unlike the general public, I realize that second hand smoke is not nearly as dangerous as the general public has assumed it to be at the prodding of mass media.

So my relative is alive and well then?
Yes.
49813  General Politics / Political Debate / Re:Smoking Bans on: July 11, 2004, 10:10:57 am
I both smoke (not cigarettes)
What have you been smoking, man? Smiley
49814  General Politics / Political Debate / Re:Smoking Bans on: July 11, 2004, 10:09:16 am
Smoking bans annoy me, even though I don't smoke anymore, but it's not property rights whose violation bothers me.
49815  General Discussion / History / Re:Was the 1876 election stolen? on: July 11, 2004, 10:07:42 am
Of course it was stolen.
Having said that, all 19th century elections the world over would count as extremely fraudulent by European end-of-20th-century standards.
The really bad thing about 1876 is the dirty settlement that ended the crisis.
49816  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / U.S. Presidential Election Results / Re:The Eugene Debs Project on: July 11, 2004, 10:01:05 am
So when will Debs stonghold Oklahoma be up?
49817  Questions and Answers / The Atlas / Re:Party Colors on: July 11, 2004, 09:59:17 am
Sniff...still waiting for my Other-Oregon avatar...
49818  General Politics / International General Discussion / Re:The Bilingual Belt on: July 10, 2004, 08:27:23 am
Jeanne - Le Ber did go to a recount, but that's already finished. Remains Liberal by seventy votes or so.
St Lambert went Bloc by about 10 points, I guess a gain.
49819  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / U.S. Presidential Election Results / Re:Red and Blue on: July 10, 2004, 08:10:15 am
I don't know the Tyneside suburbs. But I wasn't thinking of ghetto extremes either.
I was just thinking of slabs of concrete like the Frankfurt suburbs of Steinbach or Schwalbach, or Frankfurt's own Nordweststadt. Not affluent (unlike most of Frankfurt's Northwestern suburbs), incredibly dull (like most but not all of them), just "get me out of here" style places.
Now, Mörfelden-Walldorf or Raunheim, to the Southwest, also kind of suburban, also poor, have a very different feel. I could live there if I had too. (Except that Raunheim is terribly loud because of all the planes coming in just over your head.)
49820  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / U.S. Presidential Election Results / Re:Red and Blue on: July 10, 2004, 07:55:55 am
Order of preference:

1. Inner city
2. Country, not in town
3. Middle Suburbs
4. Country Town
5. Outer Suburbs
6. Under the sea

Maybe swap 5 and 6 Wink

I can't stand the suburbs.  Waste of space. Give it to me COMPACT.

4-2-1-6-3-5

I would rather die than live in suburbia (of course there's a difference between a suburb and suburbia... working class suburbs are not suburban)
Yes they are...They can be even worse than the other kind.
49821  General Politics / International General Discussion / The Bilingual Belt on: July 10, 2004, 07:54:45 am
It's Demography, not Politics, but still...
Out of Canada's 308 "ridings" (constituencies), 40 are over 10% French speaking and over 10% English speaking. They form something of a belt from Nova Scotia to Manitoba via Montréal and Ottawa cities.
(Note that the census asks for "mother tongue", prompting many immigrants and children of immigrants to mention the language from back home, even if they speak English these days. This seriously affects the number of over-10%-English speaking seats in Montréal.)

West Nova (In NSc)
Egmont (on Prince Edward Island)
Acadie-Bathurst
Madawaska-Restigouche
Beauséjour
Miramichi
Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe
Tobique-Mactaquac (all of them in NB. The first three are majority French speaking)
Gaspésie - Iles-de-la-Madeleine
Compton - Stanstead
Brôme - Missiqoui (rural Québec to the South of St Lawrence - English seems once to have been more widely spoken here, as viz. place names like Sherbrooke, Drummond, Richmond etc etc)
Outremont, Mount Royal, Notre-Dame-de-la-Grace - Lachine, Westmount - Ville-Marie, La Salle - Emard, Jeanne - Le Ber, St-Laurent - Cartierville, Pierrefonds - Dollard, Lac-St-Louis (all on Montréal Island, which includes a total of 18 ridings - Lac-St-Louis is almost 50% English speaking, but 7 out of these 9 are less than 50% French, and so are two more that are less than 10% English)
Brossard - La Praire
Châtauguay - Saint-Constant
Saint Lambert
Laval - Les Isles (all suburban Montréal)
Vaudreuil - Solanges where the Ottawa and St Lawrence rivers meet
Hull - Aylmer and Pontiac opposite Ottawa in Québec
Ottawa Centre, Ottawa South, Ottawa Vanier, Ottawa Orléans - ie all Ottawa City ridings safe one
Glengarry - Prescott - Russell and
Stormont - Dundas - South Glengarry to the South of Ottawa, to the east of Vaudreuil - Solanges. Glengarry etc is majority French speaking
pretty much all the Northeast Ontario ridings, with French percentages ranging into the forties:
Timmins - James Bay
Nipissing - Timiskaning
Nickel Belt
Algoma - Manitoulin - Kapuskasing
Sudbury
plus Provencher in rural SE Manitoba and St Boniface in Winnipeg.
49822  General Politics / International General Discussion / Re:Racial Politics In Great Britain on: July 10, 2004, 07:41:17 am
I've never met a brit who was black. I must admit the British accent would throw me off for sure. Smiley
A first or second generation Black Brit is more likely to have a Jamaican or West African accent than a British one.

Jamaican accents are cool Smiley
I shan't disagree.
49823  General Politics / Individual Politics / Re:What is your heaven like? on: July 10, 2004, 07:33:44 am
Yours, except for the last two words.
49824  General Politics / Individual Politics / Re:What is your heaven like? on: July 10, 2004, 07:32:53 am
"If it existed, what would it be like?" That's pretty silly, right? "If you had a girlfriend, what would she be like?"
But I'll weigh the options and tell you in a minute what kind of heaven I'd be pleasantly surprised to find six feet under. Not NH, btw (see "Red and Blue")
49825  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / U.S. Presidential Election Results / Re:Red and Blue on: July 10, 2004, 07:29:25 am
Order of preference:

1. Inner city
2. Country, not in town
3. Middle Suburbs
4. Country Town
5. Outer Suburbs
6. Under the sea

Maybe swap 5 and 6 Wink

I can't stand the suburbs.  Waste of space. Give it to me COMPACT.
1 - 4 - 2 - 6 - 3 - 5 for me.
Pages: 1 ... 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 [1993] 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 ... 2040


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory