|
1
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: The 20s (the next decade)
|
on: June 17, 2013, 08:19:37 am
|
|
The federal government will wind up having to readjust household income figures to account for the growing portion of people's "income" that results from obtaining free items and services by virtue of being advertised at.
The United States will collapse due to irreconcilable, ever growing cultural differences.
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Scripps National Spelling Bee and Asian Americans
|
on: June 08, 2013, 06:42:58 pm
|
|
Spelling Bees are not about memorizing obscure words and their spelling. It's about understanding language, root words, prefixes, and countries of origin. Many of these children have never heard of the obscure words they're spelling, which is why they make such an effort to ask for definitions, root languages, etc. to uncover clues to spelling the word correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections / A liberal mayor takes on the San Diego establishment
|
on: June 02, 2013, 03:38:40 pm
|
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-san-diego-mayor-20130602,0,5379711.storyBy Tony Perry, Los Angeles Times June 1, 2013, 4:16 p.m.
SAN DIEGO — Under a pro-business Republican mayor, it was a no-brainer: allocating millions of dollars each year to buy national advertising for the tourism industry — a major economic driver in this vacation mecca.
Then Bob Filner got elected, and he had questions: Why couldn't Sheraton and Hilton buy their own advertising? And why should the cash-strapped city lavish funds on an industry that pays low wages to bottom-rung employees like maids and bellhops?
The new Democratic mayor also thought the city attorney should provide him with legal guidance on the matter in private, not in front of reporters.
So he crashed Jan Goldsmith's news conference.
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: How many states will SSM be legal in in 2016?
|
on: May 21, 2013, 05:13:59 pm
|
Christie has basically said he'll step back and let the voters vote on an amendment, so NJ will likely have it within the next few years.
I'll also go with 1 or 5. There's too many small states that aren't going to legalize it any time soon without court decision.
My guess is that New Jersey Democrats will reach an agreement after Christie's re-election (provided Dems lock down the State Senate and Assembly again) to put marriage on the ballot. There's been a lot of resistance from Dems on the grounds of principle, but since a statewide vote is a slam dunk, not a lot of people are hung up on that principle anymore. Don't forget the New Jersey Supreme Court as a wildcard -- it's a very liberal institution that has been looking closely at whether or not civil unions are doing what the court required.
|
|
|
|
|
|