Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2015, 09:09:02 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 78
1  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: OUR next President..... on: April 18, 2015, 11:11:17 pm
1. Clarence! YAY!
2. She isn't winning. The polls are already sinking for her.


Just like she wasn't running, right?
2  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Rand Paul: Many in the GOP would have made the middle east worse than Obama has on: April 18, 2015, 02:40:38 pm
A speech from Rand Paul is indistinguishable from one from Putin.
3  General Politics / Individual Politics / Re: Opinion of Arizona on: April 17, 2015, 11:49:34 am
Sunshine and cactus, what's not to love?
4  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Kasich getting serious, launches PAC to raise money on: April 17, 2015, 11:48:36 am
Damn it, he would have a chance. Hopefully he is a poor fit for other swing states.
5  General Politics / Individual Politics / Re: Opinion of Rand Paul on: April 16, 2015, 03:22:26 pm
Creepy swine, just like his father.

There's nothing more creepy than thinking water boarding isn't torture.

Yeah, putting someone under water for a limited time, leaving no permanent physical damage is hardcore torture.
6  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Why has Arkansas been forgotten? Polls there aren't all that bad for HC on: April 15, 2015, 10:42:02 pm
Hillary has a better chance of carrying LA than AR.
7  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls / Re: NH-PPP: Walker +10 on: April 15, 2015, 10:38:59 pm
Clinton at only 45%. Doesn't look so inevitable anymore. RUN WARREN RUN!!!!

According to this poll, Clinton is at 52% with Democrats in NH, it's the independents planning on voting in the primary dragging her down. Primaries need to be party only, this is how Obama got the nomination. Democrats should pick the Democratic candidate.
8  General Politics / Individual Politics / Opinion of Gun Owners of America on: April 15, 2015, 03:04:06 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Owners_of_America

Inspired by the NRA poll.
9  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Rate Hillary's chances of winning the 2016 Presidential election on: April 15, 2015, 01:14:11 pm
>55%
10  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Hugh Rodham's tombstone vandalized on: April 15, 2015, 12:43:27 pm
Wasn't he a hardcore Republican?
11  General Politics / Individual Politics / Re: Opinion of Rand Paul on: April 15, 2015, 12:14:48 pm
Creepy swine, just like his father.
12  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: When will we next have a competitive Democratic Primary? on: April 15, 2015, 12:13:49 pm
The homosexual, abortionist overlords don't like primaries.  But then again, they don't need them as the Democrats have lost their moderate and conservative wings.

I've always been confused by the pairing of homosexuality and abortion in politics. Besides being the two main issues Falwell used to turn Christians against the Democrats in the 80s, what do these issues have to do with each other? Absolutely nothing.
13  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: The "Who is running?" tea leaves thread (Part 2) on: April 13, 2015, 01:52:16 pm
Republican best hope in 2016 will be declaring his candidacy officially in a few hours Smiley

Not that this day was a surprise to anyone following the party or Rubio's career, it was inevitable the day Romney lost the 2012 election.
If he's the Republican's best hope, wow.

Hmmm a young hispanic senator from the must win swing state of Florida?

- The new generation vs the old generation in Hilary?
- Young and Hispanic whose open to immigration reform. Hmmm hispanics when push come to shove, should I vote for the 1% in Hilary Clinton that has no idea what its like to be me or Marco Rubio and help elect the first hispanic president of the United States?? HMMM
- Great Speaker from humble beginnings. Wait the Democrat nominee will be the 1% that is all about Wall Street and the Republican candidate will have grown up with nothing from two parents that worked their butts off to put food on the table?! HMMMM
- Rubio is one of the few if not only Republicans with a realistic path to 270 electoral votes.
- Rubio will be in his 40s on a debate stage with Hilary who will be 70 and is a grandmother.
- HMMM who did Hilary lose the nomination to back in 2008??

Thats just the start, i could list countless other reasons why he's the perfect fit to be the republican nominee in 2016.

Not to mention he by far scares the democrats more than ANYONE else the republicans are running. They would be ecstatic if any of Walker. Bush, Christie, Paul etc. won the nomination.

They know for countless reasons the republicans have one candidate with a real path to 270 electoral votes and his name is Marco Rubio. The Clintons know this as well their no fools. Quite the coincidence she declares the DAY BEFORE Rubio, to take away from his announcement. That would be one heck of a coincidence.

There is one other candidate that had a path to 270 electoral votes running on the republican side and his name is Jeb Bush. Unfortunately, for him we have had two Bush presidents already and the country isn't ready for a third. So unfortunately for him he is eliminated, even though if his last name wasn't Bush he would be the only candidate with a real path to 270 electoral votes like Marco Rubio.

Democrats fear Marco Rubio for good reason.

Your 2016 election will be Rubio vs. Clinton. We will see who wins, it will be an EXTREMELY close election.



He's a generic hack. His race is his only selling point.
14  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: Rasmussen: Hillary leads Cruz by 9, Paul by 10 on: April 13, 2015, 11:00:23 am
LOL at Paul being lower than Cruz. I guess some on the right just can't support Paul for not following King Bibi.
15  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Hillary win a county in WV-03? on: April 13, 2015, 08:02:50 am
No. It swing more R.
16  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Hillary's campaign theme on: April 12, 2015, 09:09:10 pm
This is already sort of her theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnWV2K24DQ8

When Perry offered to write her theme over Twitter, Hillary tweeted back that she already had with this song, so it's Hillary endorsed.
17  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Hillary's campaign theme on: April 12, 2015, 07:07:15 pm
Quote
No, Rand Paul will come out for gay marriage when it is politically convenient for him, just like Obama and Clinton.

You're probably right, Chairman Sanchez.  The difference is he won't persecute or demonize those who believe differently. And that's an important distinction.

The Democrats are labeling Republicans bigots for having the same view Obama had less than 3 years ago.

Hillary's ad didn't persecute or demonize anybody. She supports gay marriage, and her ad advertised that. It said absolutely nothing about those with opposing views.
18  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: What percentage will Hillary get of the white vote? on: April 11, 2015, 08:30:37 pm
38%.
19  Forum Community / Off-topic Board / Opinion of Janeane Garofalo on: April 11, 2015, 03:20:50 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janeane_Garofalo
20  General Politics / Individual Politics / Re: Opinion of Hillary Clinton on: April 10, 2015, 07:22:17 pm
FF. A pragmatic, intelligent woman and one of the few people legitimately qualified to lead the nation.
21  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Bloomberg poll: Dems and Indies don't want Hillary coronation on: April 10, 2015, 03:10:26 pm
Always the same posters pushing this "Hillary is unpopular" narrative.
22  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: PPP: Lincoln Chafee at 0 in New Hampshire on: April 10, 2015, 11:39:20 am
I don't expect Chafee to win the nomination obviously but I could actually see him doing well in New Hampshire and opening the opportunity for a better dark horse candidate (O'Malley) to upset Hillary. Her favourability numbers are plummeting and she remains pretty unpopular, even among Democrats (grudging acceptance of pseudo-inevitability aside). I live in hope.

Either way, huge FF for daring to challenge the coronation.

An 81% favorable rating is unpopular?
23  General Politics / Individual Politics / Re: Opinion of Bill Clinton on: April 09, 2015, 05:15:07 pm
I don't see how you can credit Hart or Dukakis for anything. The newfound Hart obsession these days is bizarre - Matt Bai writes a crappy article about him, he comes out of the woodwork to join the O'Malley campaign, and now he somehow helped the Democratic party?

It's especially strange why progressive Democrats who oppose Clinton for the DLC and moving the party to the economic center would like Hart, since Hart was basically the proto-Clinton. He was John the Baptist to Clinton's messiah. A young, unfaithful red state guy taking about new ideas and economic centrism and modernizing the party. The only thing he doesn't have that Clinton has is the Arkansas hick thing. Well, that and the unusual wife. But the main difference is that he lost.

Who talked about Hart?

Dukakis was like the Neil Kinnock of the Democrats. He tried to give himself a New Democrat makeover, but his coalition was still the old Democrat coalition. I mean, he won West Virginia while losing Maryland, for crying out loud. It's hard to believe that was only 26 years ago.

So what? Is the Old Democrat a bad Democrat? Clinton embodied the DLC, Mondale and Dukakis didn't. That's why they lost. I'll be honest with you: I would have voted for Carter and Mondale over Reagan because both of them were more honest than Reagan who acted his way into the White House just like Clinton did.

Quote
Without the media and without Perot, Clinton would have lost badly in 1992

Actually, Clinton was struggling in the polls until Perot dropped out - then he suddenly surged to near landslide levels. Most of Perot's spring voters clearly preferred Clinton as a second choice.

Nah, it is hard for me to believe that Clinton could have won Georgia, Montana, Colorado and New Hampshire without Perot. And coming close in FL, WY, KS, AZ without Perot? I doubt it.

Dukakis received 45% in CO and 46% in MT. It's not unrealistic that Clinton would have won them in a two way race with Bush in 92 and then lost them to Dole in 96.
24  Forum Community / Off-topic Board / Re: Opinion of Howard Stern on: April 09, 2015, 10:17:55 am
Annoying narcissist. Not even a million people listen to him anymore and he still thinks he's king of the world.
25  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: CO/IA/VA-Quinnipiac: Hillary quite weak, as Paul runs best against her on: April 09, 2015, 10:15:48 am
Way too many undecideds, worthless polls.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 78


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines