|
102
|
General Politics / Individual Politics / Re: You're Hubert Humphrey...
|
on: May 02, 2013, 08:25:11 pm
|
|
Humphrey was facing major Electoral College headwinds; even if he uniformly improved his performance to defeat Nixon in the popular vote he still would have lost soundly. He needed to do about 2 points better in a slew of northeastern and Midwest states. I don't know who he should have picked, but another Midwesterner and a Catholic would have been definitely a plus.
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Americans Overwhelmingly Support Surveillance-State
|
on: May 02, 2013, 11:23:57 am
|
Totally ridiculous as usual. Video monitoring will never stop a single terrorist. It might result in faster apprehension, but few terrorists are much concerned with being caught. Plus, death and damages from terrorism are miniscule per annum--not at all worth the cost of surveillance cameras on their own.
Of course, surveillance cameras are good for stopping ordinary crime and apprehending ordinary criminals, as well as creating a record to use to prevent police abuses. So they're a good thing, but people are supporting them for totally moronic reasons, as usual.
Precisely. The red line for me is a distinction between public and private spaces, as well as who and for what reason is getting access to 'surveillance'. For instance, we obviously can't prevent companies like Facebook from accessing their own members' account data and selling that to marketing companies. And I'm betting the government intelligence agencies have some way to get to that data, regardless of what they might say. But if a prospective employer was given access to a person's Facebook account as part of a background check, that would be stepping over the line.
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
General Politics / Individual Politics / Re: Pro-Life/Pro-SSM vs. Pro-Choice/Anti-SSM
|
on: May 02, 2013, 10:33:45 am
|
|
Pro-Choice/Anti-SSM.
Assuming we're talking about the presidency, being pro-choice is a lot more important to me because the president appoints the Supreme Court, which could overturn Roe v. Wade. Gay marriage is mostly fought at the state level so who the president is only matters based on whether or not he or she defends DOMA. When Obama came out for gay marriage, literally nothing changed. It was primarily a campaign ploy on his part.
This may be controversial, but I'd also say abortion rights is a more important issue than SSM. Substantively, legal recognition about SSM is about getting partner benefits, whereas legal recognition of abortion is about bodily autonomy and could potentially have life or death implications. We've seen what happens when abortion is pushed underground with the Kermit Gosnell case. Nothing that results from SSM has similar stakes that I'v seen.
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
General Politics / International General Discussion / Re: South Korea taking plastic surgery to the extreme
|
on: May 02, 2013, 03:26:21 am
|
This is pretty disturbing. Also interesting to note is that one of the most common procedures is shaping the eyes to make them look "less Asian/more Western".
Advocates would say it's not about being less Asian/more Western, it's simply about having larger eyes, which some Asians naturally have anyway. The doe-eyed look on these Korean women is kind of freaky, though (I don't know if it's the eyes or just the uniform expressions). It's not good if it *always* looks like they're posing or staring straight at you.
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Mark Sanford becomes poster boy for affair site
|
on: April 30, 2013, 03:33:43 pm
|
|
I have a problem with what Clinton did too, but as stated above, Sanford really went off the deep end which Clinton never did. Also, the Republicans really stepped in it trying to impeach Clinton. I wish they had convicted him and removed him from office, because then incumbent president Gore would have won in a landslide in 2000.
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
General Politics / Individual Politics / Re: Opinion of Lady Bird Johnson
|
on: April 30, 2013, 03:23:38 pm
|
|
Obviously she's uncontroversial for the sake of not having had the power to do controversial things.
She lived in the shadow of her husband her whole life and faced his infidelities and abuse, but got hers in the end by outliving him by over a third of a century.
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
General Politics / Political Geography & Demographics / Re: What state's borders should be changed?
|
on: April 30, 2013, 01:04:30 pm
|
|
Virginia should annex Jefferson, Berkeley, Morgan, Hampshire, Mineral, Hardy, Grant, and Pendleton counties of West Virginia, giving it control of the entire eastern panhandle of West Virginia; plus Garrett and Allegany the two westernmost counties of Maryland. A line from the southernmost tip of West Virginia straight down to the Tennessee border should be chopped off and given to Kentucky. Finally, draw a line from Roanoke to Danville, and everything west of that line and east of the West Virginia-Tennessee line should be given to North Carolina.
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
General Politics / International General Discussion / Re: A year on: Forum approval of President François Hollande
|
on: April 30, 2013, 11:44:32 am
|
And this is where I agree with you most. I think there need to be massive wage increases here. Raising our wages to an appropriate level would be the best thing that could be done for everyone - both for the German worker and for the competitiveness of the workers in other countries.
Precisely. The only sense I could see that Germany and Greece' interests would be the same are that they are both affected by the same business cycle. That is, a slowdown in Germany would negatively impact Greece's ability to increase its exports, whereas the crisis in Greece contributes to the general crisis which is having negative business cycle implications in Germany as well. I think we're beginning to see evidence that stagnation and disinflation are becoming region-wide.
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Obama Faces Liberal Backlash on Campaign Finance Failures
|
on: April 30, 2013, 11:15:19 am
|
President Barack Obama has failed to follow through on campaign finance reform promises, allies say, despite pledges he made during his reelection campaign to stop the influence of money in politics. In a joint letter to Obama Monday, seven reform groups said they have a “deep concern about the nation’s corrupt campaign finance system and about your failure, to date, as president to provide meaningful leadership or take effective action to solve this fundamental problem facing our democracy,” The Washington Post reported. For one, all five members of the Federal Election Commission, the agency responsible for enforcing the country’s campaign finance laws, are currently serving past the formal expiration of their terms. A sixth seat is vacant and the president hasn’t made a nomination to the FEC in more than three years. http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-campaign-finance-reform/2013/04/30/id/502010
|
|
|
|
|
|