|
36
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: The memphis Memorial Deluge of Absurdity, Ignorance, and Bad Posts
|
on: May 12, 2013, 08:50:14 pm
|
I'll say AynRandLand for another reason. After religion is destroyed, greed by and large will be destroyed. Most people are naturally benevolent, they need religion/superstition/junk science to feel they have a superior standing than others and therefore justify their greed. Societies in which religion is powerful breed this type of thought. ...what? It's absurd to think my belief system will save humanity? You do the exact same! no matter.
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Which of these two countries is more liveable?
|
on: May 12, 2013, 08:44:26 pm
|
Religion helps equalize people, and helps people become more charitable... the person a few posts above has it completely backwards.
LOL! I won't entertain anything that has the words "religion" and "help" in the same sentence... much less "religion" and "equalize". Yea... when I think equality I think religion.
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Which of these two countries is more liveable?
|
on: May 12, 2013, 08:42:28 pm
|
After religion is destroyed, greed by and large will be destroyed. Most people are naturally benevolent, they need religion/superstition/junk science to feel they have a superior standing than others and therefore justify their greed. This is backwards, of course. People are naturally self-centred and need society to teach them otherwise. Plenty aren't. For an atheist, you sure don't seem to put much stock in scientifically conducted research. What scientifically conducted research? The most religious Americans actually give more money to secular causes than do secular Americans.We find the same pattern when we examine how much people give. On average, those in the most religious fifth donate $3,000 to charity annually. Those in the most secular fifth give approximately $1,000. The story is the same when we consider charitable giving as a fraction of household income: By this measure, religious Americans are four times as generous as their secular neighbors, even as they are a little less affluent than secular Americans.
snip
Roughly three-quarters of charity given by highly religious Americans is indeed channeled toward religion. But religiosity provides such a boost to financial giving overall that the most religious Americans actually give more money to secular causes than do secular Americans. And how many "secular" Americans are there? Ehhh... go buy your way into heaven/do it because you are told if you like, whether you like it or not that's what guides the good deeds of most religious people. If the ends justify the means, good for you. I don't agree. I just don't understand the complete lack of equality in the matter. The religiouses are allowed to advertise their belief system as the humanity's salvation... but us atheists aren't allowed to do the same? I genuinely believe atheism/agnosticism/secularism is what will save humanity. That's why I believe in it so strongly. More bigotry against atheists from the Atlas, but that's to be expected. Every minority has to deal with BS.
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Which of these two countries is more liveable?
|
on: May 12, 2013, 01:32:12 pm
|
After religion is destroyed, greed by and large will be destroyed. Most people are naturally benevolent, they need religion/superstition/junk science to feel they have a superior standing than others and therefore justify their greed. This is backwards, of course. People are naturally self-centred and need society to teach them otherwise. Plenty aren't. For an atheist, you sure don't seem to put much stock in scientifically conducted research. What scientifically conducted research?
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Is the preceding poster a FF or HP?
|
on: May 12, 2013, 09:31:51 am
|
Despite what I'm sure are vast ideological and personal differences, he seems a respectable person who's interesting and has a very healthy amount of knowledge (more so than mine, I'm sure, in a number of categories). I'm inclined to say FF.
FF, despite being suburban In all honesty, that was a rhetorical flourish to show how evil I was compared to BRTD and crew. *SKIP* And you will see that I played into the joke **SKIP**
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: What issues have you evolved on in your time at the Atlas?
|
on: May 12, 2013, 09:26:19 am
|
|
Forgot a big one: I was somewhat racist back as a teen in the sense that uttering epithets was okay. Going to school at Rutgers-Camden changed all that quickly. Now I just ironically utter racial epithets against whites for shock value at my conservative friends to piss them off, and for comedy at my liberal friends who understand what I'm trying to do.
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Is the preceding poster a FF or HP?
|
on: May 12, 2013, 09:22:43 am
|
Despite what I'm sure are vast ideological and personal differences, he seems a respectable person who's interesting and has a very healthy amount of knowledge (more so than mine, I'm sure, in a number of categories). I'm inclined to say FF.
FF, despite being suburban
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Which of these two countries is more liveable?
|
on: May 12, 2013, 09:05:45 am
|
I'll say AynRandLand for another reason. After religion is destroyed, greed by and large will be destroyed. Most people are naturally benevolent, they need religion/superstition/junk science to feel they have a superior standing than others and therefore justify their greed. Societies in which religion is powerful breed this type of thought. Yes, forced secularist countries like the Communists established didn't work, but that's because they forced the atheism upon people. That doesn't work because it's a slap to the face of free will. AynRandLand is terrible because the lack of religion will naturally result in a society that moves away from unchecked capitalism, but the Rand ideology will dictate that we can't move towards collectivism EVEN IF WE WANT TO. To illustrate: This picture is no coincidence, whether or not the faithful would like to believe otherwise. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/01/homeless-man-tests-kindness-religions-atheists-money_n_3189871.html
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Is opebo a better person than everyone who opposes same-sex marriage?
|
on: May 12, 2013, 08:56:08 am
|
From my perspective it would be impossible to like anyone more than I like myself, and since I don't believe in objective value, ipso facto I'm the best person in the world and all those mentioned are 'worse'.
Not sure I can quite say this, because I can never be as amazing as Christopher Walken, but i see what you're getting at. It's like how I was thinking about making a poll... who has the best politics in the world? If you don't say "me"... you're either kind of a hypocrite or calling yourself a moron, aren't you?
|
|
|
|
|
|