Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 05, 2016, 01:44:06 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 515
76  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Top 5 positive outcomes expected from a Trump presidency on: November 27, 2016, 11:03:47 pm
These negative and petulant comments by the losing side in this election against the very insightful and timely observations by the OP show that the Democrats and other malcontents cannot accept any comments about the positivity of a Trump Presidency.

Well get used to it.  We're running things now.  And we will straighten out the mess left by Obama and his inept administration.

Another point I will make about the positive aspects of a Trump Presidency is that we will now be getting Supreme Court Justices who will respect and honor the constitution.  We now have the opportunity to be in control of the Supreme Court for a generation.

Trump Presidency = Better Than Another Clinton Presidency
77  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Trump claims "millions of people" voted illegally. on: November 27, 2016, 10:39:26 pm
There are no doubt isolated actual and alleged  incidents of voter fraud out there.

I am not disputing the situation in Loving County.

But that is not as a result of the Republican Party per say.

It would be as a result of some rogue elements or wing nut perpetrators.

When President Elect Trump says millions of ballots were illegally cast, he is obviously not accusing the Republican Party of voter fraud.

78  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Trump claims "millions of people" voted illegally. on: November 27, 2016, 08:21:08 pm
Yeah Trump really went to Loving County, Texas himself and committed voter fraud since Trump voted in NY(NYC to be exact.)

That's really ridiculous to recount every state that Trump won like Trump would have lost SD, ND, MT, KS, OK, TX, LA, MS, MO, AR, TN, KY, SC, IN, WY, UT to begin with? None of those states would Hillary have won anyway.

I wouldn't go so far as to say that Trump explicitly authorized or orchestrated the fraud in Loving County, or anywhere else.  I'm simply asking why his supporters found it necessary to rig the election.  The numbers don't lie.
So your saying his supporters voted twice in some states that he won? Is that it?

What do you mean, 'is that it?'   This is voter fraud - a very serious issue that Republicans have tirelessly worked to discuss and even prevent.

Trump is looking to have lost nationally by 2.5 million votes, but if the fraud of Loving County is any indication, the REAL number may be much larger.  Millions of illegal votes cast for an illegitimate president.  How can we have any trust in democracy?  Trust in our system of government?  Trump supporters not only committed voter fraud, but the man himself appears to be openly admitting it.

The Republicans did not commit voter fraud.  Prove it.

To all the millions of disgruntled malcontents out there:

You lost.

Get over it.

We will begin work on the Supreme Court immediately after taking power.

Thank  you so much Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin for your invaluable support.

Because of you, we will now have a Supreme Court for a generation with justices who respect the constitution.
79  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Trump claims "millions of people" voted illegally, offers no proof of that. on: November 27, 2016, 07:55:04 pm
Thanks a lot, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.  You've made this national embarrassment our president.   You've prevented Crooked Hillary from becoming our President.

Corrected.
80  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Question: Why is Jill Stein raising millions of dollars for recount... on: November 27, 2016, 07:47:45 pm
Obviously, she failed to make an  impact on the electorate, so now she thinks she is going to give herself notoriety and credibility by calling for a meaningless, expensive, costly, useless recount that is not going to change anything.   
81  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: If Hillary had Bernie as VP, could she have won WI, PI & MI? on: November 26, 2016, 06:46:12 pm
No, but she also wouldn't have lost any additional states. Running mates don't have nearly the effect people in this thread think they do.

True.

The last Vice Presidential candidate to actually have an impact on the election results was Lyndon Johnson in 1960, when he was crucial to John F Kennedy winning the election.
82  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Who gets the nod as Secretary of State? on: November 26, 2016, 06:09:38 pm
Who gets this crucial post in the Trump cabinet?

Please vote and comment if you wish.
83  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Clinton Campaign Counsel: "We'll participate in recount" on: November 26, 2016, 05:34:30 pm
The bottom line, these recounts are not going to change anything.

If the Clinton campaign really thought a recount might change the results, they would have initiated one themselves.

Clearly, that confirms beyond any question that the Clinton campaign knows a recount will not change any of the results in their favor.

To the Democrats and other malcontents who did not get the memo:

You lost.

Get over it.  
84  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: upcoming recounts on: November 26, 2016, 05:32:46 pm
Obviously these recounts will not change the end results.

To the Democrats and other malcontents who didn't get the memo:

You lost.

Get over it.
85  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: BREAKING: Wisconsin to recount presidential votes on: November 26, 2016, 12:50:49 am
It is much easier to flip a margin of a few hundred votes than one of 27k votes. Unless she has some reason to believe that something is seriously wrong in Wisconsin than she's wasting her time and money.

Or, more accurately, other people's money.
86  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: If Hillary had Bernie as VP, could she have won WI, PI & MI? on: November 26, 2016, 12:48:09 am
No.

Voters in these states would not want some crack pot leftist wing nut, whose policies would bankrupt the country within a year,  to be a heart beat away from the Presidency.

He won MI and WI in the Democratic primaries, though, so that doesn't really make sense.

In the primaries Sanders was put over the top by Leftist Wing Nuts.

In the election, he would be dealing with sane voters.
87  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: BREAKING: Wisconsin to recount presidential votes on: November 26, 2016, 12:33:38 am
To those on the Looney Left who didn't get the memo:

You lost.

Get over it.

Recounts will not change the results.
88  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Jill Stein recount requests on: November 26, 2016, 12:25:11 am
To those on the Looney Left who didn't get the memo:

You lost.

Get over it.
89  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Trump advisor threatens House GOP in meeting: Your no longer the party of Reagan on: November 24, 2016, 07:14:08 pm
There is something called

Separation Of Powers

Executive/Legislative/Judicial

It takes two to tango
90  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Mike Pence as VP pick on: November 24, 2016, 06:48:37 pm
One of the very best Vice Presidential picks in the 20th and 21st centuries.

Is fully capable of carrying out the responsibilities of the Presidency should that become necessary.
91  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Are the Republicans eventually in trouble down the road? on: November 23, 2016, 05:10:59 pm
Keep telling yourselves that if it makes  you feel better after your devastating loss.

But clearly in politics, the tide goes out, the tide comes in.

There will be good times and there will be bad times for both major parties.

It runs in cycles.
92  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: A new species of bird has been discovered.......... on: November 23, 2016, 04:50:36 pm
Let me tell you, that bird has made some amazing deals. He is just a tremendous businessbird, he has opened so many nestsósome of the best nests in the worldóworth billions and billions of worms. And he knows some of the best businessbirds too, and they are doing incredible work and making incredible things happen. That bird is brilliant success, and that bird will make the sky great again, believe me.

This is awesome!

Thanks.
93  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results on: November 23, 2016, 04:48:42 pm
You lost.

Get over it.
94  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2020 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Bill de Blasio 2020? on: November 23, 2016, 02:43:22 pm
No.

The accidental New York City Mayor who the New York City Police turned their backs on would be a joke candidate.

Had Anthony Weiner had any decency, he would have been Mayor and de Blasio would still be living in relative obscurity.
95  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: If Hillary had Bernie as VP, could she have won WI, PI & MI? on: November 23, 2016, 02:09:29 pm
No.

Voters in these states would not want some crack pot leftist wing nut, whose policies would bankrupt the country within a year,  to be a heart beat away from the Presidency.
96  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Some Clinton electors lobbying for EC protest votes? on: November 23, 2016, 01:22:35 pm
That's awfully desperate when you start pleading with the Presidential Electors to vote against the choice the people of their state made.

But of course, that's about what I would expect from supporters of crooked Hillary.

This Desperation Tactic = Major Fail.
97  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: The Dems need an autopsy -- they are now a completely regional party. on: November 22, 2016, 11:54:01 pm
The future I see for the Democratic Party

Northeast Coast

West Coast

With Maine, New Hampshire and Oregon as toss ups

98  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: If Hillary chose Brown instead of Kaine for VP, would she have won? on: November 22, 2016, 11:04:26 pm
Of course not.

No VP selection could save Hillary from herself.

Generally, a VP pick has no effect on the ticket, unless they are found mid campaign to have been involved in scandal, or really blow it somehow.
99  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: In retrospect, was Tim Kaine a bust of a VP pick? on: November 22, 2016, 11:00:54 pm
On paper, a very good pack.

In practicality, a disappointment.

In the debate with Pence, Kaine sounded like a child in the school yard trying to constantly yell louder than anyone else so he could be heard.

Pence eviscerated Kaine in the debate.
100  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Last minute poll: who wins Michigan? on: November 22, 2016, 10:48:40 pm
Trump.

Obviously.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 515


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines