Hispanic is a non-racial, multi-ethnic completely made up term.  Why can't it be defined by political views, at least somewhat?

I think Phil is right on this one, but I can't figure out why he's so intent on arguing the point.  It's an Internet forum -- who cares if some guy in another state (country?) disagrees whether some kid in Utah is a punk or not.  Don't we all have better things to do with our lives?

He was a Saints fan, I believe, so FF.

[nobody]

Disagree - the TV episodes can wait until the emotions are less raw.

No one is forcing anybody to watch anything.  Why do you want to force people not to be able to watch something?

Why can't people be understanding and patient?

Why do you insist that nobody be able to watch a tv show because something happened that upset you?  Again, if you're too upset to watch the show, don't watch it.  Don't force everyone else to miss it.

John and I'm quite shocked to be the first person to vote as such. John captures a sense of hunger that the other three don't in their writing, which makes it far more interesting to read. Not that the other three aren't good to read as well.

You like that long boring monologue that goes on for chapters and chapters?

Mark I guess.  John is easily the worst.  SO boring.

I heard the torrents didn't work well, and usually you would try to download something but after 2-3 hours of downloading it would suddenly 'fail', or that the video would be very herky-jerky.

That's not even close.  With a decent connection, you can torrent an episode of an hour-long tv show in about 10 minutes or less.  And if you get the ones marked EZTV or ETTV, it's going to be practically HD-quality.

A friend of mine who is an elementary school teacher was telling me that most elementary school teachers really don't like math, and therefore most people are taught basic math by someone who doesn't like it and isn't good at it, and it just reinforces a cycle of people not liking math and not being good at it.

So I'm assuming this means no more global warming research until the Democrats retake Congress fully?

Harry, silly boy.. why would we need more global warming research?  Al Gore said it himself... the science is settled.  The debate is over!  The time for action is now!

That obvious strawman is pathetic, and disappointing from a red avatar.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/11/04/canada-calls-the-u-s-election-guess-who-wins-obama-or-romney/

According to this, Obama would have won Alberta comfortably.  No idea how reliable it is.

Maddux for sure.

Disagree - the TV episodes can wait until the emotions are less raw.

No one is forcing anybody to watch anything.  Why do you want to force people not to be able to watch something?

I honestly don't care who wins in this race, since I don't live in Hawai'i, but it would be preferable to keep the governship, both House seats, and both Senate seats in Democratic hands, and with as liberal of Democrats as possible, so I hope the Hawai'i Democratic Party does what it takes to achieve that result.

I thought you said no charts...

Well ... it's going to have to be John Paul by default, although his two successors were much better.

I think I remember my 3rd birthday party, but it might just be from watching video from it long ago.  I remember lots of bits and pieces from preschool.

You should try another 2012 with a realistic Canada (Obama winning big in every province).

Eh, I'd expect Romney to possibly win Alberta.

That's fine, if that's what the data suggests.  I find that kinda surprising if true though.

You should try another 2012 with a realistic Canada (Obama winning big in every province).

Obviously not.  The problem is that so many on the "Christian" "pro-life" side like to paint the pro-choice side as secretly supporting this.  So many of them really believe it...

Evolution was only discussed in AP Biology in high school, which I didn't take, so N/A.

In college, I took one most Biology course.  The professor was a redneck who told us "I know none of yall believe in evolution, but when you'll change your minds when I show you what changed my mind."  I don't think there were actually any evolution deniers in the class (they didn't speak up if there were), and his explanation of evolution probably wasn't really enough to convince any non-believer, but it was one of those required courses for any Arts/Sciences major, so a lot of people in the class just didn't want to be there.

Climate denial is like a religion to them.  It is literally impossible to debate or offer sources -- every scientific journal is a liberal conspiracy.

So I'm assuming this means no more global warming research until the Democrats retake Congress fully?

Agree 100%.  If you're too upset to watch a show, DVR it, watch it online later, or just wait for a rerun.

Anything less than "gay marriage is now legal everywhere" is Plessy part 2. I think the justices realize this.

A climate change litmus test has worked well for me so far in state elections when most others would fail.