|
8051
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / International What-ifs / Re: Canada: What if the Progressives displaced the Liberals? (Or the Tories!)
|
on: September 05, 2009, 09:51:41 am
|
|
Quebec 1931 Lib - 79 Pro- 6 Con - 5
Not much going on at this time, except that Liberal dominance continues. But that's all about to change when a break-away faction from the Liberals causes everything to go amiss.
Quebec 1935 Lib - 46 ALN - 26 Con - 10 Pro - 8
A group of left-wing Liberals broke off from the Liberal party. Demanding change, they united with the Conservatives and the Progressives to form the Union Nationale. With the support of not only the ALN and Conservatives but the Progressives as well, they scored an overwhelming victory in the next election.
Quebec 1936 UN - 86 Lib - 4
Within a year of the election, however, over a dozen members had broken off from the UN due to the increasingly right-wing policies of it's leader, Maurice Duplessis. These Progressives were able to take hold of the agenda and marginalize the Liberals.
Quebec 1939 Pro - 42 Lib - 29 UN- 15
The Liberals, eager to return to power, and the Progressives, eager to form their first government, signed a pact and formed a coalition government with Progressive policies, and a Liberal premier.
Quebec 1944 UN - 48 Lib/Pro - 39 Bloc - 4
The anti-war Bloc Populaire was able to win 4 seats this election. The Liberal-Progressive alliance was pushed into the opposition. The alliance fell apart prior to the next election
Quebec 1948 UN - 82 Pro - 8 Lib - 1
Increasing numbers of Liberals joined the provincial Progressive party, while remaining in support of the federal Liberals. The Provincial Progressives for their part were not anxious in the slightest to tie themselves to the federal Progressive movement. The Federal Progressive party had a very difficult time breaking into Quebec, as those who supported Progressive policies, were adverse to the leaders of the Progressive movement who were by in large western Canadians, and protestants.
Quebec 1952 UN - 68 Pro - 22 Lib - 2
The policy of keeping the provincial and federal Progressives separate would prove to be a successful idea.
Quebec 1956 UN - 72 Pro- 20 Lib - 1
The list of Premiers of Quebec is as follows.
Lomer Gouin (Lib) 1905-1920 Louis-Alexandre Taschereau (Lib) 1920-1936 Adelard Godbout (Lib) 1936 Maurice Duplessis (UN) 1936-1939 Adelard Godbout (Lib) 1936-1944 Maurice Duplessis (UN) 1944-present
|
|
|
|
|
8052
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / International What-ifs / Re: Canada: What if the Progressives displaced the Liberals? (Or the Tories!)
|
on: September 05, 2009, 09:25:21 am
|
I personally recommend you do a real 'narrative' timeline like most timelines on this board are... Stats are nice, but it's always nicer if there's a narrative that tells us the story, if you catch my drift.
The fun starts in 1957. Pictures, graphics, more tables, a compelling story. Until then, sadly, its quite boring. Two more posts (one to get Quebec out of the way, and another for federal elections) and then the fun starts tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
8054
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / International What-ifs / Re: Canada: What if the Progressives displaced the Liberals? (Or the Tories!)
|
on: September 05, 2009, 06:56:45 am
|
|
Premiers of Ontario Ernest Dury (PRO) 1919-1925 Harry Nixon (PRO) 1925-1934 Mitchell Hepburn (Lib) 1934-1942 George Conant (Lib) 1942-1943 George A Drew (Lib) 1943-1948 Mitchell Hepburn (Lib) 1948-1949 (Interim) Leslie Frost (Lib) 1949-present (1957)
The Hepburn government and federal King government did not get along well. Hepburn, while remaining leader of the party, stepped aside as Premier and allowed Conant to take over. Liberals demanded a leadership election in which George A Drew was elected. Drew, a former Tory, had chosen to run for the Liberals and not the Tories upon entering provincial politics, despite holing a Conservative membership while mayor of Guelph. Drew was defeated in his riding by William Temple from the Progressives, and opted to resign as Premier, and run federally, becoming a key cabinet minister in the government of Louis St. Laurent. Drew was followed by Leslie Frost, a powerful figure in Ontario politics for years to come. Frost was premier when Ontario's highway 401 was constructed, as well as Toronto's Subway.
British Columbia John Oliver (Lib) 1918-1927 John MacLean (Lib) 1927-1928 Simon Fraser Tolmie (Con) 1928-1930 Duff Pattullo (Lib) 1930-1941 John Hart (Lib) 1941-1947 Byron Johnson (Lib) 1947-1952 W.A.C. Bennett (SC) 1952-present
Alberta Herbert Greenfield (Pro) 1921-1925 John Edward Brownlee (Pro) 1925-1934 Richard Reid (Pro) 1934-1935 William Aberhart (SC) 1935-1943 Ernest Manning (SC) 1943-present
Saskatchewan William M. Martin (Lib) 1916-1922 Charles A. Dunning (Lib) 1922-1926 James G. Gardiner (Lib) 1926-1929 James T.M. Anderson (Pro/Con) 1929-1932 James G. Gardiner (Lib) 1932-1935 William John Patterson (Lib) 1935-1944 Tommy Douglas (Pro) 1944-present
The Anderson government was elected with support of the Progressives and Conservatives. Anderson, a former Conservative, was chosen as Premier as he was seen as the one Progressive who Conservatives could get behind. Anderson quickly became very right-wing in government, and some Progressives refused to support the government. Anderson ran as Conservative leader in the 1932 election, and lost all seats, while anti-government Progressives managed to retain just a handful of seats.
Manitoba Tobias C Norris (Lib) 1920-1922 John Bracken (Pro) 1922-1943 Stuart S. Garson (Pro) 1943-1948 Douglas L. Campbell (Pro) 1948-present
New Brunswick Walter E Foster (Lib) 1917-1923 Peter J. Veniot (Lib) 1923-1925 John Baxter (Con) 1923-1931 Charles D Richards (Con) 1931-1932 Allison A Dysart (Lib) 1932-1940 John B McNair (Lib) 1940-1952 Hugh John Flemming (Lib) 1952-present
Nova Scotia George H Murray (Lib) 1896-1923 Ernest H Armstrong (Lib) 1923-1925 Edgar N Rhodes (Con) 1925-1930 Gordon S Harrington (Con) 1930-1933 Angus L Macdonald (Lib) 1933-1940 Alexander S MacMillan (Lib) 1940-1945 Angus L Macdonald (Lib) 1945-1954 Harold Connolly (Lib) 1954 Henry D Hicks (Lib) 1954-1956 Robert Stanfield (Lib) 1956-present
The election of Hicks over Connolly (who was also serving as interim leader at the time) was due to anti-catholic feeling. Hicks was unable to unite the party, and initially refused to sit in coalition with Social Credit. His MLA's revolted against him, and chose to sit with Social Credit with Stanfield as Premier.
Prince Edward Island John Howatt Bell (Lib) 1919-1925 Albert C Saunders (Lib) 1925-1930 Walter M Lea (Lib) 1930-1936 Thane A Campbell (Lib) 1936-1943 J Walter Jones (Lib) 1943-1953 Walter R Shaw (Lib) 1953-present
|
|
|
|
|
8055
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / International What-ifs / Re: Canada: What if the Progressives displaced the Liberals? (Or the Tories!)
|
on: September 05, 2009, 05:41:17 am
|
Rather than continue to post each province as part of the main story, I've decided to post them in a single list, and I will note which elections require a "story" and elaborate on those. (Translation - these elections are not important and I want to get them "out of the way") Alberta 1930 Pro - 49 Lib - 11
Alberta 1935 SC - 56 Lib - 5 Pro - 2
Alberta 1940 SC - 36 Lib - 20 Pro - 1
Alberta 1944 SC - 51 Lib - 7 Pro - 2
Alberta 1948 SC - 51 Lib - 4 Pro - 2
Alberta 1952 SC - 52 Lib - 5 Pro - 2
Alberta 1955 SC - 37 Lib - 22 Pro - 2
BC 1928 Lib - 21 Con - 15 Pro - 12
(The Conservatives and Progressives formed a pro-rural coalition government, which fell apart after the Depression hit)
BC 1930 Lib - 34 Pro - 10 Con - 3
BC 1934 Lib - 35 Pro - 12
BC 1937 Lib - 31 Pro - 17
BC 1941 Lib - 33 Pro - 15
BC 1945 Lib - 37 Pro - 15
BC 1949 Lib - 39 Pro - 11
BC 1952 SC - 19 Pro - 18 Lib - 11
BC 1953 SC - 28 Pro - 14 Lib - 6
BC 1956 SC - 39 Pro - 10 Lib - 3
Sask 1929 Lib - 28 Pro - 25 Con - 10
(Progressives and Conservatives formed a government, which was quickly co-opted by the Conservative agenda. It fell apart during the Depression.)
Sask 1932 Lib - 50 Pro - 5
Sask 1935 Lib - 41 Pro - 9
Sask 1938 Lib - 39 Pro - 12 SC - 2
Sask 1944 Pro - 47 (Lead by Tommy Douglas) Lib - 5
Sask 1948 Pro - 41 Lib - 19 SC - 2
Sask 1952 Pro - 42 Lib - 11
Sask 1956 Pro - 36 Lib - 14 SC - 3
Manitoba 1927 Pro - 33 Lib - 15 Con - 7
Manitoba 1932 Pro - 43 Lib - 10 Con - 2
Manitoba 1936 Pro - 30 Lib - 16 SC - 9
Manitoba 1941 Pro - 30 Lib - 15 SC - 10
Manitoba 1945 Pro - 29 Lib - 15 SC - 11
Manitoba 1949 Pro - 31 SC - 14 Lib - 12
Manitoba 1953 Pro - 35 SC - 12 Lib - 10
Nova Scotia 1928 Con - 24 Lib - 10 Pro - 8
(At it's demise in 1933, this would be the last Conservative government in Canadian history)
Nova Scotia 1933 Lib - 22 Pro - 8
Nova Scotia 1937 Lib - 25 Pro - 5
Nova Scotia 1941 Lib - 22 Pro - 5 SC - 3
Nova Scotia 1945 Lib - 28 SC - 2
Nova Scotia 1949 Lib - 27 Pro - 8 SC - 2
Nova Scotia 1953 Lib - 22 Pro - 13 SC - 2
Nova Scotia 1956 Lib - 20 Pro - 18 SC - 5
(The Liberals remained in office in coalition with Social Credit. This Minority government would go on to be a crucial turning point for allowing Social Credit to be perceived as a national party.)
PEI 1931 Lib - 15 Pro - 15
(The two parties agreed to work together under a Liberal administration. The Liberals were successfully able to play the unpopularity of the depression off on the policies demanded by the Progressives)
PEI 1935 Lib - 30
PEI 1939 Lib - 27 Pro - 3
PEI 1943 Lib - 20 Pro - 10
PEI 1947 Lib - 24 Pro - 6
PEI 1951 Lib - 24 Pro - 6
PEI 1955 Lib - 27 Pro - 3
New Brunswick 1925 (accidentally left off earlier) Lib - 23 Con - 13 Pro - 12
(Conservative lead coalition with the Progressives. Pro-rural)
New Brunswick 1930 Con - 17 Pro - 16 Lib - 15
(Conservative lead coalition with the Progressives, fell apart quickly)
New Brunswick 1932 Lib - 30 Pro - 13 Con - 5
New Brunswick 1937 Lib - 29 Pro - 19
New Brunswick 1942 Lib - 36 Pro - 12
New Brunswick 1947 Lib - 47 Pro - 5
New Brunswick 1952 Lib - 29 Pro - 23
(Despite a higher popular vote, the Progressives lost due to concentration of the vote in the english regions of the province)
New Brunswick 1956 Lib - 26 Pro - 24
(Despite a higher popular vote, the Progressives lost due to concentration of the vote in the english regions of the province. The Progressives would actively seek out a francophone to lead them into the next election. They eventually settled on Louis Robichaud.)
Ontario 1929 Pro - 92 Lib - 11 Con - 9
Ontario 1934 Lib - 69 Pro - 17 Con - 3
Ontario 1937 Lib - 66 Pro - 24
Ontario 1943 Lib - 38 Pro - 36 Con - 16
Ontario 1945 Lib - 66 Pro - 16 Con - 8
Ontario 1948 Lib - 53 Pro - 23 Con - 14
Ontario 1951 Lib - 79 Pro - 8 SC - 2 Con - 1
Ontario 1955 Lib - 84 Pro - 11 SC - 3
Quebec and the Feds are saved for later  Premier lists to come out soon. I've decided to make 1957 as a "turning point" year, hence the story will advance to that point shortly (within a day or so) and then I will stop and take a look back at what I've written so far. As I get into the future, things become more and more open to chance. Hence after 1957 I will open the floor to suggestions, and by the time we get to 2009, I might be running on suggestions alone! I have a few ideas though to get me though to that point that I think are solid; regardless, we'll see where this goes.
|
|
|
|
|
8056
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / International What-ifs / Re: Canada: What if the Progressives displaced the Liberals? (Or the Tories!)
|
on: September 04, 2009, 05:32:35 am
|
|
The Liberal government would last until 1923 due to limited Progressive and Tory support.
The election was a huge morale killer for the Tories. Many of their left-wing members left for the Progressives and never looked back.
Provincial politics also changed as a result. The government of Ontario lead by the United Farmers, officially re branded themselves as the Ontario Progressives and united with Labour members. The United Farmers of Alberta, also in government did the same. A Progressive majority government was further elected in Manitoba in 1922.
The 1923 Ontario provincial election proved a disaster for the Conservatives. Attempting a comeback, they failed miserably, and lost seats from the previous election. Pro - 55 Lib - 34 Con - 22 The Progressives, despite some unpopularity, were able to cobble together a Minority government.
The 1923 Quebec provincial election also saw the Conservatives falter, but not by as much.
Lib - 64 Pro - 12 Con - 9
The 1923 Prince Edward Island provincial election saw the first Progressives elected to the provincial legislature. Only here were the Conservatives able to hold on to some degree.
Lib - 15 Con - 14 Pro - 1
The 1923 federal election saw a rebound in Liberal fortunes as the expense of the Conservative Party. Anti-Progressive voters gathered behind the Liberals, and despite gaining votes, the Progressives lost seats. It was the Conservatives, however, who were decimated, falling below the 12 seats required for party status.
Lib - 128 - 43% Pro - 97 - 36% Con - 10 - 17%
The election granted the Liberals a comfortable Majority, but also killed the hope of the Conservative Party. One of their seats came from the remote north. All 9 of their remaining seats came from one province, Ontario. Supporters of the party continues to branch off; more left wing supporters joined the Progressives, joined by increasing number of left-wing Liberals, while right-wing Conservatives either stayed with the party or joined the Liberals to help stop the Progressive tide.
Provincial elections continued the tide of Progressive-from-Conservative votes.
Prince Edward Island was the first to go, due to the small majority gained there in the last election. Islanders were not yet ready to trust the Progressives, but had given up on the Conservatives. The 1924 election saw the following results:
Lib - 26 Pro - 3 Con - 1
British Columbia went to the polls in 1924 as well. Under the name the "Provincial Party" and in an electoral coalition with Labour, the BC Progressives were able to burst on to the scene, displacing the Conservatives as the #2 party.
Lib - 25 Pro - 17 Con - 6
In Early 1925 the Ontario government fell apart, and an election was held that saw the Progressives gain a large majority. The Conservatives, however, were able to make a strong stand, and displaced the Liberals, giving some hope to Tories nationwide.
Pro - 74 Con - 23 Lib - 15
Mid 1925 saw Nova Scotia elect a new assembly. Demands for change were strong, but the Progressives were not fully trusted. the result was was one that would give Tories even more hope.
Con - 20 Pro - 19 Lib - 4
The result of this election was a coalition between the Conservatives and the Liberals, that remained stable for years.
Late in 1925, Saskatchewan went to the polls. The Liberals continued to hold on to government here.
Lib - 50 Pro - 10 Con - 3
1926 saw an election in Alberta. The Progressives won re-election easily. Their government continued to be very popular.
Pro - 54 Lib - 8
Prior to the federal election in 1927, Quebec went to the polls. The result was painful for all but the Liberals.
Lib - 79 Pro - 4 Con - 2
The 1927 Federal Election saw a minor bounce for the Conservatives in terms of seats. They increased their seat count in Ontario, and they were able to pick up a few ridings in Nova Scotia, and even one in Quebec, however their nation-wide popular vote continued to drop
Lib - 126 - 45% Pro - 91 - 37% Con - 28 - 16%
|
|
|
|
|
8057
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / International What-ifs / Re: Canada: What if the Progressives displaced the Liberals?
|
on: September 04, 2009, 04:38:45 am
|
1921 election: First, I note the fracture of the vote. The Progressive Party was, in short, a coalition between various United Farmer and Labour groups. Some candidates still ran for the Labour Party despite this. In order for this timeline to work, we will assume all ran under the Progressive banner. There are many ridings that did not run a Progressive candidate. This makes it difficult yet also easy to change history. BC in particular did not have many Progressives (or Labour etc) running. I therefore have upped those ridings with said candidates to help them win. There are cases where the progressive candidate got, for example, 39 votes, compared to the winners 10,493. Clearly this is not a riding that's going to switch, but where the difference is within a few thousand, I've switched the riding over. Ridings that switched. BC: Kootney Easy. New Westminster. Nanimo. Vancouver South. AB: Progressives already won every seat in the province. SK: Regina MB: Winnipeg North (Won by a "Socialist", who then went on to sit with the Progressives Hop, Skip, and a Jump. NB: Kent See interesting note below NS: Inverness. Cape Breton South and Richmond (two MPs) PEI: none (no ridings close enough) YK: none (no progressive candidate)
Note on Kent: In 1997, the NDP won the riding of Kent-Westmorland. This win was on the strength of the candidate within Westmorland county. Kent, as a whole, has never, never, voted anything but Liberal (federally OR provincially), and is the only place in Canada I can find that's done that. I am truly shocked to find that in 1921 the Progressives took over 40% of the vote here, and could have won with a little boost from alternate history. Now down to the "Big 2" provinces. QC: Yamaska only riding in the province that the Progressives even got close to ON: Bruce North. Essex South. Oxford North. Carlton. Durham. Elgin East. Elgin West. Fort William and Rainy River. Grey North. Hamilton East. Hamilton West. Hastings East. Lambton West. Lincoln. Northumberland. Oxford South. Parry Sound. Peel. Prince Edward. Simcoe South. Toronto East. Wentworth. -- Also, the Independent elected for Victoria later switched to the Progressives. We are assuming he did so now.
I'm surprised how many close ridings there were in Ontario where the Tories just edged out the Progressives. I think this clearly shows that we cannot kill the Liberals. We must kill the Tories. Anyways, here's the alternate history results table: 
|
|
|
|
|
8058
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: All about yourself!
|
on: September 04, 2009, 03:14:04 am
|
|
Hey all. I used to post here over 3 years ago but cant remember my login name much less my password, so I just created a new me (I am very different than I was at that time, for one thing I was only 87.5% of my current age)
Lemme answer some of these Gender: Male Age: 24 Race/ethnic composition: Acadian/Italian Religion: Monotheist Height: 5'7" Weight: 230 lbs perhaps? Location: Toronto, Ontario Occupation: Security Guard Party of Choice: Liberal Party of Canada.... or Maybe the Green Party of Canada... Or maybe the Tories... Favorite color: Blue Your other interests: Politics, Maps, Public Transit, Highways Do you live by yourself: I have one roomate. What city did you grow up in? Summerside PEI Have you ever been attracted to someone of the same sex? No How awesome would you rate yourself?: I am Emperor Awesome
|
|
|
|
|
8059
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / International What-ifs / Canada: What if the Progressives displaced the Liberals? (Or the Tories!)
|
on: September 04, 2009, 02:48:21 am
|
|
Edit - As seen below, it actually makes more sense due to factors of history to have the Progressives replace the Tories (not the Liberals) and in stead have the Liberals move to the right, creating an Australian-like situation in Canada.
I'm surprised no one posted this yet.
Background. In the United Kingdom, and many other European nations, during the period from 1900 to 1930, Social Democratic and pro-Labour parties replaced many big and small L Liberal parties as the main opposition tot the various type of Conservative parties out there. In Canada this did not happen because, in short, the Liberal Party of Canada was able to absorb many of the Progressive Party's MP's, policies, and voters, moving it to the left of other "Liberal Parties" and keeping it cemented as Canada's largest Left of Centre party. In 1933 nearly the entire Progressive delegation in Parliament (IE it's MPs) and nearly all its MLAs defected to the new CCF party, which later became the NDP. Due to the fact that most of these MPs were from rural Alberta, most were not re-elected to represent the CCF.
Change: The change would be that in the 1921 election, the Progressives managed a wider victory. I will post a table in my second post (directly below this one) about this. Regardless, the new, larger Progressive caucus decides not to work with the Liberals but to oppose them as the official opposition.
Result: This is where I need help. What would have happened? I see one of two paths: A - The Progressives keep a steady vote while the Conservative Party raises, and the Liberals get squeezed out. B - The Conservatives never recover. They are replaced on the right by Social Credit out west, and remain a very small party existing only in certain provinces.
Theories: Pierre Trudeau started out in the CCF/NDP and only switched to the Liberals just before getting elected. As the story goes, a high-placed Liberal saw how skilled he was and asked him "How would you like to be Prime Minister" and secured him a riding. My theory is that Trudeau hence would have been a Progressive and not a Liberal if said party was in a position to win.
Thoughts: The story would progress easier if it were the Conservatives who had died off. Many of the "Tory" leaders from 1930-2003 were 'red' Tories, and could well have fit into a right-shifted Liberal Party with ease. Also, the Conservatives remaining off the stage would have allowed for Social Credit to remain a force. Remember, Preston Manning ran for Social Credit decades before he founded Reform. The CCF changed its name to the NDP, so there is no reason why Social Credit could not change its name to Reform, etc.
I'd like to turn this into one of those "Stories" that are in the american what-if forums. Id like to see what Canada would look like today if this had happened.
|
|
|
|
|
|