Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 03, 2015, 06:50:09 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 172
1  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Congressional Elections / Re: WV-03: Tomblin considering on: April 29, 2015, 11:04:15 pm
FWIW, he carried it by 12% in 2012:



If I didn't know any better, I would've guessed that Rahall would've won by 12% just by looking at that map.  He wins all but three counties, yet the election was within single digits. 
2  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Rep. Steve Knight to Protester: "I'll Drop Your Ass" on: April 29, 2015, 10:23:50 pm
FF
3  Atlas Fantasy Elections / Regional Governments / Re: MW1: Fifth Most Serene Republic of the Midwest Constitution on: April 26, 2015, 04:30:21 pm
I guess I'll propose that amendment since there are no comments on it

Quote from: Amendment
b)   The Chief Judicial Officer is to be appointed by the Governor and must be confirmed by a unanimous Althing vote. He or she shall have a term of four years.

c) The Chief Judicial Officer will continue to hold this office until he or she resigns or is removed
.]

Sounds fine to me. 
4  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: To all of our Hillary fans on: April 26, 2015, 01:54:45 am
Does it look like this?


5  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Have people forgotten about Rick Perry? on: April 25, 2015, 11:59:39 pm
Who?
6  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: What exactly will Republicans run on? on: April 25, 2015, 11:58:09 pm
Hillary does not have less baggage than Obama.

Thanks for calling in.  Care to explain that position? 
7  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / What exactly will Republicans run on? on: April 25, 2015, 11:44:21 pm
How exactly will they topple Hillary?  By attacking her family ties/Benghazi involvement?  By taking advantage of voter fatigue?  

Republicans mercilessly attacked Obama for every misstep and perceived weakness in his record and still lost by a convincing margin in 2012.  How in the world do they stand a chance against Hillary, who arguably has less baggage (considering she's not an incumbent with mediocre job approval ratings, and thus has no such record to criticize) than Barack?  

Thoughts?  
8  Atlas Fantasy Elections / Regional Governments / Re: MW2: Heating Fuel Reduction Bill on: April 21, 2015, 03:25:50 pm
BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP BUMP
9  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / SURPRISE! Some policemen are good people on: April 20, 2015, 09:56:22 pm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/19/jesse-kidder-police-officer_n_7097618.html

Quote
A rookie officer in Ohio was caught on video refusing to shoot the suspect wanted in two murders -- even as the distraught man repeatedly charges him and demands to be shot.

Several times, Wilcox rushes at Kidder. Each time, Kidder runs backward while keeping his handgun aimed at the suspect, urging him to surrender.

"Shoot me!" Wilcox cries out. "Shoot me."

"No man," Kidder replies. "I'm not gonna do it."


At one point, Kidder appears to fall to the ground but remains in control of the situation, ordering the suspect to back up. Eventually, Wilcox surrenders.

inb4 sheltered teenage boys.  And good work Officer Kidder!  Cheesy
10  Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Inappropriate content on the forum on: April 20, 2015, 09:13:27 pm
every baseball stat you consume will begin to look like a kissing lesbian couple engaging in threesomes with all kinds if characters

I for one welcome this utopia.


Yes, Snowguy, my observation that this forum could do with fewer teenage boys analyzing the women with whom they would have sex
11  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections / Re: Predict the 2018 Gubernatorial Results on: April 19, 2015, 02:01:35 am
Being cautious:



Alaska may be a tossup if it's between their current INDY governor and a GOP candidate.  This map assumes he doesn't run again. 
12  Atlas Fantasy Elections / Voting Booth / Re: April 2015 At-large Senate Election on: April 19, 2015, 01:42:41 am
[1] Lief

[2] Blair

[3] Poirot

[4] NCY

[5] Polnut

[6]  Cris
13  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Congressional Elections / Re: WI-Marquette: Feingold (D) with dominant lead against Sen. Johnson (R) on: April 17, 2015, 03:56:20 am
It's a nice lead, but you never know what might happen.  I'm putting this at tilt D. 
14  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / U.S. Presidential Election Results / Re: when did missouri cease being a swing state? on: April 16, 2015, 09:33:01 pm
For context, here is how Missouri margins have trended in the past few elections:

1988: D+3.75%
1992: D+4.59%
1996: R+2.22%
2000: R+3.86%
2004: R+4.74%
2008: R+7.39%
2012: R+13.22%
I don't know where you are pulling that 2008 number out of. John McCain won by 4000 votes.

He means MO was 7.39% points more Republican than the nation as a whole. 
15  Atlas Fantasy Elections / Regional Governments / Re: MW2: Heating Fuel Reduction Bill on: April 16, 2015, 09:30:15 pm
How much revenue will we loose?  That's my only concern. 
16  Atlas Fantasy Elections / Regional Governments / Re: MW1: Fifth Most Serene Republic of the Midwest Constitution on: April 16, 2015, 09:29:06 pm
I don't have any objections. 
17  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Rate Hillary's chances of winning the 2016 Presidential election on: April 15, 2015, 06:50:20 pm
55%, maybe slightly more. 
18  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / U.S. Presidential Election Results / Re: Nixon vs. Humphrey vs. Wallace Today on: April 13, 2015, 03:43:51 pm
For the last time, George Wallace was not right-wing.  Being a racist does not make you a conservative; ask William Jennings Bryan and Woodrow Wilson about that.

George Wallace was much more "pro business" than he said.  Besides, he endorsed Dole in 1996, didn't he? 
19  Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: I'm kind of disgusted with you people right now on: April 12, 2015, 01:33:43 pm
F(inks) it, just permaban everyone involved.  This is messed up.   
20  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Rand Paul: If Hillary cares about women's rights, she will boycott Saudi Arabia on: April 12, 2015, 01:25:23 pm
Well, Rand Paul doesn't make women's right the top priority of his campaign. That's the difference.

Some Libertarian he is, then. 
21  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Rand Paul: If Hillary cares about women's rights, she will boycott Saudi Arabia on: April 12, 2015, 01:19:07 pm
Quote
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Sunday attacked Hillary Clinton for donations that her family foundation accepted from Saudi Arabia, sticking to his plan of attacking the former secretary of state's character during his presidential bid.

Quote
"I think I would expect Hillary Clinton if she believes in women's rights, she should be calling for a boycott of Saudi Arabia. Instead, she's accepting tens of millions of dollars. And I think it looks unseemly. And there's going to be some explaining she's going to have to come up with," he said.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/12/rand-paul-hillary-clinton_n_7049486.html


Then he says that he himself WOULDN'T boycott Saudi Arabia.  Does that mean that Rand Paul doesn't care about women's rights?  I love how he criticizes Hillary for hypocrisy while obviously  holding double standards for her.  I'm not sure if he's really this much of a moron, or if he thinks that he can just get away with these statements without anyone criticizing him (or a mix of both). 
22  Questions and Answers / The Atlas / Re: Why No Alaska Maps? on: April 11, 2015, 10:43:12 pm
You mean maps like these?


23  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: I see West Virginia being a lean D for Clinton on: April 11, 2015, 09:01:46 pm
I think WV will be competitive in 2020. I mean, look, it is already happening: The part of WV that borders solid D Virginia, is already trending Democratic. LOOK:




Can you see the red dot there? FAIRFAX COUNTY ALL OVER AGAIN !!!!!!111!!!!
#READYFORBATTLEGROUNDWESTVIRGINIA
#GOSOLIDDVIRGINIA!!!!
What is that map of anyways? 2014 Senate by legislative district? 2012 President by legislative district?

This.


Nope, I made that map.  It's of the 2012 presidential Election by LD. 

Sorry. Sad I thought that it was from 2014 because the results in that area were quite close, too and Obama is much more unpopular than Tennant, so...

Don't worry about it.  Wink
24  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / What percentage will Hillary get of the white vote? on: April 11, 2015, 08:28:39 pm
Go
25  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Even Hillary's critics admit she's inevitable on: April 11, 2015, 08:17:20 pm
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 172


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines