Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 31, 2015, 10:21:37 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 1163
1  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Walker: building a wall on Canadian border is worth considering on: August 30, 2015, 04:22:24 pm
Why doesn't he lead the nation in his wonderful new plan, and start building now in Wisconsin?

Because Wisconsin doesn't border Canada? lol

Yeah I think he is done atm. The only candidates with a chance at this point are Bush, Cruz, Rubio, Paul, and Kasich

You seriously still include Paul? Roll Eyes

Sit down, kid. The grown-ups are talking.

I'm assuming he was referring to the general election, in which Paul is definitely electable (though recent polls show him doing worse now), he's just not electable in the primary.

Cruz is listed and isn't electable in the general election, though.
2  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: WV-Orion Strategies: Generic Republican leads Clinton by 32 points (!) on: August 28, 2015, 11:01:10 am
Losing Lean D WV to Safe R would be bad, but they flipped VA from Safe R to Lean D in the process which is a net gain.
3  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Hillary Clinton compares pro-lifers to terrorist groups on: August 27, 2015, 05:05:42 pm
Pro-Abortionists in a tizzy again!
4  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Have we missed Trump's peak? on: August 25, 2015, 03:55:18 pm
Trump's peak is going to be 100%, when he's the only candidate left on the ballot as presumptive nominee.
5  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls / Re: NH-PPP: Sanders and Trump ahead on: August 25, 2015, 09:09:08 am
No Biden? Junk polL!

Glorious news on Republican side, tho.
6  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Would Biden's "flirting" be an issue? on: August 25, 2015, 09:01:58 am
Donald Trump is going to be his opponent. It's not an issue.
7  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Do you think Fiorina will be in the main CNN debate next month? on: August 24, 2015, 03:54:03 pm
CNN's formula is terrible. She definitely should. She's third in NH apparently.
8  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Can Trump just implode already? on: August 24, 2015, 12:12:02 pm
Propaganda has consequences.
9  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: My concession on electability on: August 23, 2015, 10:22:54 am
If Jeb and Rubio can't get their own party to vote for them in the primaries, they're not electable.
10  Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Anyone else just get another password reset email? on: August 22, 2015, 06:47:35 pm
Probably Hillary trying to shut the place down for dissent against her rise
11  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Trump is the leading candidate for White Evangelicals on: August 22, 2015, 02:08:30 pm
He's a really good preacher
12  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: MI-Mitchell: Hillary trails! on: August 21, 2015, 02:41:00 pm
the poll board should be on an episode of Hoarders with all the trash in it these days smh
13  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Warren/Dean ticket on: August 21, 2015, 10:35:07 am
no
14  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Who do you most want to see drop out? on: August 21, 2015, 08:58:44 am
Every Republican but Trump.
15  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Donald Trump Wary of Grover Norquist's No Tax Increase Pledge on: August 21, 2015, 08:39:35 am
En-f**king-dorsed
16  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: New Video of Planned Parenthood Delivering Live Baby and Killing For Brain Tissu on: August 20, 2015, 02:01:40 pm
People make and possess child pornography even though it's illegal, but somehow pro-choicers don't think that's a valid reason to legalize it.


I'm against making cameras and photography classes illegal to stop child pornography, just as I'm against making trained medical professionals and sex education literature illegal to stop abortion.

What?

A world where abortion is illegal (see pre-1960s America) is also a world where it is illegal to talk about considering abortion. This means taking abortion away from doctors and educational outlets like Planned Parenthood, into the hands of profit motive black market abortionists whose motives aren't planning, but to sell as many abortions as possible and whose motives after the act aren't for scientific research but, again, to sell as much tissue as possible.

Banning abortion isn't banning abortion. It's banning medical, educational, and scientific discussion of abortion. Pro-choice is banning abortion, as in banning abortionists, and providing legal protection to the science.edu community.

If I'm a shrewd pro-abortionist businessman looking to make serious amounts of profit margin in the selling fetal tissue, the gameplan in starting a pro-abortionist movement in my favor would be:

(1) campaign to pass educational reforms to abstinence only education, to increase the amount of unwanted pregnancies out of the public school system
(2) campaign to ban late term abortions and speed up the process so uncertain prospective are pressured into making an immediate decision under less emotional circumstances
(3) campaign to reduce the number of abortion clinics in local areas to consolidate competition and strengthen bargaining power
(4) campaign to phase out federal funding to increase clinic financial stress to sell tissue
(5) campaign to expose these practices, causing there to be trust issues with unknown competition and driving up costs

The only thing that needs to stay legal is the rape/incest clause, a window allowing the possession of the tissue to exist, but by cutting federal funding and restricting everything else, it makes tissue acquisition in a black market highly profitable for the abortionist.

It wouldn't surprise me if vocal Pro-Abortionists in this thread like DC Al Fine and Jacobtm have some retirement money invested away in these kind of businesses.
17  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls / Re: WI-Marquette: Walker and Clinton ahead on: August 20, 2015, 01:10:25 pm
Trump under 10?
Junk.

But even if true, that's a weak showing for a favorite son.
18  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Carly Fiorina: Everyone should have to take citizenship test on: August 20, 2015, 12:55:06 pm
If passing a standard citizenship test was required for voting, would more Republicans or Democrats be disqualified?

Democrats, for sure.

What makes you say that?

He's conservative.
19  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: FL/OH/PA Quinnipiac: Clinton in big trouble on: August 20, 2015, 10:12:08 am
Wow, another Quinnipiac poll contradicting everyone else.
20  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Bush shifts strategy: goes after Trump as "long-term Democrat" on: August 20, 2015, 10:10:38 am
Trump is going to have Jeb's balls pickled in a jar on his mantle.
21  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Trump Effect: Jeb Bush calls for greater enforcement against ‘anchor babies’ on: August 20, 2015, 09:56:06 am
Trump is literally going to bend Jeb over his knee and give him a spanking at the end of this.
22  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: New Video of Planned Parenthood Delivering Live Baby and Killing For Brain Tissu on: August 20, 2015, 09:01:57 am
People make and possess child pornography even though it's illegal, but somehow pro-choicers don't think that's a valid reason to legalize it.


I'm against making cameras and photography classes illegal to stop child pornography, just as I'm against making trained medical professionals and sex education literature illegal to stop abortion.
23  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: New Video of Planned Parenthood Delivering Live Baby and Killing For Brain Tissu on: August 19, 2015, 10:23:02 pm
I've been ignoring watching whatever these Planned Parenthood videos are for awhile, but now that I have... wow. What a bunch of morons the outraged are.

Living tissues don't require a functioning brain to move. Especially primitive living tissue.

Here's a Japanese girl eating a "live frog" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWgdLKfkxss

TIP: The frog is not alive.

That fetus is not a live baby.

Of course, people who are against planned parenthood are also vehemently ignorant of science so there's no way to convince that thing is not living. They also thought Terry Schiavo was alive when she was dead as a doornail.

You claim post-coma unresponsiveness is the same as being "dead as a doornail" while accusing others of scientific ignorance ?

I don't claim post-coma unresponsiveness being the same as being dead as a doornail. I claim Terry Schiavo, whose brain IIRC was only the third the size of a normal adult human when she was taken off support, as being dead as a doornail.
24  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: New Video of Planned Parenthood Delivering Live Baby and Killing For Brain Tissu on: August 19, 2015, 10:16:19 pm
I've been ignoring watching whatever these Planned Parenthood videos are for awhile, but now that I have... wow. What a bunch of morons the outraged are.

Living tissues don't require a functioning brain to move. Especially primitive living tissue.

Here's a Japanese girl eating a "live frog" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWgdLKfkxss

TIP: The frog is not alive.

That fetus is not a live baby.

Of course, people who are against planned parenthood are also vehemently ignorant of science so there's no way to convince that thing is not living. They also thought Terry Schiavo was alive when she was dead as a doornail.


Yes, all people who don't agree with such barbarism are idiots.

Just out of curiosity, are these scientifically illiterate people in support of Bernie Sanders's crusade against evil GMOs as well?

I'm pro-GMO and I don't support Bernie Sanders either, so you're barking up the wrong tree.
25  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: NC-PPP: Close race with slight Republican edge on: August 19, 2015, 06:33:19 pm
We need to do some sort of scientific brain study to find out what the hell voters see in Ben Carson.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 1163


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines