Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 28, 2016, 03:40:15 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 212
101  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Clinton: “I Feel Sorry For Young People Who Believe Sanders” on: April 04, 2016, 04:53:14 pm
Assuming Sanders did become President, the same fanatical supporters backing him now would end up hating him when he couldn't get any of his plans through a Republican House. Sanders knows that he is overpromising and that is really the wrong thing to do.
102  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Bernie refuses to release tax returns, blames his wife on: April 03, 2016, 03:55:29 pm
He doesn't seem to have any money outside of his Congressional salary, so I'm not sure why he doesn't want to release his returns.
103  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Does Trump have a chance in NV and/or NM? on: April 01, 2016, 11:41:51 pm
I think both of those states are off the table due to sizable Hispanic populations.
104  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Trump refuses to rule out using nukes in Europe on: March 31, 2016, 11:37:06 pm
Trump should not have the nuclear codes. Period.
105  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: DC Democratic party "forgets" to get Bernie on the ballot on: March 30, 2016, 09:28:09 pm
Why would anyone bother to pull a stunt in a primary that has only 20 pledged delegates and is not great territory for Sanders? Seems like an odd place for a "conspiracy".

Then why did this happen? Also yes every person that is in an election should be on the ballot and if this happened to Clinton i would want her on as well.

Perhaps because it was an error and nothing nefarious? A stunt over a very limited amount of pledged delegates makes no sense. If this was New York or California then maybe it would be suspect, but not District of Columbia.
106  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: DC Democratic party "forgets" to get Bernie on the ballot on: March 30, 2016, 09:11:16 pm
Why would anyone bother to pull a stunt in a primary that has only 20 pledged delegates and is not great territory for Sanders? Seems like an odd place for a "conspiracy".
107  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: A Bernie Sanders Supporter Confronted a Superdelegate — Then Leaked Their Convo on: March 30, 2016, 11:07:02 am
The riot comment was out of line.
108  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Clinton Strategist: No More Debates Unless Bernie Sanders Changes His Tone. on: March 30, 2016, 10:34:37 am
What is there left to say? There have been so many debates and town halls that it would really be redundant to have another debate. I can't imagine that Sanders would not use a debate to go on the attack, since repeating his stump speech wouldn't do much good at this point.
109  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: DC Madame Scandal - Who Is It? on: March 30, 2016, 12:22:56 am
I think it's a bluff.
110  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET) on: March 26, 2016, 02:19:33 pm
If he can make margins this big in these states + CA + most of the remaining states -MD and NY, then we might be onto something.

Maybe if those states were caucuses, but they are primaries.
111  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET) on: March 26, 2016, 01:44:36 pm
Sanders needs to keep Clinton under viability in Washington in order to make a big dent in the delegate count.



There are a 101 delegates in Washington, if Sanders won all of them that would narrow the delegate gap by 100. That would be a lot better than narrowing it by only a few dozen. The point is a win means nothing to the delegate math unless it actually changes the count significantly.
112  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET) on: March 26, 2016, 01:40:21 pm
Sanders needs to keep Clinton under viability in Washington in order to make a big dent in the delegate count.
113  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: BREAKING: Cheatin' Ted caught with FIVE mistresses! on: March 24, 2016, 11:08:28 pm
I don't believe this at all.
114  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Cruz will control Lousiana delegation despite TRUMP win on: March 24, 2016, 07:15:54 pm
This is going to do nothing but cause physical fights at the convention. Even if Cruz is able to secure the nomination through scheming, he will be very damaged going into the general.
115  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Opinions on a Scott Walker nomination at a contested convention on: March 24, 2016, 03:46:30 pm
The unions would mobilize against him heavily and he'd be defeated across the Midwest.
116  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls / Re: CA-PPIC: Trump +11, Clinton +7 on: March 24, 2016, 12:10:46 am
Sanders will most certainly win Humboldt and Mendocino, as well as the entire rural north and Gold Rush counties.
117  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections / Re: Alabama Gov. Bentley had affair with former staffer on: March 24, 2016, 12:02:21 am
He's termed out and it's not likely he would move up since Shelby and Sessions are not leaving any time soon. Not really a big deal.
118  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Whitehouse.gov receiving petition to redo Arizona vote. on: March 23, 2016, 06:50:05 pm
Are there people who actually think that there will actually be a redo? That would cost far too much money and time.
119  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Who would win a Sanders-Trump debate? on: March 22, 2016, 06:33:04 pm
It's not so much that Trump would win, it's just that he would force Sanders to play defense on tax increases. As we have seen in the primary, Trump has been able to damage his opponents in debates.
120  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders on topless protester: "I was trying very hard to get every detail" on: March 22, 2016, 05:24:48 pm
Let him be. At 74, thrills like this are few and far between for him.
121  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Bill Clinton criticizes the "awful legacy" of the last 8 years on: March 21, 2016, 11:29:49 pm
This is weak, really weak.
122  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders not running out of money: He's on track to raise 50-60 Mio. $ in March on: March 19, 2016, 05:04:53 pm
BTW, doesn't the fact that Sanders is soundly beaten almost everywhere by Clinton despite the fact that he outspends her kinda undermines his message about money in politics?

It really does.
123  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders not running out of money: He's on track to raise 50-60 Mio. $ in March on: March 19, 2016, 11:58:42 am
Every time he loses it seems like people just donate more to his campaign.
124  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Bernie Sanders be gracious in defeat? on: March 18, 2016, 08:11:43 pm
Sanders abruptly walked out of an interview when the reporter asked about his wife meeting with Joe Arpaio

You're making it sound like Jane Sanders and Joe Arpaio have political agreement, I'm just wondering if this deception is intentional or incidental?

Why did Sanders feel the need to abruptly leave an interview over such a simple question? That's my point.

Just to clarify, was your deception intentional or incidental?

What is your problem? I wasn't being deceptive, that your misinterpretation. I was wondering why Jane Sanders was meeting with Arpaio in the first place, but for Sanders to throw a diva fit about a mere question made me question it even more. Considering that Arpaio is a right-wing nut, it's fitting that there would be questions about the meeting. I never said anyone had an agreement.
125  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Bernie Sanders be gracious in defeat? on: March 18, 2016, 07:59:04 pm
Sanders abruptly walked out of an interview when the reporter asked about his wife meeting with Joe Arpaio

You're making it sound like Jane Sanders and Joe Arpaio have political agreement, I'm just wondering if this deception is intentional or incidental?

Why did Sanders feel the need to abruptly leave an interview over such a simple question? That's my point.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 212


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines