Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2016, 09:13:23 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 211
101  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 08:20:56 pm
And another:

Quote
Considering how much lives we think Bernie will save, would it be immoral to theoretically assassinate hillary clinton to cement bernie as the nominee?

Wow. Insanity.
102  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 07:41:57 pm
NYT called Ohio for Clinton.
103  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 07:34:18 pm
If these numbers in Ohio actually hold, it would be a stunning win for Clinton.
104  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 07:02:38 pm
I don't see what Hillary's appeal is.
She is the best qualified candidate.
105  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 06:51:05 pm
This comment on r/sandersforpresident has made my day:

Quote
I gave him $65,000...now I feel like I wasted my time.

I really hope that person is being sarcastic.
106  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 06:44:33 pm
Clinton up 71-27 in Ohio so far.
107  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 06:31:27 pm
Ohio exit poll is 53% Clinton, 46% Sanders

North Carolina is 54% Clinton, 42% Sanders
108  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 06:26:56 pm
The results should get better for Sanders when the Panhandle reports, but probably not a whole lot better.
109  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 06:21:21 pm
Seems like there is a lot of protest vote in the more conservative counties in Florida so far.
110  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 06:15:22 pm
Clinton is winning big in Florida and totally crushing Sanders. 62-35 is not really that good for Sanders.
111  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 05:29:37 pm
I'm thinking Bernie will win all the northern states and come within single digits in either FL or NC. Just a gut feeling though. Then again, I had a gut feeling he would win Michigan too. We'll see Smiley

Not happening.

I'm thinking Bernie will win all the northern states and come within single digits in either FL or NC. Just a gut feeling though. Then again, I had a gut feeling he would win Michigan too. We'll see Smiley

Based on the Florida exit poll, Sanders would probably be lucky to come within 20 in Florida.

Wow, you are really being Hillary hacks.
112  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 05:07:58 pm
Even if Sanders does carry some states, it doesn't look like he's going to duplicate his win in Vermont anywhere. I think people need to remember that this is a delegate game, not a how many states won game.
113  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET) on: March 15, 2016, 05:01:17 pm
I have a feeling that Sanders will declare victory no matter what happens tonight.
114  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Most likely neither Hillary nor Trump will be their party's nominee. on: March 15, 2016, 04:41:29 pm
Whether or not he generates more enthusiasm is questionable. So far, the primaries have had fairly low turnout and Sanders does not seem to be sparking the level of new participation that came to fruition in 2008. The delegate numbers make it incredibly difficult for him to win the nomination and it gets no easier for him to catch up. He'd have to post some New Hampshire type victories in the remaining larger states, because as we saw with Michigan a barely there win didn't do him much good in the delegate count.

Washington is the next biggest delegate prize that leans toward him as it's caucus and has plenty of liberal voters. It's possible that he could keep Clinton under viability there.
115  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders' best county in Florida? on: March 15, 2016, 11:10:04 am
Holmes.

Yeah.... I don't think conservadems are gonna vote for Sanders up there.

Considering the trends so far in the south, it's no outside of the equation. His best counties in southern states have been the most Republican ones for the most part.
116  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders: I ran as a Democrat to get media coverage on: March 15, 2016, 11:03:34 am
This is why is integrity and authenticity isn't superior. He fashioned himself an outsider, yet he ran in a major party primary for convenience. If it was all about the message he would have run as an independent and really tried to make it work.

I know you're just a dumb hack and I'm taking the bait by responding to this, but he's not fashioning himself as an outsider, his brand is that he hasn't changed on the issues over decades along with the rest of the so-called libs.  Has he really done that by putting a D next to his name?

Your comment about running as an independent is super-duper dumb.  It's not only about the message, it's about policy outcomes.  In a plurality voting system like the United States, you have to run under the umbrella of one of the two major parties or else you 1) have no chance for winning and 2) play spoiler for the Republicans.  You think it would be more admirable and consistent with his beliefs if he ran as an independent and tried to throw the election to a Republican?

Calling someone dumb is a poor comeback, it really is. I'm not being a dumb hack, I'm calling out the opportunism. For years, Sanders has made statements that would suggests that he questions the integrity of the Democratic Party. If one has an issue with the integrity of a party, why would you join it? It reeks of opportunism. If your message is strong enough to run on it's own, run as an independent. At this point it doesn't even matter, because he's far behind in the delegate count and he has pretty much lost self-identified Democrats everywhere.
117  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders: I ran as a Democrat to get media coverage on: March 15, 2016, 10:30:28 am
This is why is integrity and authenticity isn't superior. He fashioned himself an outsider, yet he ran in a major party primary for convenience. If it was all about the message he would have run as an independent and really tried to make it work.
118  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Is Hillary over if Sanders wins North Carolina? on: March 15, 2016, 12:01:49 am
Not at all, because Clinton would still maintain the delegate advantage. And considering that Sanders didn't do well in Virginia which has a number of liberals like North Carolina, I don't see an upset on the horizon. North Carolina is no better than any of the southern states for Sanders and has far too many black voters for him to even get close.

I certainly agree that Clinton will likely win the NC Primary, but liberals in NOVA aren't exactly the same type of liberals you have in the Triangle or Asheville.  Also I think Bernie will do fairly well with black voters in Durham, which isn't just staunchly Democratic, but is flat out liberal white and black.

Perhaps, but so far the patterns we have seen in the south is that Sanders performs better in areas that are far removed from the more liberal and Democratic areas. We'll see what happens.
119  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Is Hillary over if Sanders wins North Carolina? on: March 14, 2016, 11:24:32 pm
Not at all, because Clinton would still maintain the delegate advantage. And considering that Sanders didn't do well in Virginia which has a number of liberals like North Carolina, I don't see an upset on the horizon. North Carolina is no better than any of the southern states for Sanders and has far too many black voters for him to even get close.
120  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders' best county in Florida? on: March 14, 2016, 09:02:05 pm
Holmes.
121  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Attacker yells "Trump, Trump!" as he attacks Muslim student & Hispanic man on: March 14, 2016, 07:03:32 pm
Being called a mean word by some hick is not "an attack."

The article clearly states that there was a beating.
122  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: ***MSNBC Democratic Townhall - March 14th - Ohio & Illinois - 6-8pm ET*** on: March 14, 2016, 06:43:39 pm
Foreign policy really is an issue that has exceptions. People want Clinton to promise to never ever use military action, but that's not really a promise anyone running for President should make.
123  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: PA-Mercyhurst University: Kasich/Rubio ahead of Clinton/Sanders on: March 14, 2016, 02:17:51 pm
Candidate who aren't going to win the nomination always seem to perform better in early general election polls.

Obama also polled better than Hillary in the GE during March 2008 and he won the nomination ...

I'm talking about polling right now and more as it pertains to Republicans. Kasich is the best polling Republican, yet he has no chance at the nomination.
124  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: PA-Mercyhurst University: Kasich/Rubio ahead of Clinton/Sanders on: March 14, 2016, 02:02:47 pm
Candidate who aren't going to win the nomination always seem to perform better in early general election polls.
125  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls / Re: ARG: Trump swamps Rubio in Florida; Kasich, Clinton lead in Ohio on: March 14, 2016, 01:41:01 pm
How stupid are the people of Florida??

Smart enough not to elect an uneducated homosexual again.

What on earth?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 211


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines