Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2016, 02:54:05 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Election 2016 predictions are now open!.

  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 211
76  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET) on: March 26, 2016, 02:19:33 pm
If he can make margins this big in these states + CA + most of the remaining states -MD and NY, then we might be onto something.

Maybe if those states were caucuses, but they are primaries.
77  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET) on: March 26, 2016, 01:44:36 pm
Sanders needs to keep Clinton under viability in Washington in order to make a big dent in the delegate count.



There are a 101 delegates in Washington, if Sanders won all of them that would narrow the delegate gap by 100. That would be a lot better than narrowing it by only a few dozen. The point is a win means nothing to the delegate math unless it actually changes the count significantly.
78  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET) on: March 26, 2016, 01:40:21 pm
Sanders needs to keep Clinton under viability in Washington in order to make a big dent in the delegate count.
79  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: BREAKING: Cheatin' Ted caught with FIVE mistresses! on: March 24, 2016, 11:08:28 pm
I don't believe this at all.
80  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Cruz will control Lousiana delegation despite TRUMP win on: March 24, 2016, 07:15:54 pm
This is going to do nothing but cause physical fights at the convention. Even if Cruz is able to secure the nomination through scheming, he will be very damaged going into the general.
81  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Opinions on a Scott Walker nomination at a contested convention on: March 24, 2016, 03:46:30 pm
The unions would mobilize against him heavily and he'd be defeated across the Midwest.
82  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls / Re: CA-PPIC: Trump +11, Clinton +7 on: March 24, 2016, 12:10:46 am
Sanders will most certainly win Humboldt and Mendocino, as well as the entire rural north and Gold Rush counties.
83  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections / Re: Alabama Gov. Bentley had affair with former staffer on: March 24, 2016, 12:02:21 am
He's termed out and it's not likely he would move up since Shelby and Sessions are not leaving any time soon. Not really a big deal.
84  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Whitehouse.gov receiving petition to redo Arizona vote. on: March 23, 2016, 06:50:05 pm
Are there people who actually think that there will actually be a redo? That would cost far too much money and time.
85  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Who would win a Sanders-Trump debate? on: March 22, 2016, 06:33:04 pm
It's not so much that Trump would win, it's just that he would force Sanders to play defense on tax increases. As we have seen in the primary, Trump has been able to damage his opponents in debates.
86  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders on topless protester: "I was trying very hard to get every detail" on: March 22, 2016, 05:24:48 pm
Let him be. At 74, thrills like this are few and far between for him.
87  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Bill Clinton criticizes the "awful legacy" of the last 8 years on: March 21, 2016, 11:29:49 pm
This is weak, really weak.
88  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders not running out of money: He's on track to raise 50-60 Mio. $ in March on: March 19, 2016, 05:04:53 pm
BTW, doesn't the fact that Sanders is soundly beaten almost everywhere by Clinton despite the fact that he outspends her kinda undermines his message about money in politics?

It really does.
89  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders not running out of money: He's on track to raise 50-60 Mio. $ in March on: March 19, 2016, 11:58:42 am
Every time he loses it seems like people just donate more to his campaign.
90  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Bernie Sanders be gracious in defeat? on: March 18, 2016, 08:11:43 pm
Sanders abruptly walked out of an interview when the reporter asked about his wife meeting with Joe Arpaio

You're making it sound like Jane Sanders and Joe Arpaio have political agreement, I'm just wondering if this deception is intentional or incidental?

Why did Sanders feel the need to abruptly leave an interview over such a simple question? That's my point.

Just to clarify, was your deception intentional or incidental?

What is your problem? I wasn't being deceptive, that your misinterpretation. I was wondering why Jane Sanders was meeting with Arpaio in the first place, but for Sanders to throw a diva fit about a mere question made me question it even more. Considering that Arpaio is a right-wing nut, it's fitting that there would be questions about the meeting. I never said anyone had an agreement.
91  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Bernie Sanders be gracious in defeat? on: March 18, 2016, 07:59:04 pm
Sanders abruptly walked out of an interview when the reporter asked about his wife meeting with Joe Arpaio

You're making it sound like Jane Sanders and Joe Arpaio have political agreement, I'm just wondering if this deception is intentional or incidental?

Why did Sanders feel the need to abruptly leave an interview over such a simple question? That's my point.
92  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Opinion of a Hillary Clinton/Meg Whitman ticket? on: March 18, 2016, 07:03:39 pm
Clinton would never put a Republican on her ticket. If there is anyone who actually loathes Republicans, it is Hillary Clinton.
93  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Hillary be indicted? on: March 18, 2016, 05:52:59 pm
It seems like another one of these threads pop up every time the delegate math improves for Clinton.
94  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: NYPD investigating Suspicious Letter threatening Eric Trump and his father on: March 18, 2016, 05:17:45 pm
The RNC isn't playing.
95  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Bernie Sanders be gracious in defeat? on: March 18, 2016, 10:40:35 am
Sanders abruptly walked out of an interview when the reporter asked about his wife meeting with Joe Arpaio
http://www.12news.com/mb/news/12-news-one-on-one-with-bernie-sanders/87672745
96  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls / Re: Rasmussen National: Trump domination on: March 18, 2016, 10:37:36 am
Kasich + Cruz > Trump does not = "Trump domination," which I might note are your words, rather than Rasmussen's, you naughty spin artist you. Alternatively, just why are lawyers so sucky when it comes to maths?

Cruz and Kasich can't pool votes in the primaries.
97  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Double Standards Employed on a massive scale on: March 17, 2016, 12:39:54 am
It's not like Hillary Clinton is out on the campaign trail making purposely divisive and racist comments, as well as calling for people being banned from entering the country or for a wall to be built on the border. Every campaign gets random endorsements that don't fit with said campaign.
98  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Bernie Sanders be gracious in defeat? on: March 16, 2016, 09:39:20 pm
After this issue of possibly attempting to flip pledged delegates, I'm not so sure he'll be all that gracious. If his campaign actually tries that strategy, it's pretty much unlikely that he'll even endorse Clinton after the primary.
99  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Can Sanders sweep the West? on: March 16, 2016, 04:40:07 pm
He'll win Washington, because it's a caucus and Oregon just because it's liberal. Clinton will carry California.
100  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Sanders' best county in Florida? on: March 15, 2016, 09:54:37 pm
Correct answer: Holmes County 52%

I called it.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 211


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines