Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 24, 2016, 08:00:04 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 224
76  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Your reaction if Trump loses Idaho on: August 02, 2016, 10:25:46 pm
He won't lose it, but Johnson will take a good share of the vote. Lots of Mormons live in Southeast Idaho and there is a libertarian streak in parts of the state.
77  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Trump caught eating fried chicken with a fork and knife! on: August 02, 2016, 05:51:22 pm
He probably threw it in the trash after the picture was taken.
78  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Trump: There's something phony about these polls on: August 02, 2016, 03:27:18 pm
It's never a sign of confidence for a candidate to criticize polls.
79  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: GA-SurveyUSA: Trump +4 on: August 02, 2016, 02:37:38 pm
I'd really be interested in seeing polling out of SC.

That's what I was thinking about too.
80  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: GA-SurveyUSA: Trump +4 on: August 01, 2016, 04:08:36 pm
Georgia will be extremely close this year.
81  General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: The eventual fate of Nina Turner on: August 01, 2016, 01:00:17 pm
She isn't going to be elected to office anymore. Even if OH-11 opened up she'd probably badly lose the Democratic primary.
82  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Not looking too good for Hillary in Ohio! on: August 01, 2016, 10:16:55 am
If there is one stupid argument that needs to be permanently retired, it is this one.
83  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Nina Turner: Green Party VP? on: July 31, 2016, 10:43:35 pm
Supposedly she was going to try and put her name into nomination for VP, so she was not allowed to take the stage. There was a push by some Sanders people to nominate her for VP. Bernie Sanders had to sit her down to avoid her making a scene.
84  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Nina Turner: Green Party VP? on: July 31, 2016, 10:27:49 pm
She could run for Governor in 2018, or be an liberal commentator or join a progressive activist group.

There is no chance she would even make it out of the primary. Commentating on obscure left-wing sites is probably what she will end up doing.
85  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Nina Turner: Green Party VP? on: July 31, 2016, 10:22:48 pm
Turner went from a Clinton supporter to a Sanders supporter, so I would be surprised if she ended up working with Stein. At this point there probably isn't even a connection between her and Sanders, because she claims that she was thrown out of the convention. That equals higher odds of her being Stein's VP choice.

Nah. Nina Turner wants a future. She endorsed Sanders for that reason.

Her future was gone when she lost badly in 2014 for Ohio Secretary of State.
86  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Johnson Says He Will Appoint Justices Like Breyer and Garland on: July 31, 2016, 09:37:14 pm
None of the four "major"/"main minor" candidates this year are pro-life. Trump is paying really cheap lip service. Clinton, Johnson and Stein are pro-choice.

So you can either vote for Trump or you can stay home.



That is a good point. I couldn't care less about the abortion issue as I'm not female and don't want children. But for those it matters, makes you wish Ron or Rand Paul was in there.

Also: I want Andrew Napolitano in there for Scalia's spot.  I want a strict Constitutionalist.

God, this is a terrible post.

Why would you not care about abortion because you aren't female and don't want kids? That's like saying you don't mind slavery because you aren't Black and don't own a farm.

Also, both Pauls are pro-life.

You should be ashamed.

It's the neo-libertarian way. Self-centered ideology.
87  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Robert Mugabe endorses Trump on: July 31, 2016, 01:15:20 pm
And they say black men don't like Trump.

Crazy black men tend to like people like Trump.
That seems borderline racist.

Not even remotely.
What you are basically saying is that any black man who doesn't vote the way enlightened white people like you who apparently think they know what is best for black America are mentally ill.

I'm not white.
88  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Robert Mugabe endorses Trump on: July 31, 2016, 12:52:32 pm
And they say black men don't like Trump.

Crazy black men tend to like people like Trump.
That seems borderline racist.

Not even remotely.
89  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Robert Mugabe endorses Trump on: July 31, 2016, 12:36:46 pm
And they say black men don't like Trump.

Crazy black men tend to like people like Trump.
90  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: MyAJC: Georgia Republicans scrambling to defend it for Trump on: July 30, 2016, 01:35:11 pm
I think there is a possibility that Georgia could flip. There are number of college educated whites in counties like Cobb and Gwinnett, which is a group of voters that Trump is not polling great with. There has also been an increase in Hispanic voter registration and while Hispanics don't make up a huge part of the electorate, the vote could factor in greatly in a close race.
91  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: That didn't take long... Trump leaks top-secret intel on: July 29, 2016, 11:38:14 pm
This sure looks like carelessness and recklessness. He should be in big trouble for this, but he'll get a pass because the government does not want to reprimand someone currently running for President, because the optics would look bad.
92  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Do you believe that Donald Trump is racist? on: July 29, 2016, 07:50:27 pm
He wanted to have a season of the Apprentice that was divided by race and there are numerous racist statements he made before that, like calling blacks lazy. There is also the fact that his company was sued for not renting to Blacks and Hispanics. He is definitely a racist.
93  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Clinton Campaign Hacked on: July 29, 2016, 07:03:04 pm
If there turns out to be a link between the RNC or Trump and the hacking, it would cause the GOP to totally collapse.

Not really. The partisanship (i.e, churlishness) of this electorate will not allow it.

This hack is being spun as an example of Hillary Clinton's incompetence at best, malfeasance at worst, on this very thread.

That would be a bridge too far for most of the real electorate. Some extreme partisans would spin it, but most people would be quite put off.
94  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Will Trump attend all 3 debates? on: July 29, 2016, 06:54:05 pm
It's hard to answer that question. With Trump, you really don't know what he will do.
95  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Clinton Campaign Hacked on: July 29, 2016, 06:48:35 pm
If there turns out to be a link between the RNC or Trump and the hacking, it would cause the GOP to totally collapse.
96  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Congressional Elections / Re: Cuyahoga County Black Lives Matter endorses Rob Portman on: July 29, 2016, 03:51:51 pm
If it's not an official chapter then this really doesn't amount to much.
97  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Would Trump refuse to concede? on: July 29, 2016, 11:15:43 am
Even if he doesn't, it makes no difference. People never understand that a concession is not required for an election to be certified. He won't concede no matter how much he loses by, because he's not sane enough to do it.
98  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: What's the Case for Hillary? on: July 29, 2016, 11:11:52 am
Sane and qualified.
99  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls / Re: MO-Mason-Dixon: Trump down 1 BEFORE the DNC on: July 29, 2016, 10:53:26 am
It's not out of the question that Clinton performs at 2008 Obama levels or even better. Trump is terrible.
100  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / 2016 U.S. Presidential Election / Re: Democratic National Convention days 3 and 4 **live commentary thread** on: July 28, 2016, 10:06:30 pm
All these blue avatars talking smack are just nervous lol.

Yes. These arguments are all over the place and grasping at every little straw.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 224


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines