|
51
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: should Ginsburg (and maybe Breyer) retire
|
on: October 05, 2011, 03:53:46 pm
|
Collins, Snowe, Graham and Lugar supported Kagan. Brown probably would have if he was in the Senate. Kirk might support a nominee.
That would be 6 and get them to 59 if all Dems stay together.
Brown was in the Senate. He voted against. Ah my bad. Thanks. Not sure he'd do the same this close to an election though. It would be a great way to help himself in his race by voting for a Dem nominee.
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: should Ginsburg (and maybe Breyer) retire
|
on: October 05, 2011, 03:36:33 pm
|
|
Collins, Snowe, Graham and Lugar supported Kagan. Brown probably would have if he was in the Senate. Kirk might support a nominee.
That would be 6 and get them to 59 if all Dems stay together.
Lamar Alexander supported Sotomayor, but not Kagan.
There may be those who would vote to break through a filibuster and not for the nominee. Alito only got 58 votes to confirm but 75 voted to stop a Dem filibuster.
Of course Thomas only got 52 votes.
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Why don't Democrats try and purify their party of moderates?
|
on: September 21, 2011, 04:55:40 pm
|
Talk of the Republican "purifying" is gross overstatement. In the great "purifying" year of 2010 only Republican congressional incumbents to lose primaries were Bob Inglis and Lisa Murkowski. One of them was a guy who went wobbly in one of the most conservative districts in the country and the other was borderline mentally retarded person appointed to Senate by her corrupt father. I guess I can be generous and count that last-minute party-switching whore Griffith. So that's three! 3! What a massacre!
Mike Castle wasn't an incumbent for the seat he was running for but he should be included in this. That was by far the most insane one.
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Congressional Elections / Re: NY-09, Special Election Thread
|
on: September 10, 2011, 10:54:16 pm
|
http://www.siena.edu/uploadedfiles/home/Parents_and_Community/Community_Page/SRI/SNY_Poll/CD90911%20Crosstabs.pdfmany Jews who say Israel is the main reason for there vote, are really saying marriage redefinition but it wasn't a listed choice (and other doesn't accomplish anything, but voting for your second reason does) (look at 90% of the Orthodox Jews who are voting for Turner based on Israel also say in the same statement the marriage but they are to afraid to mention it straight up) In addition the 6% of jews who say other I can almost guarantee that there biggest issue was marriage redefinition. I am very concerned for you and the level at which you seem to obsess over gays getting married. Perhaps you could use a vacation? He is gay. figures a person who thinks anyone who is against this sacrilege is a bigot would also automatically jump to this conclusion. If you want the reason here it is here's a quote from Jewish tradition (which I follow and believe so if you want to understand where I;) God did not decree (happened way before the flood but ) the flood until man started writing marriage documents to other men. notice there just was a hurricane in NY and my community had 3 deaths out of (I think) 4 deaths in the state. Now assuming Jewish tradition is a given, logically how can I come to any other conclusion but to fight it strongly. (What I wrote above is less then the cliff notes version of my position but it should suffice) are you trolling us?
|
|
|
|
|
|