Pingvin, the 'slippery slope' argument is more tired and overused than the 'current year' argument.
Besides, what does Pingvin mean by 'allow mentally ill to identify as non-humans'? Last time I checked, that's not currently prohibited, so why is he using that in the classic 'MUH SLIPPERY SLOPE' rant?
1) It's not a "slippery slope" if it's happening before our own eyes, when left is already trying to push the legalization of vile and disgusting degeneracy
, therefore it's not a hypothetical situation. Perverts, sadly, already have a platform for free speech
, so only we can prevent them from getting any kind of traction in politics and society.
2) To clarify my comments regarding "allowing mentally ill to identify as non-humans", I of course understood that some of them already do - what I meant is that idea of allowing "non-binary genders" on official documents (besides being ridiculous to any sane person) will create a precedent for removing any document marker that will stand in the way of some new, even more bizarre identity politics movement.