The Northeast and Mideast continue to pull their own legislative weight while the other three regions lag behind. Get stuff done, IDS!

[none]

I just realized that none of the non-Cuomo candidates have ever held elected office.

What did she do?

McGovern!

How about we all agree to vote for the guy who has the most popular votes, OK? Deal? Deal.

I don't think it is possible to dispute that Bacon King is best moderator.

I clicked on this and went "wut" and then I laughed loudly

BK wins

BK always wins.

I could care less about it.

Huh. I was thinking Eastman for President in 2056], but he would be old then, wouldn't he?

Yo, lefties, we need to reach a consensus on who to elect if and when this goes to the House. Browne's and Buchanan's votes will all probably go to Perot, so we've got to make a choice here. If we absolutely must compromise, I'd recommend going for Cuomo, as we can still have Nader in 2000, but not Cuomo. Thoughts?[/notsosecretleftistconspiracy]

Nader. Cuomo is unpopular, he was almost defeated in the primary, and you want him to remain in the office?

Birch Bayh was almost defeated in both of his primaries.

How about we all agree to vote for the guy who has the most popular votes, OK? Deal? Deal.

Yo, lefties, we need to reach a consensus on who to elect if and when this goes to the House. Browne's and Buchanan's votes will all probably go to Perot, so we've got to make a choice here. If we absolutely must compromise, I'd recommend going for Cuomo, as we can still have Nader in 2000, but not Cuomo. Thoughts?[/notsosecretleftistconspiracy]

This is going to be the closest election since 1912 if this keeps up.

[against]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

Perhaps the fact that people have been admitting to it?

Uh, who has been admitting to it? Show me proof.

Read the Republican run off thread.  Even if you guys were voting for not-Buchanan, it doesn't matter.

So...Buchanan was nominated fraudulently because Democrats voted against him? How does that work?

Well, there's two points.

1)  It could be a cover up

2)  Others who did not talk.

Not sure if serious or just trolling.

California!

[against]

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

Perhaps the fact that people have been admitting to it?

Uh, who has been admitting to it? Show me proof.

Read the Republican run off thread.  Even if you guys were voting for not-Buchanan, it doesn't matter.

So...Buchanan was nominated fraudulently because Democrats voted against him? How does that work?

A horrible, horrible person. Why does he want to repeal the 22nd amendment so badly?

Why not? And if you're going to say "well it makes Presidents dictatorial" then that's bullsh**t. If you have free, fair elections, like we did for over 150 years before the 22nd Amendment, then it's not a dictatorship. There'd be nothing stopping Americans voting out a President.

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

Perhaps the fact that people have been admitting to it?

Uh, who has been admitting to it? Show me proof.

15-15-15! No matter how this ends up, it needs to go to the House.

Perot will probably win there - the five other votes are for Buchanan and Browne.

All right then.

Vote Perot and protest election fraud.  The Republicans should be with us on this.

What election fraud?

Buchanan and Nader in the Reform slot.

But they both won.

By fraud....?  Even if you don't agree, you see what the implication I was going for was, yes?

I see the implication, yes; I was saying that they won in their own right. The only nominee who it could be argued was nominated fraudulently was Leonard Wood.

Now say that again with a straight face

Gladly. What evidence do you have that Buchanan and Nader were nominated fraudulently? Also, do you think all those Clinton votes in the 1992 and 1996 Democratic primaries were frauds or real?

[ARE YOU HUMAN?]

And this particular individual is indeed foul, pernicious and embarrassing, to say the least.

Yes, he is a human being, however, his actions betray that status.

Even the prosecuting attorney, clearly a legal authority, said to Gosnell during the trial

ARE YOU HUMAN?

A valid statement from the attorney indeed.   

There is no way you can gain or lose human "status". If you are a member of Homo sapiens sapiens, then you are and always will be a human.

McGovern!

Will this split in the left elect Perot? Stay tuned to find out!

Come on, left!

internet taxes

Hm. I'm torn between Nader and Cuomo, but seeing as Nader's in 2nd and Cuomo's in 3rd, I'm leaning towards calling the whole left to rally behind Nader/Sanders, if we must rally around one of them.