Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 95
|
|
4
|
General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Pick from four somewhat extreme countries
|
on: May 21, 2013, 03:31:49 pm
|
Hyperfeminismland ftw. But it would be nicer with male sex slaves, which would also help sustain population level.
I am not sure why you think a radical feminist matriarchy would have such a negative attitude towards heterosexual activity. If women controlled society 100% the male sexual exploitation they are against would disappear.
If women had "indentured male servants" why wouldn't they use them for sex?
That's a little scary. And more than we need to know about his her fetishes. Partly joking here and partly trying to be analytical. If you give one gender complete control sexual exploitation of the other gender is inevitable. All the countries are horrible, but if I should chose one I would prefer the option where my gender was in control. Its less freaky than my race having all the power. And the two other options are unacceptable to me. A police state and a plutocracy would both be too oppressive for a freedom loving person like me. So I am left with choosing between two versions where I get to be free, but others are oppressed.
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Do liberals understand that univseral healthcare is far too expensive?
|
on: May 21, 2013, 01:27:09 am
|
What we're doing now is far too expensive. We have the world's most expensive healthcare system, by far. All the universal healthcare countries get the job done far more cheaply.
This. Healthcare is an area where the market doesn't work well because you need insurance companies as middle men and that distorts the market mechanism. So in this particular case government allocation is actually cheaper.
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Polygamy the next big thing.
|
on: May 21, 2013, 01:10:21 am
|
|
I think its a no-go:
- It would be an even bigger break with Christian culture than gay marriage (which can be seen as just another version of the nuclear family).
- Feminists will fight polygamy, most of them support gay marriage.
- In Europe it would be seen as a kowtow to Islamists, this reaction would also exist in the rest of the Western world, but be a little weaker there.
- Polyandri would be too radical an idea for society - its a step towards matriarchy.
I think many interests would come together to fight it and that coalition would be stronger than the one against gay marriage.
EDIT: Gay marriage is in a way not that radical, because the gay partner can just take the same legal and social role as the straight partner in a traditional marriage. This would have far greater legal, economic and social consequences.
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Update Season VII: "The OK Corral"
|
on: May 20, 2013, 06:11:36 pm
|
I'm okay, folks! We had to take shelter, and the hail busted Grandma's back windshield. My car was spared. We took shelter at the church, which is underground, but no carport or covering.
Good to hear you and your loved ones are okay.
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
General Politics / Political Debate / Re: Pick from four somewhat extreme countries
|
on: May 20, 2013, 01:58:16 pm
|
|
Hyperfeminismland ftw. But it would be nicer with male sex slaves, which would also help sustain population level.
I am not sure why you think a radical feminist matriarchy would have such a negative attitude towards heterosexual activity. If women controlled society 100% the male sexual exploitation they are against would disappear.
If women had "indentured male servants" why wouldn't they use them for sex?
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Update Season VII: "The OK Corral"
|
on: May 20, 2013, 01:15:08 pm
|
US National Weather Service Norman Oklahoma A tornado watch will be issued soon for much of Oklahoma and parts of north Texas. Stay alert! We expect storms to start developing between now and 2pm
Nobody else here is from that area. Who is "we"? Pluralis majestatis. Yes, he has a habit of that. We, of the cognoscenti, however, avoid this behavior.  
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Update Season VII: "The OK Corral"
|
on: May 20, 2013, 12:57:09 pm
|
US National Weather Service Norman Oklahoma A tornado watch will be issued soon for much of Oklahoma and parts of north Texas. Stay alert! We expect storms to start developing between now and 2pm
Nobody else here is from that area. Who is "we"? Pluralis majestatis.
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Is any language as weird as German ?
|
on: May 20, 2013, 06:22:05 am
|
Icelandic language is weirdest language.
Why? Icelandic has a complex grammar, but less complex than, say, most Caucasian languages. But apart from that its a fairly "standard" Indo-European language. It has no real dialects, so it doesn't fit the description in the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Atlas members worse than holocaust deniers
|
on: May 20, 2013, 05:33:06 am
|
I guess the point is 1) Snowguy (and his ilk, like his useful idiot Torie) don't know what they are talking about when it comes to climate change, and they are as wrong and clueless as Palin was about, well - most everything, and 2) if we don't embrace the Green Revolution right this instant, and throw trillions at it, we are all going to die, or suffer grievously..
I know this is an old thread and you are being polemical here, but the idea that doing something about climate change is going to be extremely costly is plain wrong. Seen in a long term perspective the costs will be relatively limited. Not doing anything will be far more costly. The changes related to creating a sustainable economy will create business opportunities in new industries (and is already doing so) and avoid economic loss related to loss of agricultural land, flooding, desert spread etc. in the future. Its economically prudent and vital for long term growth to do something about climate change. The whole "this is just doomsday preaching" line is tiresome. Climate change will increase the over all conflict level in the world and make living conditions worse for large parts of the world, but we are obviously not all going to die. This demonising of concern for climate change as alarmist and Armageddon prophecies is plain wrong. We are talking about a rational estimation of a problem and its potentially very serious consequences, not doomsday preaching.
|
|
|
|
|
|