Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 24
|
|
4
|
Forum Community / Off-topic Board / Re: "The Office" ends tomorrow.
|
on: May 17, 2013, 11:06:31 pm
|
The episode was a good episode, and the best of the season (but that's not saying much). I'm sad it's over, but this season was pretty bad.
I did not cry in this one, although the episode where Michael leaves still gets me teary eyed when I watch it. It was a great show, and one that I'll always love. Definitely the end of an era last night and a big loss for NBC, in my opinion.
Season 9 was as good as the first 7 it's season 8 that totally stopped the shows roll.
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion / Election What-ifs? / Re: 2012: Barack Obama vs. Abraham Lincoln
|
on: May 17, 2013, 08:39:38 am
|
Lincoln running would be unconstitutional...
Well since his first two terms were before the 22nd was passed and he is Abe Lincoln, maybe the Supreme Court can make an exception for him... Don't think so, the supreme court is there to uphold the constitution not bend the rules for people, if someone had been born ten years before the 22nd amendment was passed should they be allowed to run for more than 2 terms? No...
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Forum Community / Off-topic Board / Re: "The Office" ends tomorrow.
|
on: May 16, 2013, 08:03:46 am
|
|
I've seen every episode multiple times, after season 8 I seriously considered quitting the show but stuck it through and it was so worth it, season nine has been really good back to Michael Scott level of humour...
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: Conservative plans march on Washington with loaded rifles
|
on: May 11, 2013, 10:16:45 am
|
Oh jee wiz the constitution is flawed then.
It was designed that way for a reason. It is there to prevent a police state. Those who were responsible for the Constitution and Bill of Rights noted the previous failure of republics. These amendments were meant to protect the people from losing the republic. They believed guns were just as important as the US Constitution itself, in terms of protecting liberty. baha, you and mozambique are like the only countries that recognise guns at all. do you see australians as trapped in a police state? Yeah when it was written hundreds of years ago maybe there was a risk, but it's 2013 man get with the times.
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: SC Dem Chair makes Bigoted Comment about Nikki Haley
|
on: May 11, 2013, 09:16:12 am
|
Dick Harpootlian is a creep and saying you will send a dark-skinned person "back to wherever the hell [they] came from" is loaded with subtext - subtext which, ironically, your party usually refuses to admit exists (because discrimination today only exists when it's directed at Christians or at white men).
Still not as bad as when a Republican state senator threw subtext out the window and just called Ms. Haley a "raghead" on a talk radio show.
I never refused to admit it exists. I just refuse to believe that every little thing that people say has bigoted subtexts. If Dick Harpootlian were a Republican, you guys would be all over this and accusing him of using racist dog whistles. Yes, I would be accusing a Republican Harpootlian of using racist dog whistles, for the same reason I'm already accusing a Democratic Harpootlian of using racist dog whistles -- because he is. Perhaps Mr. Harpootlian needs to go back to wherever the hell he came from (Armenia, in his case). If we're sending him back there, can we send the Kardashians back too? Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|