Journal apologies & retracts paper on Transracialism after social media backlash (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 05:50:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Journal apologies & retracts paper on Transracialism after social media backlash (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Journal apologies & retracts paper on Transracialism after social media backlash  (Read 2173 times)
Famous Mortimer
WillipsBrighton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
United States


« on: May 02, 2017, 02:32:51 PM »

Transracialism will never become accepted because the left hates it. That's what this whole article is about. She got blacklisted by online leftists so the article was withdrawn.
Logged
Famous Mortimer
WillipsBrighton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2017, 05:42:50 PM »

"Transracialism" is stupid as hell, but I have to say that parts of the various responses are very cringeworthy as well...

"She uses the term “transgenderism.” She talks about “biological sex” and uses phrases like “male genitalia.”"

So what? Are those terms banned or something?

Yes. They are considered very transphobic in most left spaces on the internet. I guess it hasn't reached the normie liberal places you hang out yet. Give it another 6 months.

Biological sex is now considered a social construct with no basis in science and "male genitalia" is now the genitalia of a male identifying person, whether it's a penis or a vagina. Saying that a penis is inherently male is considered transphobic.
Logged
Famous Mortimer
WillipsBrighton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2017, 01:34:57 PM »

The left opposes "trans-racialism" because it makes transgenderism look stupid. That's the only reason. Any other explaination for why trans-racialism is bad in an obvious post hoc argument designed to justify the conclusion they already wanted.

Why is racial social construction different from gender social construction? The left's answer is because "they're different". How are they different? "Because they are". Their rejection of trans-racialism relies completely on this unsupported assertion.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.