Okay, before we have a s**tfest here just keep in mind three things:
1. It is not known whether these two teens are Muslims or of Muslim heritage.
2. Out of recent acid attacks in Britain, Muslims were among the victims as well.
3. While there is a troubling... more like dramatic rise in these attacks, it's neither a new nor foreign phenomenon in Britain. Such monstrosities dates back to the Victorian times.
"Terrorism" is a matter of definition. Usually we're referring to ideologically motivated violence/large-scale attacks, but Sanchez made a good point here.
1. It's possible they aren't but it's extremely likely they are. If someone shot up a BLM rally, you wouldn't object to people making the reasonable assumption that it was probably a White guy, even though there would be a small chance it wasn't in that case too.
2. Yes, Muslims were victims of violence by other Muslims.
3. You're saying we shouldn't address the fact that Muslim immigration is the cause of the increase because attacks occasionally happened in the past. That's like saying if a model of car is prone to randomly explode, there shouldn't be a recall because cars have caught on fire before in the past.
I'm sure you'll go ahead and delete this comment though.
You should not be the moderator of a politics forum if you believe that the most important issue of the era (third world immigration) should never be discussed critically.
