>citing conservative sources crying liberal bias
Math is not a vast left-wing conspiracy.
The lower article employed actual information. Not skewed to my knowledge. You skew the reality of it to show it skewing reality. I love circular logic.
And how has Nate Silver ever been a conservative darling for calling something genuinely off-putting out. If he called out Rassy or that article defamed Rassy, you would love it. Rassy sucks, too, by the way.
Ah, gotcha. You're partially right - New Republic is actually liberal - sometimes I get that confused with freep, so that might have some problems. The Washington Examiner is actually a conservative source - I've read the firsthand source from Nate Silver and it was more concerned with them using "feelings" on whether to release the poll or not. However, the fact that he still includes them in his average, and even
Erick Erickson of all people defended PPP should show that PPP's generally more well-respected than Rasmussen.
