Gay Marriage comes to Indiana?

[CountryClassSF]

Sounds like the Democrat-lite GOP sold us down the river again. Surprise surprise. Just let the people vote. If people are "evolving," what do social liberals have to worry about?

[CountryClassSF]

Sounds like the Democrat-lite GOP sold us down the river again. Surprise surprise. Just let the people vote. If people are "evolving," what do social liberals have to worry about?

Constitutional rights > public opinion. Again.

Where does the constitution say two men and two women can get hitched? Is it near that provision that the founding fathers put in that allows for abortion on demand?

Or is it a constitutional right because it's something you desire/want?

[CountryClassSF]

Sounds like the Democrat-lite GOP sold us down the river again. Surprise surprise. Just let the people vote. If people are "evolving," what do social liberals have to worry about?

Constitutional rights > public opinion. Again.

Where does the constitution say two men and two women can get hitched? Is it near that provision that the founding fathers put in that allows for abortion on demand?

Or is it a constitutional right because it's something you desire/want?

Nowhere. The constitution doesn't grant a right to marriage. Nothing in the constitution compels any state to grant marriage benefits to anyone. But the 14th amendment's equal protection clause indicates that IF the state is going to grant recognition and benefits to the union of one couple, THEN they should have to grant it to the union of all couples without discriminating. 

Okay, so this includes polygamists and family members that are related to eachother?

[CountryClassSF]

I wasn't aware characteristics were civil rights.

Why is it so important to you that the homosexualist agenda is is shoved in our faces?

[CountryClassSF]

Why should I be denied the right to visiting rights for my spouse while a heterosexual can do that? Surely you don't believe homosexuality is a choice considering the fact that you are one and haven't been able to cleanse yourself of this awful disease.

This is either an extremely delusional person or a troll.

Despite this leftist-esque rudeness, I'm happy to let you know:

A) No human being would *ever* deny you the ability to see your loved one in the hospital.
B) Arrangements do not require marriage to be redefined.
C) Contractual arrangements can be made.
D) Just because I disagree with your worldview, doesn't make me a troll.
E) Label me all you want - everyone is different, everyone has different ideas.

[CountryClassSF]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Not sure how a ballot initiative with one side blaring the horns of confidence of inevitability of same-sex 'marriage' is shoving an agenda into your face.

You have forced this new definition of marriage on us, that's just the bottom line. That's the real reason for all of this is for Christians to feel upset. That's my opinion as to why this is happening.

[CountryClassSF]

Lib judge overrules bible. Sad. Time for a federal marriage amendment.