Best vice president for Clinton out of these picks (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 05:46:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Best vice president for Clinton out of these picks (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: -skip-
#1
Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA)
 
#2
Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ)
 
#3
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
 
#4
Sec. Julian Castro (D-TX)
 
#5
Sen. Al Franken (D-MN)
 
#6
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA)
 
#7
Gov. Deval Patrick (D-MA)
 
#8
Sec. Tom Perez (D-MD)
 
#9
Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-VT)
 
#10
Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA)
 
#11
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 84

Author Topic: Best vice president for Clinton out of these picks  (Read 1150 times)
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« on: May 12, 2016, 03:55:22 AM »

Best: Becerra, Perez, Warren, Booker

Worst: Castro, Brown, Patrick, Warner


Also I seriously don't get the hype for Kaine. It's get why people believe Clinton could pick him, but the man is incredibly bland.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2016, 04:08:27 AM »
« Edited: May 12, 2016, 04:14:09 AM by publicunofficial »

I don't know why people say Becerra. He's never held statewide office, probably not too well-known. A two-woman ticket is too risky, Bernie Sanders is really up and age and may not be in good physical shape to be VP for 4 (let alone Cool years, and some (like Warren, Booker, and Brown) would cost Democrats a Senate seat. I'm guessing she'll pick Kaine, who would be her best bet.

I've never considered being well-known to be a very important qualifier for VP. Anyone picked to be VP becomes a household name within the week anyway, and it's not like a lot of Americans know who Tim Kaine or Sherrod Brown are outside of voters in their home states and heavily politically-aware people (who by and large already know who they're voting for).

Also I seriously don't get the hype for Kaine. It's get why people believe Clinton could pick him, but the man is incredibly bland.
He's ideologically compatible, has executive/legislative experience, chaired the DNC, speaks Spanish and won two statewide elections in a purple state. He basically checks the most boxes. In an election against Trump, especially against an extremely abrasive ticket like Trump/Christie or Trump/Gingrich, bland is sort of a good thing. He has the right resume to round out a "steady hands" ticket, which conventional wisdom says is her best defense against Trump.

Fair enough. But personally I believe Clinton's biggest obstacle won't be attracting independents, but voter enthusiasm. Elizabeth Warren inspires more enthusiasm among Democrats than almost any politician I've seen (I honestly believe that Warren could win a one-on-one primary with Clinton), and unlike Bernie she hasn't spent the last half a year locked in an passive-aggressive battle with Hillary.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.