Why was Connecticut so (relatively) Democratic during the Gilded Age? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 02:47:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was Connecticut so (relatively) Democratic during the Gilded Age? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Connecticut so (relatively) Democratic during the Gilded Age?  (Read 1081 times)
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,583
Bhutan


« on: September 14, 2013, 12:51:33 PM »

Why was Connecticut so Democratic (for New England) during the the late 1800s?

The rest of New England voted Republican in every election from 1856 through 1908, but the Democratic candidate carried the nutmeg state in four of those elections (Tilden once, Cleveland three times).  Also, the margins of victory were usually less than five points, while in neighboring Massachusetts and Rhode Island, they was usually more than 10.

Did Connecticut have more influence from NYC?  Were the Irish influential earlier than in the rest of New England?  What was the reason?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 11 queries.