Does NH deserve its first-in-the-nation place in presidential primary season? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 10:56:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Does NH deserve its first-in-the-nation place in presidential primary season? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Does NH deserve its first-in-the-nation place in presidential primary season?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: Does NH deserve its first-in-the-nation place in presidential primary season?  (Read 2635 times)
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,649
Bhutan


« on: March 21, 2015, 11:18:48 AM »

They don't really deserve it but then no one else does either.

This.

There should not be a nationwide primary, there should just be a few states doing it at a time.  Since no state deserves to be first all the time, the order in which states hold contests should be randomly selected through a lottery each cycle.  One state can be randomly selected for the first primary, then two for the second time, and three for the third round.  After that, the number should not exceed five.

A nationwide presidential primary would be problematic in a field of multiple candidates, and holding a few contests at a time can help eliminate candidates aren't fit for the long haul.  But no state should be entitled the special position of first all the time (and I say this as someone originally from Iowa).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.