Washington state megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 01:49:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Washington state megathread (search mode)
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12
Author Topic: Washington state megathread  (Read 864582 times)
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #200 on: August 04, 2017, 10:50:54 AM »

Sara Nelson has conceded in the City Council race. It's Grant vs. Mosqueda.

I'm surprised Sara Nelson did as well as she did, though horrible "neighborhood" candidates sometimes overperform

The Times endorsement counts for something. But Nelson never got the full establishment endorsement that Durkan got; Pramila Jayapal, most of the council, and most local Democratic groups endorsed Mosqueda.

Jon Grant heavily considered dropping out when Mosqueda entered the race; even he doesn't see a lot of differences between their campaigns (I've found them to be disagreeing on maybe 3-4 issues).

They disagree on housing, which is the important one to me. But yes, Mosqueda is not super different from Grant on a host of other issues. She'll make a great Councilwoman - I just hope her and Gonzalez come
Around on the SoDo Stadium


I agree with this prediction. I think most of Harris' support goes to Dhingra.

And Englund is a much better fit here than Trump, an area with a lot of Romney-Clinton voters, especially downballot. (Though I believe Obama carried the 45th?)
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #201 on: August 04, 2017, 09:48:37 PM »

Oh, Obama carried the 45th handily. 57.9-39.44

Just want to get on the record: Sara Nelson is not a "neighborhood" candidate. Pat Murakami (also endorsed by the Seattle Times) is the quintessential such candidate. I get why angrygreatness doesn't like her, but she isn't a NIMBY. In fact her overall political ideology probably suits you, KS, more than Mosqueda's. Nelson started the City Builders FB group, one of the first such groups dedicated to urbanism and growing Seattle up. Just because the Seattle Times chose her and decided to focus on some quote about neighborhoods needing to be heard, doesn't make her one. In fact every candidate has said something along the lines of "we need to still talk to the neighborhoods". It's just not politically feasible to not do so.

The Urbanist's Q&A: https://www.theurbanist.org/2017/06/28/2017-endorsement-questionnaire-sara-nelson/

My support for Mosqueda flows more from not wanting Grant anywhere near office than anything she's done in particular. Maybe I should do more research, though Tongue

(I have to be realistic with who can win in Seattle these days. Warmed-over neoliberal hacks like me are not ascendant politically there haha)
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #202 on: August 06, 2017, 12:36:58 PM »

^ So, "Commies" are the one, who win the elections in Seattle now?Huh)))

Not Commies, but Sawant and her merry band are VERY far left
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #203 on: August 10, 2017, 03:51:51 PM »


No, but she's not an economically illiterate, virtue-signaling NiMBY-empowering spoken word artist with zero political experience in bed with Sawant (unlike Nikita Oliver)
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #204 on: August 10, 2017, 09:06:31 PM »


Durkan is the moderate candidate in the race. I would hope you actually look at their positions instead of just immediately supporting whoever you decide is more moderate, though.


No, but she's not an economically illiterate, virtue-signaling NiMBY-empowering spoken word artist with zero political experience in bed with Sawant (unlike Nikita Oliver)

She's out of the race, you don't have to keep poo-poo'ing her, KS.



Aren't there ballot challenges to sort through?
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #205 on: August 10, 2017, 09:17:20 PM »

Kingpoleon:

A good way to understand Seattle politics is to accept that everyone is REALLY progressive/left-wing and then judge them on the issues. Durkan may be to Moon's left on certain things, and to her right on others. It really boils down to the best portfolio of views. That's why even though hes way to my left I've always respected Mike McGinn (aka Mike McSchwinn) because he was a staunch urbanist, supported the SoDo Arena (unlike Ed Murray) and history proved him right on the waterfront tunnel with the Bertha fiasco. It's too bad he was an abrasive weirdo, because he's so superior to Murray on urban issues, IMO, even though Murray is probably the more "moderate"
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #206 on: August 11, 2017, 08:50:28 AM »

^ Is it not too boring when everyone and his/her grandfather is commited to (essentially) the same ideology? It doesn't matter whether it's far left or (as in some areas) - far right. Without diversity of ideologies politics becomes senseless, IMHO... It's like as it was in Russia under Soviet rule, when all, that existed, was "united block of Communists and non-party members" (under strong Communist dominance, of course).....

No, actually, Seattle politics are a fascinating, of sometimes depressing, showdown between the worst tendencies of both ur-progressivism and milquetoast technocratic liberalism. I'm surprised we got two candidates with such good potential as Durkan and Moon
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #207 on: August 11, 2017, 03:18:55 PM »

I mean it's only boring if you don't find local, Seattle-related issues interesting...
And even then, there are many varying views that don't fit on Seattle's Left - Far Left spectrum at all.

You've got the issues: housing affordability, homelessness, transit/traffic, and inequality/inequity that don't impact non-Seattleites, but then there isn't some delineated line broken down by ideology, which makes it fascinating to watch. There are Socialist urbanists, who are pro-housing and pro-development, rich single-family home owning establishment/business Ds that want to "preserve" their neighborhoods, and renting, low-income minorities that oppose development due to the threat of displacement, among many other, non conforming Lefty groups.

There's a lot more nuance to local politics than there is to national politics.

Well said!
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #208 on: August 16, 2017, 05:18:22 PM »

Oliver concedes:

http://www.thestranger.com/slog/2017/08/15/25350082/nikkita-oliver-concedes-mayoral-race-will-not-endorse-cary-moon-or-jenny-durkan

Frankly, I thought her concession statement had the feeling of sour grapes, especially since she had previously pledged to support Moon (and vice versa). My distaste for Oliver has been well documented here, though, so that may be my bias coloring it. Still, as someone who could have a crack at Harrell in the future, I'm surprised she worded things so strongly as I imagine neither Durkan nor Moon will be a prototypical ally of Harrell the Hack

Race IMO is Lean Durkan. It'll be interesting to see how many Oliver/Hasegawa/McGinn voters Moon can consolidate, i anticipate her and Durkan splitting Farrell's supporters evenly
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #209 on: August 25, 2017, 11:47:20 AM »

Out of curiosity - does anyone know who draws City Council districts post-2020? IIRC the current lines were imposed by the initiative backers
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #210 on: September 05, 2017, 03:07:40 PM »

Out of curiosity - does anyone know who draws City Council districts post-2020? IIRC the current lines were imposed by the initiative backers

"Every ten years, the district boundaries would be re-designated by a five-member Districting Commission composed of two members appointed by the Mayor, two by a two-thirds vote of the City Council, and the fifth appointed by the first four.  The first Commission must be appointed by October 31, 2022.  The Districting Commission must appoint a master who must draw a districting plan.  The population of the largest district cannot exceed the population of the smallest district by more than one percent.  To the extent possible, natural boundaries must be taken into account.  The Districting Commission must then develop, and approve by majority vote, a districting proposal.  After public comment, the Commission must approve a final districting plan, which must be filed with the City Clerk.  Upon filing with the City Clerk, the districting plan will become final."

Interesting that city council has no say. I'm curious if anyone has gamed out what the districts may look like - some neighborhoods are definitely growing faster than others.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #211 on: September 06, 2017, 02:08:25 PM »

Districts 7 (downtown, Queen Anne, and Magnolia) and 3 (Capitol Hill, First Hill, Central Area) will shrink, particularly 7. My guess is Magnolia goes to 6 (Ballard and Northwest Seattle), although 6 will likely shrink a bit.

5 (North Seattle) will have to grow the most, followed by 1 (West Seattle), 4 (Northeast Seattle, U District, Wallingford), and 2 (South Seattle). The latter two probably only grow a bit, but that's challenging for 1 as its borders are perfectly aligned with the Duwamish. It'll likely have to take all of SoDo and creep up into Pioneer Square. 2 is easy, it'll eat 3's area south of I90.
Link to map:http://www.kingcounty.gov/depts/elections/elections/~/media/depts/elections/elections/maps/seattle-city-council-maps/seattle-city-council-districts.ashx

Yeah the map definitely won't be as clean.

In light of the Reichert news, I'm curious if some bigger names take a run at the 8th and if that opens the door for current candidates to drop down into the Leg races

Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #212 on: September 06, 2017, 05:09:52 PM »

I wonder if Issaquah city councilor Tola Marts drops down to run in LD-5 if Mallet runs. Or perhaps he'd challenge Rodne or Graves anyway.

No one's mentioned her in the other thread, but popular LD-47 rep Pat Sullivan could make a run for it.
I'm really surprised that moderate (& young) Joe Fain isn't taking a stab at it. Maybe he thinks he wouldn't make it to the top two.

I think Fain wants Mark Schoesler's job, at least that's my suspicion. Especially now that he's the last Bold Moderate Eastside RepublicanTM that's left.

Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #213 on: September 07, 2017, 08:51:37 AM »

I wonder if Issaquah city councilor Tola Marts drops down to run in LD-5 if Mallet runs. Or perhaps he'd challenge Rodne or Graves anyway.

No one's mentioned her in the other thread, but popular LD-47 rep Pat Sullivan could make a run for it.
I'm really surprised that moderate (& young) Joe Fain isn't taking a stab at it. Maybe he thinks he wouldn't make it to the top two.

I think Fain wants Mark Schoesler's job, at least that's my suspicion. Especially now that he's the last Bold Moderate Eastside RepublicanTM that's left.



No one else left? Even in Bellevue, Redmond and Mercer Island councils?Huh

Rossi - filling in during vacancies
Rodney Tom - switched parties (twice), retired when Habib lined him up
Steve Litzow - defeated
Andy Hill - died, sadly
Kathy Lambert - likely the last Republican for a long time who will hold her current council seat
Reagan Dunn - his last statewide foray didn't go well. Would probably lose WA-8
Rob McKenna - the golden boy, likely done with elective politics for the foreseeable future

Am I missing anyone? 16 years ago this was a deep future bench for the WAGOP. Last year they had to draft total rando Bill Bryant just to have a warm body against Jay Inslee. All three Dem front runners in '20 are MUCH more exciting and engaging politicians than Inslee.

The old backbone of the WAGOP is gone.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #214 on: September 07, 2017, 11:32:30 AM »

^ I know all those persons)) That's why i asked about members of city councils, which i couldn't know. Like John Chelminiak (Bellevue)...

Bellevue's city council was conservative majority as recently as a few years ago, but I believe it has flipped. Redmond, Mercer Island and Kirkland are all pretty standard suburban Dem
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #215 on: September 12, 2017, 04:26:42 PM »

Breaking: Murray Out Tomorrow

http://www.thestranger.com/slog/2017/09/12/25408886/seattle-mayor-ed-murray-will-resign-after-cousin-accuses-him-of-sexual-abuse
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #216 on: September 26, 2017, 02:19:03 PM »

Per DKE there's apparently a poll out there somewhere with Dhingra up 55-41. Specials can be hard to poll but I think that will be close to the final margin, personally. Figure a lot of those undecideds break D. And once Dhingra is seated (presuming a massive upset doesn't occur) then the Senate GOP's witch hunt against Sound Transit can end.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #217 on: September 27, 2017, 10:55:36 AM »

Englund campaign is getting hilariously  desperate. Now blaming Dhingra for Amazon seeking their secondary HQ and claiming that she wants to help Kshama Sawant and Ed Murray "impose Seattle values on the Eastside." Heroin injection sites and "cash grabs!" were bandied around too.

Pro tip, GOP: it's not the 1980s anymore
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #218 on: September 27, 2017, 03:17:53 PM »

I saw this on DailyKos:

Olympia City Council Seat 6 Aug. 1st Election Results

Jeannine Roe (R-inc) — 45.57% (4237)

Renata Rollins (G) — 37.02% (3,442)

Michael Snodgrass (D) — 17.4% (1618)

Greens and Democrats have teamed up to fund and support Renata Rollins (G) in the runoff on Nov. 7th to take this Olympia, WA (pop. 51.2k) city council seat. This is a way to push Jill Stein out of our minds and realize that Greens and Dems can work together against Republicans when necessary. Jeannine Roe is a confirmed Republican City Councilor.

This is a seat that we as a coalition can definitely win, and the Green Party would actually have a chance to grow. Greens, when they don’t cause ballot splitting catastrophes, should most certainly be given the chance to govern. Cam Gordon (G) is a city councilor on the Minneapolis City Council, the largest city council with a Green Party officeholder currently.

Could happen. Olympia is a pretty progressive town (see: Evergreens State, which had a rep as hippyland even a decade ago)
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #219 on: September 30, 2017, 02:55:13 PM »

Bgwah in another forum pointed out that Washington state OFM released their 2017 population estimates for smaller entities, like legislative districts!

And so now we have a picture of how Seattle's explosive growth will shape redistricting come 2020.
Based on a population of 7,310,300, each district should have 149,190 people.

Districts by numeric and percent growth between 2010-2017:

1. 43rd (Capitol Hill, First Hill, Central Area, U District),     173,641, 36,389, 26.51%
2. 36th (South Lake Union, Belltown, Queen Anne, Ballard),  167,352, 30,105, 21.94%

3. 1st (Bothell, Juanita, unincorporated Snoho),                   159,308, 22,072, 16.08%
4. 37th (Pioneer Square, South Seattle, Skyway),            157,001, 19,809, 14.44%
5. 21st (Edmonds, Mukilteo, Mill Creek),                             155,896, 18,636, 13.58%
6. 18th (Exurban Clark County),                                         154,432, 17,215, 12.55%
7. 9th (Pullman, rural counties, West Pasco),                       153,937, 16,714, 12.18%
8. 44th (Lake Stevens, Snohomish, Mill Creek),                   153,400, 16,154, 11.77%
9. 5th (North Bend, Sammamish, Issaquah),                       153,230, 16,020, 11.68%
10. 2nd (Rural Pierce Co, Lacey, Yelm),                               152,987, 15,785, 11.51%
11. 22nd (Olympia, Lacey),                                                152,822, 15,583, 11.36%
12. 8th (Richland, Kennewick),                                           152,477, 15,275, 11.13%
13. 31st (Exurban and rural King/Pierce)                             152,397, 15,183, 11.07%
14. 17th (East Vancouver, Battleground),                            152,203, 14,973, 10.91%
15. 48th (Redmond, Kirkland, Bellevue),                             151,660, 14,434, 10.52%
16. 34th (West Seattle, Burien, Vashon Island)                151,238, 14,030, 10.23%
....
22. 46th (NE Seattle, Northgate, Shoreline, Kenmore)      149,079, 11,826, 8.62%

This is awesome! Do you know where the original data/projections was posted by bgwah?

Those raw numbers in the fastest growing districts are nuts. Crazy to think I live in the 3rd fastest growing one (LD1. North Bothell is growing like gangbusters). The lines in Jing County will be really different in the 2020s
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #220 on: September 30, 2017, 06:19:34 PM »

Here you go: http://ofm.wa.gov/pop/smallarea/default.asp

Im surprised to see some far flung suburbs and exurbs growing quickly too. Looks like tract housing is all the rage again in suburban Snohomish county. Boo.

I believe both Lynnwood and Everett have long term plans for downtown density (color me skeptical), but other than that yeah it's pretty sprawl-y.

It's crazy that some of those Seattle districts are 15-20k overpopulated. Those people will have to go somewhere. The new maps should definitely advantage Democrats more than the current ones, especially if there's 27 districts growing more slowly than a relatively median district like the 46th. Lot of places that will need to take on more land.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #221 on: September 30, 2017, 07:18:52 PM »

Definitely. Seattle has enough people for 4.78 districts and will probably be just below 5 for the census.
There will be at least 6 districts based in Seattle, and likely a 7th taking a small 20-30k remainder (like the 11th and 32nd currently do).

I think the casualty district will come from the Olympic Peninsula/Coast/SW Washington.
The 19th (Gray's Harbor, Pacific, and Longview) was the slowest growing +1.19%, while the 24th (Olympic Peninsula) and 35th (Mason County) were bottom 10. Also the 20th grew pretty slowly (Lewis/Clark/Thurston counties).

Yup. Those districts are probably eventually gone for Dems anyhow
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #222 on: October 03, 2017, 10:13:43 PM »

I think Dems could hold a district that was a combo of the current 24th and 35th, coming from someone who lives here.

Alternatively just fold the 19th into the 20th, since the trend there seems terminal.

Figuring out a way to draw Tim Sheldon out of a district would be a great start, at least
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #223 on: October 18, 2017, 09:06:38 AM »

If I had to guess, Durkan wins... narrowly. Durkan would be an improvement over Murray of course but I’d like to see Moon take it. I think she “gets it” on the issues like McGinn did but isn’t an abrasive, sharp-elbowed wierdo who doesn’t play well with others.

Lol at the Times endorsing Grant. SFH Uber Alles for the Blethen Family Newsletter, nothing new under the sun. That article where the Stranger tried to figure out what on earth was going on was hilarious.

Anyways, here’s hoping Mosqueda wins.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #224 on: October 18, 2017, 02:34:31 PM »

I think Mosqueda has it in the bag.
She'll get the vast majority of Nelson voters.

I hope Moon wins, but I think it'll be difficult. It would be nice to get some polling.

It would.

Also. The 45th. I think Dhingra wins, probably about 54-46 or so. Her ads focus (smartly) on education and run on Hulu (which I’ve never seen before). I’ve never seen an Englund ad anywhere but CNBC and it’s the usual dire “hurrrr income tax! Injection sites!” stuff you’d have expected. The positive, sunny stuff the JLE campaign ran in the summer is long gone.

Sadly I moved out of the 45th in June otherwise Dhingra would my vote and my wife’s. We’re 13 blocks from the district line now. Oh well!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 12 queries.