Its wrong, and possibly illegal under McCain-Feingold.
Is there ANYTHING that actually is illegal under McCain-Feingold.?
I will point out that the group has invited Kerry to participate in a panel discussion after the broadcast. That seems to comply with the legal requirements.
I voted yes, largely because I feel that the owner has a right to express their opionn. If it were on in Phila, would I watch it? It frankly would depend what else was on the other chanels.
The issue of Kerry's service and Bush's service doesn't tell will do as president.
So basically you would be ok with it if CBS decided to air Fahrenheit 911 on Nov 1st if they invited Bush to participate in a panel discussion afterwards?
Pretty much. Moore is talking about offering it PPV. I'll keep my $9.95.
We live in something called a "free country." I may strongly disagree with the content of the film, and might object to either presentation on other grounds (language), but if Moore wishes to potentially lose a lot of profit, and CBS a lot of advertising revenue, they are free to do it. I won't be watching it.
I feel the same way about the Sinclair Group. Bush will get my vote, but that doesn't mean the Sinclair group will get my revenue.
That's one of the reasons you have not heard me criticize the 527 groups. If I want to spend my money to say, accurately, that "John Kerry admitted to commited atrocities in Vietnam and comes from a family with a history of drug dealing," I have that right.
I'll add that both statements
are technically accurate, but
are distorted to sound much worse that what they are in their real context.
I don't think that this statement is relevant to Kerry's ability, or lack thereof, to govern. I feel the same way about the TX Air National Guard claims by critics of Bush.