Why are the Dem. candidates younger than the Rep. ones? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 03:33:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why are the Dem. candidates younger than the Rep. ones? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why are the Dem. candidates younger than the Rep. ones?  (Read 1333 times)
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,700


« on: January 02, 2014, 04:37:57 PM »

Since the end of the WWII, only in 1948, 1964, 1968 and in 2004 the Democratic candidate was older than the Republican candidate. What causes the preference of one party for young candidates and the preference of the other party for old candidates?

"Most of the young people is Democratic and most of the old people is Republican" might not be an answer because both parties have young and old politicians. Joe Biden is old, Sarah Palin and Paul Ryan are young.

Logged
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,700


« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2014, 03:17:24 PM »

It's interesting. There's several reasons.

This was a period in which Republicans dominated the White House so there were less opportunities for Democrats to use roles in presidential cabinets as a platform to run for President.

Democrats developed a tendency to go for new faces like JFK, McGovern, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. That skews young. It also led to Gore being fairly young when he was a two-term Veep.

Republicans developed a liking for politicians who were outside politics before running for higher office. This meant they had to be accomplished and it takes a while for that to happen. Eisenhower was in his 60s during his first bid for office. Ronald Reagan became Governor at 55. George HW Bush became Congressman at a relative young 43, but it took him a while to build a sufficient resume to run for Prez in 1980 (which led to him getting the nomination in 1988.) George W Bush became Governor at 48. Mitt Romney became Governor at 54.

A very significant factor I just realized is that Democrats have a strong tendency to pick people who got into politics at a relatively young age. JFK was a Congressman at 29. LBJ was a Congressman at 28. Even Nixon, a historically young Republican nominee, was 33 when he became a Congressman.

Humphrey was 34 when he became Mayor. McGovern was 34 when he became Congressman. Carter was 38 when he became a state senator. Mondale was 31 when he became Minnesota Attorney General. Bill Clinton was 30 when elected Attorney General of Arkannsas, having failed a congressional bid two years earlier. Al Gore became a congressman at 28. John Kerry ran for Congress at 28. Obama became a state senator at 35.

I think it is a very good explanation. It makes sense that the most pro-business party has leaders who were businessmen before becoming politicians. And if they were businessmen, they could not start being politicians very early.

Chalenging an incumbent has no much relation to being youger, because in four of the last five elections, the candidate of the party trying to pick the White House was older than the candidate of the party trying to hold the White House.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.