Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 04:29:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Were the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki morally justified?  (Read 4002 times)
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,695
« on: August 03, 2015, 07:29:01 PM »
Not an easy question.

On one side, civilian population should not be target. On the other side, a land invasion would cost a much bigger number of lives.
Logged
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,695
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2015, 08:58:09 AM »
Good side of the nuclear weapons: no direct conflict between superpowers after 1945.
Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Yugoslavia and Afganistan are small countries.
Israel vs. Arabs is not a conflict between superpowers too.


Before 1945
30 years war
7 years war
Napoleonic wars
Crimean war
Franco Prussian war
Two world wars
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.