Welcome to the Runoff!: LA 2015 Liveblog (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 08:40:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Welcome to the Runoff!: LA 2015 Liveblog (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Welcome to the Runoff!: LA 2015 Liveblog  (Read 178096 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #50 on: November 21, 2015, 10:33:50 PM »

I wonder if Jindal will try and run for Senate lol

He said he wouldn't.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #51 on: November 21, 2015, 10:37:51 PM »

Edwards will probably kick it up to 56 or 57% considering most of what's left is Baton Rouge and New Orleans and they are 65% and 89% Edwards respectively.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #52 on: November 21, 2015, 10:40:07 PM »

John Kennedy (R) will probably run for Senate and win.

The primary between Kennedy and Angelle will be pretty rough.

If the AG race tells us anything, Kennedy being a former Democrat probably will be brought up again and again.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #53 on: November 21, 2015, 10:41:51 PM »

Ouachita and Jefferson are 50/50 right now.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #54 on: November 21, 2015, 10:53:52 PM »

Jefferson flipped to 51-49 Edwards with only two precincts left.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #55 on: November 21, 2015, 11:16:31 PM »


PATHETIC numbers in Metairie for Vitter. I didn't expect this much of a landslide.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #56 on: November 21, 2015, 11:55:46 PM »
« Edited: November 21, 2015, 11:57:20 PM by ElectionsGuy »

Did a quick 2012 Pres vs 2015 Gov in Paint using 50%, 60%, and 70% thresholds (non-atlas colors).

2012:



2015:

Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #57 on: November 22, 2015, 12:03:31 AM »

Final numbers with all precincts in:

Edwards: 646,860 (56.1%)
Vitter: 505,929 (43.9%)

Nungesser: 628,864 (55.4%)
Holden: 506,578 (44.6%)

Landry: 610,433 (56.3%)
Caldwell (inc.): 473,869 (43.7%)
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #58 on: November 22, 2015, 01:29:49 AM »

From 2012 to 2015, the largest swing by far was Cameron parish (74 points!). Its a small 90% white parish in Cajun country, so not as surprising but that's still huge. Other huge swings include Jefferson Davis (56.5) , Avoyelles (54.7), and Allen (51.5), all in Acadania. Parishes in and around the Baton Rouge area and Edwards' district were a hard swing as well. The areas with the least swing were the blackest parishes and many in the north, like Claiborne (17), Sabine (18), Union (19), etc. The north is the deepest south part of the state, so naturally the most polarized and inelastic.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #59 on: November 22, 2015, 04:44:51 PM »
« Edited: November 22, 2015, 04:47:00 PM by ElectionsGuy »

So the really amatuer map I made earlier in the thread is on the Wikipedia article for this race. No joke. lol, I feel famous right now Smiley
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #60 on: November 23, 2015, 07:24:00 AM »

So the really amatuer map I made earlier in the thread is on the Wikipedia article for this race. No joke. lol, I feel famous right now Smiley
Not anymore. Sorry, ElectionsGuy.

That's good. That was an awful map Tongue ^ Very nice county maps!
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #61 on: December 01, 2015, 06:03:02 AM »

Lots of gerrymandering in that map, but Edwards probably propelled some red-seat Democrats to victory.  Are there any instances where state senate Democrats actually outperformed Edwards in their districts (besides those running unopposed)?

While the district 20 area swung by far the most between the two elections, its not that surprising, considering how Republican they have gone in recent elections (~70%). I'm more surprised that parishes like Jefferson Davis and Allen voted for Edwards.

I wonder how white Catholics voted. Whites overall probably voted 37-38% for Edwards, but in some of those parishes Edwards may as well have won the white vote. I'm guessing 55-45 Vitter, while protestants were more like 75-25 Vitter.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #62 on: December 04, 2015, 08:37:40 PM »

That voter registration. Did a majority of independents still vote for Vitter, or are there still plenty of DINOs who voted for Vitter?

Looks like Edwards got just around 38% of the white vote with that racial makeup.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.