Libertarian Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 04:10:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Libertarian Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who do you support for the Libertarian nomination?
#1
Gary Johnson
#2
John McAfee
#3
Austin Peterson
#4
Darryl Perry
#5
Marc Allen Feldman
#6
Not a libertarian
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Libertarian Thread  (Read 8007 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« on: April 03, 2016, 09:55:49 PM »

Libertarian Party Poll - Who won the debate?

Petersen - 45%
Johnson - 23%
McAfee - 19%
Other - 13%

Three way:

Petersen - 51.5%
Johnson - 26.5%
McAfee - 22.0%

I tend to agree. I was disappointing with this debate, even though its just for Stossel's show. All the candidates seemed to have dramatic up and down moments of the debate, Johnson especially is just awkward in his speaking and seems like he never rehearsed or cared. Petersen is the Marco Rubio of the libertarian party presentation wise, and the most libertarian-lite of them all ideologically. He's the candidate that probably doesn't have the best policies but the one that is the most polished who seems very pragmatic and reasonable. McAfee is somewhat weird with his questioning of Stossel, definitely the one that could be casted as 'out there' or whatever, but very polished on some answers with good confidence. I would vote for all three of these guys so I don't mind who gets nominated, what I really want though is for the libertarian party to become much more high-profile than it has been. Its really sad seeing good alternatives being shut out by the corporate media. Its quite sad that this qualifies as an official 'forum' for a political party, and that previous debates that look like they were filmed in a potato and get 88 views on Youtube. Things really need to change...
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2016, 11:08:55 PM »

https://www.lp.org/poll/who-won-the-libertarian-presidential-debate-on-stossel

^^ The poll is actually from the libertarian party itself. Other is just what I combined as all the other silly options on there, that's why I did the three way. As to why Johnson did better than McAfee, maybe party insider bias? Don't know. I do think this is the worst I've seen of Johnson speech wise.

It would be be magnificent to have Ron Paul run as a libertarian, one can dream.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2016, 07:36:04 PM »

Fox News, MSNBC, CNN need to start vetting for national Libertarian debates on TV. It's the only way more people get exposed to an alternative 3rd party to the GOP and DEMs.

The problem is that will never happen. Big media is funded by special interests of the two major parties that want to lock out any alternative opposition.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2016, 07:43:07 PM »

Yeah, I'm not going to lie, one of my least favorite moments was Petersen's Penny Plan advocacy. It's just too terribly simplistic and doesn't do enough to cut spending.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2016, 01:52:28 PM »

I think Johnson did better this time and kind of redeemed himself a bit, but still had a few hesitant and akward answers which he needs to work on. Still, definitely better for him, no clear winner this time in my opinion. From watching these debates, I can now sort of classify these candidates: McAfee is your 'true libertarian' with deep philosophical thinking, Petersen is pretty ideological but also has a bit more of a conservative and constitutional bent to him, and Johnson is the most pragmatic, perhaps skeptical of purity while still being libertarian enough, of the three.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.