Inks.LWC v. Senate of Atlasia (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 08:21:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Inks.LWC v. Senate of Atlasia (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Inks.LWC v. Senate of Atlasia  (Read 1177 times)
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


« on: February 05, 2014, 02:16:47 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I would urge the honorable Court to dismiss the case on the grounds that no legitimate reading of the constitution could yield a specific chronology which the Senate must follow. I would also note that the Consent process is not burdened by the Specificity; that specific clause refers to the compact itself which must be bound by mentioning the handling of "Specific Issues". 
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2014, 09:40:30 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Noted! May I file such a brief via public post in this thread?
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2014, 08:28:06 PM »

I will just keep it simple.

Is there value to hearing this case?

In a word, no. If the court rules in favor of Inks, regional merger negotiations will continue. If they receive the proper support, the approved negotiations would prompt a Senate vote. If the court does not rule in favor of Inks, regional merger negotiations will continue. If it receives the proper support, the merger will occur.

The only reason to hear this case is political, since the only difference in outcome would be to have the Senate forced to approve the finalized merger. As such, the only difference would entail a difference in the composition of the Senate, a political process. It would take a great deal of judicial activism, thus, to grant cert, as the court would essentially be tacitly approving a politicization of the process by a party, who, in the classical sense of the term, lacks standing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.