Should the US Subsidize Pharmacy Companies? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:49:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Should the US Subsidize Pharmacy Companies? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should We Continue?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author Topic: Should the US Subsidize Pharmacy Companies?  (Read 1006 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,433
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
« on: August 19, 2016, 11:15:17 PM »

I wasn't aware we subsidized Walgreen's, Rite-Aid or CVS.  That said, ending our paying for the R&D of the pharmaceutical companies while other countries don't is something we need to address and have for a long time.

CVS at least is. I work for a CVS branch that is funded by the government.

And to answer the question, if the R&D isn't subsidized, we'll just end up paying for it some other way. Either through when Medicare/Medicaid pays over a $1000/pill for new drugs because that's the only way the company can possibly make a profit before generics hit the market and undercut it, or in subsidizing insurance companies to do the same thing. This is a sector of the economy where the old mantra of "let the free market take care of it!" simply won't work, unless patent laws are changed drastically, in which case there would be a far bigger threat from the Martin Shkrelis of the world.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,433
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2016, 04:19:28 PM »

I wasn't aware we subsidized Walgreen's, Rite-Aid or CVS.  That said, ending our paying for the R&D of the pharmaceutical companies while other countries don't is something we need to address and have for a long time.

CVS at least is. I work for a CVS branch that is funded by the government.

And to answer the question, if the R&D isn't subsidized, we'll just end up paying for it some other way. Either through when Medicare/Medicaid pays over a $1000/pill for new drugs because that's the only way the company can possibly make a profit before generics hit the market and undercut it, or in subsidizing insurance companies to do the same thing. This is a sector of the economy where the old mantra of "let the free market take care of it!" simply won't work, unless patent laws are changed drastically, in which case there would be a far bigger threat from the Martin Shkrelis of the world.

Are you referring to a physical CVS pharmacy location, or to Caremark, the pharmacy benefit management company that CVS owns and that provides PBM to some federal health insurance programs?

Caremark. More specifically I handle claims and formulary exceptions for some of their Medicare Part D plans.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.