The Cris Plan - 5 Regions and Bicameralism (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 05:07:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The Cris Plan - 5 Regions and Bicameralism (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Cris Plan - 5 Regions and Bicameralism  (Read 784 times)
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« on: August 27, 2014, 09:19:25 AM »
« edited: May 24, 2015, 01:26:30 AM by Senator Cris »

The Bicameral Birthing Amendment, that was approved by the Senate, has failed the regions vote, with 2 regions (IDS and Midwest) that approved the Amendment and with 2 regions (Northeast and Pacific) that haven't approved the Amendment. The Mideast is voting on the Amendment.
There may be many reasons to vote against the Amendment, and I think that the most important is the fact that the Amendment approved by the Senate provides the consolidations of regions, with 3 new regions, compared to the current 5 regions.
I have a plan that permits to have 5 regions and bicameralism. My plan provides:

- 5 Regions.
- 5 Senators, one elected by each region.
- 11 Representatives of a new House elected by Districts or At-Large.

This plan, apparently, provides 59 Office Holders, with a gain of 6 Office Holders, that is too big for Atlasia. But with a change on the regions structures, we can have a gain between 0 and 2 Office Holders.

My proposal about the Regions structures provides:

- The Midwest should continue to have 5 Office Holders (Governor, Archduke and 3 Representatives).
- The Pacific should continue to have 5 Office Holders (Governor, Justice and 3 Counciliors).
- The Mideast should have 6 Office Holders, instead of current 8 (Governor, Lt. Governor, Justice and 3 Assemblymen).
- The Northeast should have 5 or 6 Office Holders, instead of current 7 (Governor, CJO and 3/4 Representatives)
- The IDS should have 5 or 6 Office Holders, instead of current 7 (Emperor, Judicial and 3/4 Legislators).

So, the new situation of Office Holders would be:

Senate --> 5 (current 10)
House --> 11 (current 0)
Cabinet --> 8 (current 8 )
Court --> 3 (current 3)
Regions --> 26/28 (current 32)

Total --> 53/54/55 (current 53) (Gain of 0/1/2)

The text of my proposal would be the same approved by the Senate, without the passage on the consolidation, because the change in the number of regional Office Holders should be competence of the Mideast, Northeast and IDS.

What do you think?
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2014, 10:42:39 AM »


Sorry Tongue
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2014, 11:27:25 AM »

A Senate with only 5 members would be incredibly boring.
The Bicameral Birting Amendment provides a Senate with 6 members. The difference is of 1 member. But this difference can be decisive in terms of boring.
Logged
Senator Cris
Cris
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,613
Italy


« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2014, 12:01:33 PM »

Why is that these ideas never do the decent thing and die after being rejected? Sad
I think that the Amendment approved by the Senate is a good idea and I have voted Aye in the Referendum. I'm only proposing a new plan, that is the same approved by the Senate, except the number of regions and the number of Senators.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.