Vietnam War: Win, Lose, or Draw for America? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 05:42:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Vietnam War: Win, Lose, or Draw for America? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Vietnam War
#1
American win
 
#2
American draw
 
#3
American loss
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 64

Author Topic: Vietnam War: Win, Lose, or Draw for America?  (Read 8313 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,940
United Kingdom


« on: March 17, 2015, 08:08:19 PM »

A win for the US population's ability to make themselves heard, a defeat for the Pentagon.
The "Pentagon" is a tool the politicians use.  Blaming the "Pentagon" for Vietnam is like blaming the gun for murder.


We won every major battle, had a very good kill:death ratio despite the sh**tty conditions (the military was designed, at the point the war started, to fight on the open fields of Europe, not the jungles of southeast Asia) and left on our own terms.  A win?  well no, obviously not as we didn't reach our goals, but I've got a hard time calling it a loss.

You didn't win every major battle http://www.g2mil.com/lost_vietnam.htm

By your logic the war of independence was a draw for the UK right? We weren't trained to fight there, we had a good kill:death ratio despite the sh**tty conditions (no-one likes Boston) and we left on our own terms?

If your claiming Vietnam, I'm claiming the WOI
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,940
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2015, 02:24:00 AM »

I'm assuming Deadman was one of the two tie votes, but who the hell voted "win"? And why oh why? Huh
I didn't vote.
A win for the US population's ability to make themselves heard, a defeat for the Pentagon.
The "Pentagon" is a tool the politicians use.  Blaming the "Pentagon" for Vietnam is like blaming the gun for murder.


We won every major battle, had a very good kill:death ratio despite the sh**tty conditions (the military was designed, at the point the war started, to fight on the open fields of Europe, not the jungles of southeast Asia) and left on our own terms.  A win?  well no, obviously not as we didn't reach our goals, but I've got a hard time calling it a loss.

You didn't win every major battle http://www.g2mil.com/lost_vietnam.htm

By your logic the war of independence was a draw for the UK right? We weren't trained to fight there, we had a good kill:death ratio despite the sh**tty conditions (no-one likes Boston) and we left on our own terms?

If your claiming Vietnam, I'm claiming the WOI

I said "major".  I didn't read every line from your link, but the 20ish I read were all fairly minor (at best).  You seemed to also miss the part where I said we didn't win.

I totally understand why it's considered a loss, it's just not a clean loss.


(and besides the points you made, the UK "lost" that war for some of the same reasons the US "lost" Vietnam, the people at home lost the will to fight a war that they didn't see much point in fighting and it was managed poorly by politicos an ocean away)

So then the war of Independence wasn't a clean loss? Wicked.

Does this look like anything but a loss?

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.