Should Terri Schiavo's feeding tube have been removed? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 08:06:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Should Terri Schiavo's feeding tube have been removed? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes (D)
 
#2
No (D)
 
#3
Yes (R)
 
#4
No (R)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 70

Author Topic: Should Terri Schiavo's feeding tube have been removed?  (Read 2490 times)
Potus
Potus2036
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,841


« on: December 20, 2015, 12:45:49 PM »

No. For one thing, we don't convict people of felonies without the unanimous consent of interested parties, the jury. The family was divided about what to do and people are willing to allow a hospital to starve a woman to death.

I don't understand why those who support suicide for the sick would ever want to be associated with the removal of a feeding tube. This wasn't a case of 'painless' euthanasia like they typically defend. This is starving a woman to death.

I'm not quite sure when people think Terri lost her right to be alive, that's a view I would like to see answered by everyone voting in the affirmative.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.