Which of these two statements about foreign policy do you agree with more? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:10:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Which of these two statements about foreign policy do you agree with more? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Ur chose
#1
Statement 1		  
#2
Statement 2		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 47

Author Topic: Which of these two statements about foreign policy do you agree with more?  (Read 2175 times)
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,398
United States


P P P
« on: October 02, 2015, 08:03:10 PM »
Quote from: Carpetbagger on October 02, 2015, 03:47:48 PM
Option 1 would lead to less bloodshed.
I doubt the United States following a "pragmatic" policy of propping up murderous dictators when it's in their strategic interests to do so (i.e. Pinochet, Suharto, Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, the Saudi Royal Family, Apartheid South Africa, Ngo Dinh Diem, the Shah of Iran, etc.) is going to result in any less bloodshed than "idealistic" nation building.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.