Election Analysis of Dean v Bush (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 06:57:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Election Analysis of Dean v Bush (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Election Analysis of Dean v Bush  (Read 4465 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« on: January 01, 2004, 06:49:59 PM »

I've been working on analyzing how a race between Dean and Bush would shape up.

The data and predictions were made in October, so it's a little bit out of date currently. I've begun a second, more indepth look at the numbers which will probably be completed in a month or so.

The analysis is available at:
http://www.geocities.com/electionanalysis/dean.html
Great analysis!
A few things:
I don't see how dean has a 12% lead in Maine or California.  California went Gore by about that much in 2000, and maine was undecided for a long time on election night...
Also, I think George W. Bush wouldhave about a 65-70% chance of beating Dean.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2004, 06:52:16 PM »

Dean would Win for Democarts & Bush wins for Repblicans & Bush leads in Polls in states like Pennsvillan, Minnestoa, Iowa & Other Place & Bush wins it
Pennsvillan!!!!
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2004, 10:40:30 PM »

http://www.worldandi.com/public/1992/june/cr6.cfm

That shows how an upset can be pulled off.  some people had Clinton finishing third in the 1992 Election behind Bush and Perot.

Nader running as an independent means that he isn't on the ballot in as many states, which is good.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2004, 10:52:14 PM »

92 was just plain crazy.  Perot the day he announced he quit before jumping back in was AHEAD!!  Then he blasted Bush as he left and bragged up Clinton.  It was widely reported that Clinton didn't think he could win when he started running he was just trying to get his name out there for 1996.  But then Perot came in attacking Bush and Clinton soared with Perot taking enough of Bush's supporters and original democrats seeing the opportunity left Perot and returned to the dem nominee which was then Clinton.

This should be a what if question.  If perot didn't drop out and just ran straight up, how would he have done.  He got 19% then and he was jumping in and out and picked a WEAK running mate to get ont he ballot in some states.  Always wondered what it would have been like, and if he could have thrown it into the House at least, as if I remember right he finished 2d in some states.


http://www.worldandi.com/public/1992/june/cr6.cfm

That shows how an upset can be pulled off.  some people had Clinton finishing third in the 1992 Election behind Bush and Perot.

Nader running as an independent means that he isn't on the ballot in as many states, which is good.
He finished second in Maine and the news station had him in the elad for a while there, although they called it for Clinton around midnight.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2004, 10:59:31 PM »

just made a 1992 what if scenario in the Presidential history forum to talk about this.
Good!  I'll be there!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.