New Tradesports rankings (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:04:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  New Tradesports rankings (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Author Topic: New Tradesports rankings  (Read 185657 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #125 on: February 22, 2008, 05:30:32 PM »

Democratic Rest of Field is up to 3.6 on IEM.  odd.

Hoping for a brokered convention, I guess.

or the scenario opebo outlined in the other thread.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #126 on: February 26, 2008, 03:22:37 PM »

How can they be so confident Obama will win RI?

the Obama Rhode Island stock collapsed after the Rasmussen poll came out showing Clinton up double digits.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #127 on: March 02, 2008, 10:55:42 PM »

Al Gore now has a 150% chance of winning the election if nominated.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #128 on: March 02, 2008, 11:00:23 PM »

the most likely scenario for Gore winning without being nominated involves Obama being assassinated in September or October and Democrats replacing him with Gore on the ballot.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #129 on: March 05, 2008, 10:04:17 PM »

Clinton and Obama surge in Dem VP market, presumably due to Hillary's comment.

Obama 16.8 (meaning, the market gives him a greater than 50% chance of being VP if he is not nominated for president)
Webb 10.2
Clinton 10.0
Clark 6.5
Richardson 6.2
Gore 5.1
...
Field 40.0
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #130 on: March 08, 2008, 12:26:29 PM »

Intrade (the new name for Tradesports) punters think that Clinton is more electable than Obama. My take is that they are both massively overvalued.

extrapolating the winning individual vs. nomination winner isn't very useful.  Gore has been over 100% to win the general if nominated for a while now.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #131 on: March 20, 2008, 07:14:36 PM »

Democratic nomination
Obama 73.2
Clinton 26.5
Gore 2.5 (stock is on fire)
Edwards 0.3

Republican nomination
McCain 95.0
Paul 1.9
Giuliani 1.6
Romney 0.8
Huckabee 0.6
Rice 0.4
Gingrich 0.2
Thompson 0.1

Winning party
Democratic 60.2
Republican 41.0
Field 1.0

Winning Individual
Obama 41.4
McCain 39.8
Clinton 18.5
Gore 2.3
Paul 0.7
Bloomberg 0.4
Giuliani 0.2
Romney 0.2
Huckabee 0.1
Edwards 0.1
Field 0.1
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #132 on: March 23, 2008, 11:56:53 AM »

if they were 'lagging indicators' McCain would be favored to win the presidency right now.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #133 on: March 23, 2008, 12:05:08 PM »

if they were 'lagging indicators' McCain would be favored to win the presidency right now.

Because of the Wright affair?

because he leads Obama and Clinton in nearly every national poll.

--

Gore at 3.0 to win the Democratic nomination, btw.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #134 on: March 29, 2008, 12:54:41 PM »

Democratic nomination
Obama 80.1
Clinton 18.1
Gore 4.0
Edwards 0.2

Republican nomination
McCain 95.0
Giuliani 1.7
Paul 1.5
Romney 1.1
Rice 0.7
Huckabee 0.5
Gingrich 0.3
Thompson 0.2

Winning party
Democratic 59.3
Republican 38.0
Field 0.7

Winning Individual
Obama 47.9
McCain 39.6
Clinton 11.5
Gore 2.5
Paul 0.4
Bloomberg 0.3
Giuliani 0.2
Romney 0.2
Huckabee 0.1
Edwards 0.1
Field 0.1
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #135 on: March 29, 2008, 01:06:47 PM »

Republican nomination
McCain 95.0
Giuliani 1.7
Paul 1.5
Romney 1.1
Rice 0.7
Huckabee 0.5
Gingrich 0.3
Thompson 0.2

Um, why is McCain still below 100.0? Do some assume that he could die of old age prior to the convention or what?

or scandal or assassination or incapacitation.  all of those little probabilities add up to around 5%.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #136 on: March 30, 2008, 04:41:52 PM »

Democratic nomination
Obama 80.0
Clinton 17.3
Gore 4.8
Edwards 0.2

Republican nomination
McCain 94.1
Giuliani 1.7
Paul 1.5
Romney 1.4
Rice 0.5
Huckabee 0.5
Gingrich 0.3
Thompson 0.2

Winning party
Democratic 59.3
Republican 38.0
Field 0.7

Winning Individual
Obama 47.4
McCain 39.7
Clinton 12.1
Gore 4.5
Paul 0.6
Bloomberg 0.3
Giuliani 0.3
Romney 0.3
Edwards 0.2
Huckabee 0.1
Field 0.1
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #137 on: March 30, 2008, 04:43:19 PM »

Iowa Electronic Markets numbers...



Obama 79.1
Clinton 16.7
Rest of Field 3.6
Edwards 0.1
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #138 on: June 13, 2008, 12:45:52 AM »

hilarious new stock:

NEW.REP.VP.CLINTON

current bid is 0.1 and ask is 3.0.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 13 queries.