Cousin marriage (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 03:25:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Cousin marriage (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Cousin marriage  (Read 2839 times)
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,359
Kiribati


« on: October 08, 2014, 03:30:45 PM »

Rules against cousin marriage made sense when people were largely limited to isolated populations. Then, generation after generation of intra-family copulation would result in a horrifically shallow gene pool. See: much of the British Pakistani diaspora, the "village idiot" phenomena. A crude ban makes sense in that case.

However, now  the vast majority of us live in large and non-insular populations, the bans are useless. One pair of cousins marrying and producing offspring are practically just as likely to produce healthy children as non-related couples (OK, we have a slight increase in risk; but that's not enough reason to force the government to "regulate the gene pool", something I frown upon for obvious reasons). It's repeated

(Incidentally, I think it would be gross; but whatevs)
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,359
Kiribati


« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2014, 05:51:14 PM »


I did. While the second one is more consistent, there is of course this, which is not really arguable:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It wasn't the best example, but I was hunting a .edu.

I find it most interesting that there is very likely an evolutionary impulse against inbreeding, which would make a lot of sense.

In any event, no one is going to convince me at this point in time that inbreeding is not harmful, so we probably just won't agree on it. Tongue

OK ... so even if you are shown direct scientific evidence you won't change your mind, because you really want not to believe it; to the extent you'll hunt down evidence and shoehorn it to your beliefs? Fair enough, I guess; but pretty much all the evidence suggests that inbreeding is only really dangerous to gene pools if it is widespread and repeated. Even if evolution "doesn't like" organisms inbreeding, nature considers it better than extinction so early humans almost constantly inbred (we are all inbred to some extent, your parents family trees almost certainly cross multiple times).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.