Should Online Gambling Be Completely Legalized? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 10:38:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Should Online Gambling Be Completely Legalized? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Legalize?
#1
Yes (R/Muh unfettered Capitalism)
 
#2
No (R/Muh Morals)
 
#3
Yes (D/Muh unrestricted freedom)
 
#4
No (D/Nanny Stater looking out for those who don't act in their own self-interest)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 59

Author Topic: Should Online Gambling Be Completely Legalized?  (Read 2157 times)
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,359
Kiribati


« on: August 01, 2015, 06:01:27 PM »

Aren't those sites basically just quick ways to launder cash?

And I don't really know. Obviously the business model is basically exploitation (as is those silly FarmVille games) of those with more cash than sense, so I can hardly see what the benefit of them being completely legal is. At least with casinos you get some local employment out of it. I'm leaning towards many stater, mainly to counter the yawn-worthy "freedom!!" Argument.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,359
Kiribati


« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2015, 07:05:39 PM »

Perhaps there is a windfall of taxes to be raised from online gambling. But even if local governments don't immediately fritter away such a landfall on something dumb, I feel uneasy. At the moment in the UK, one of the few successes of the recession (in addition to the pawnbrokers and the quick loan companies) we betting shops. I've got nothing against them in particular, but like many industries they are designed to exploit the vulnerable. In particular the FOBT machines are a huge draw (I understand Australia has a huge problem with them). People will sit at these machines for hours and hours, hoping to grab the jackpot. And in theory its great. Business execs get a raise, the profits rise and the government takes some cream off the top to engorge itself on. But we see from the evidence that this profit doesn't come evenly from casual gamers. No, it sucks from a significant minority of problem gamers. The people who will game and game till the cows come home. Who cares right? People should have the freedom to bankrupt themselves.

Well, sure, but no man is an island. Families are broken up. People become despondent, and even entire communities can suffer because of epidemics of problem gaming. And now, it has become an established business, so nobody - not the government with its newfound reliance on gambling taxes (a chief issue with sin taxes) - can do anything.

Gambling, like Zynga, is just one industry that relies on exploitation. Perhaps if I was being sage, every business model in some capacity is exploitative and I'm making a mountain of a molehill. But I refuse to be cavalier about the gambling industry, whatever I think of gambling as a practise (which ftr I enjoy). Gambling ruins lives (in fact to be profitable, it invariably has to rely on addicts), and an economy reliant on such industries is very often toxic. Gambling is invariably linked with organised crime and money laundering operations no matter how regulated it is. I still don't know what should be done about it, but really the whole business makes me very nervous.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,359
Kiribati


« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2015, 06:49:34 PM »

The key word is industry, brtd. I don't give two craps about invididuals gambling, it's really their won perogative. It's the business model I find objectionable, as it is one based on exploitation.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.