Racial divide on Ferguson indictment is almost identical to 2014 House vote (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 03:48:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Racial divide on Ferguson indictment is almost identical to 2014 House vote (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Racial divide on Ferguson indictment is almost identical to 2014 House vote  (Read 6252 times)
GaussLaw
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,279
« on: December 04, 2014, 08:35:49 PM »



Im asian and most of my circle is mainly asian, make it 75% for approval of the grand jury's decision.


Being on the sidelines from the racial politics, a lot more of us have read the evidence and taken the events as a whole instead of taking one piece for racial agitation.


The 25% that don't are usually hard left/liberal/progressive holdouts who have decided to ignore the evidence in order to be social justice warriors.






Also the only education group that disapproves of the decision by net per net, is those with high school education or less.

I'm a little surprised by the "College Degree" vote being that strongly in favor of Ferguson's lack of indictment.  Is there a reason why less educated white moderates/conservatives are more sympathetic to Brown than those w/ degrees?
Logged
GaussLaw
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,279
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2014, 11:13:06 PM »


I'm a little surprised by the "College Degree" vote being that strongly in favor of Ferguson's lack of indictment.  Is there a reason why less educated white moderates/conservatives are more sympathetic to Brown than those w/ degrees?

Another factor in the education data that mirrors the political data is the fall-off in support for those with advanced degrees. It is observed that the most reliable Pubs by education are those with a bachelors degree, but not a masters or higher. Those who got post-baccalaureate degrees are the only group of white registered voters by education (Pew 2012) who favor Dems (D+8), compared to those with a college degree (R+7), some college (R+12) and HS or less (R+9).

I thought that the "Some College" group is the most reliably Republican of the educational cohorts (at least, in recent years).

Indeed.  This is why I was so surprised by how strongly the Bachelor's degree group broke against Michael Brown/in favor of Darrel Wilson.  Presumably this is because more minorities get an associates degree/some college compared to whites, but that number looks awfully high for those with a bachelor's compared to the "some college" group.
Logged
GaussLaw
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,279
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2014, 11:34:16 PM »

So Democrats are rioting and burning down their own commercial districts and economic opportunities. Tell us something we didn't already know.

 is a microcosm. Democratic voters can only rage, and give world-class amateur productions of Les Miserable. Republicans sit in the audience with their popcorn buckets and evaluate the individual performances.

Sharpton could use some , imo.

99% of the rioting vandals arern't registered voters.


Your 'politics' really are just a pretext for fundamental character flaws.

Please stop making grotesque posts which embarrass the rest of blue .

Truth.  AggregateDemand is the cancer of southern blue avatars, making us respectable ones like me, Yankee, and Del Tachi look bad.
Logged
GaussLaw
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,279
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2014, 09:20:34 PM »

Truth.  AggregateDemand is the cancer of southern blue avatars, making us respectable ones like me, Yankee, and Del Tachi look bad.

You guys believe that once you disperse the crowds, the circumstances that led to the rioting will also disappear. Truth is that some of you are dumber than the Democrats who support property destruction and violence against police as a means of demonstrating.

Blue avatar stands for competence, not propriety and piousness. You see all of these people wrecking their own towns and stealing as a means of acquiring modest amenities? They exist because you let the Donkeys run roughshod over the lower middle classes, and they persist because you're not willing to fix any problem that creates moral ambiguity or challenges your narrow interpretation of moral propriety. You're like a bunch of missionaries who worry about the damage to their reputation if someone sees them witnessing at a whore house.

The orange and green avatars know more about the depths of Democratic depravity than you clowns. They incorrectly identify it as neoliberalism, but at least they can see it.

Could you please clarify that using more simple language?  What do you mean by "moral ambiguity" and what have you actually proposed to help these people?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.