A good dude, if regrettably as the alternate timelines have proven time and time again prioritized the few hot-button social issues of the left over the big picture ones and the economics (why else would a leftist Democrat to this day ever vote for Birch Bayh over Terry Sanford, why else would you vote for a Kennedy over Muskie?).
?
SKIP
Also without a defined stance on foreign policy beyond a disgust for the Iraq War, so I guess this makes him a textbook California liberal.
Erhm, I hope you do realize one of my schticks is focusing on "bread and butter" issues over social issues (hence why I'm a strong supporter of New Deal Democrats such as FDR himself, Truman, Humphrey, and H. Jackson) while I'm relatively conservative on social issues-being strongly pro-life for instance. I'm not sure what alternate timeline elections you are talking about. As for foreign policy,my posts generally implied support for liberal internationalism.
I do, but I guess given my own more polarized and cynical outlook, it looks that way, especially regarding intervention (most Atlasians) vs non-intervention (where my leanings are, and the Marxists epitomize). And given the complete Teddy support.
On Sawx: Someone who interrupted my post on Jerry, nice going!
Okay seriously, he's a very very "liberal and proud of it" poster, but he seems to be very polite and open.
On LeBron: Someone who interrupted my post on Sawx, excellently done!
And once again, same description I gave Sawx, although he tends to get more carried away about it, and his posts tend to have a lot of Ohio patriotism.
