Why the 2004 election and 2012 election were really similer (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:49:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why the 2004 election and 2012 election were really similer (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why the 2004 election and 2012 election were really similer  (Read 2778 times)
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,431
United States


« on: April 23, 2015, 04:51:46 PM »
Quote from: Senator Blair on April 23, 2015, 04:29:52 PM
Quote from: tara gilesbie on March 22, 2015, 11:56:09 AM
Quote from: Polls_PuffPass on March 20, 2015, 07:41:50 PM
Quote from: Clarko95 on March 20, 2015, 07:22:18 PM
Quote from: ModerateVoter on March 20, 2015, 06:31:14 PM
Both challengers were from Massachusetts too.
America does not like rich white male politicians from Massachusetts with slick hair Tongue
JFK

Well, no, given he probably won because of vote fraud...

I'm calling bollocks on this, after actually researching it the 'JFK brought the election' idea is largely based on outdated smears about his father, and there's a reason the nixon campaign didn't want a recount-plenty of evidence that Nixon's side was up for some dodgy antics

That explains California.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.