Hillary blames DNC for loss, credits Obama's looks for breaking racial barrier ! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 08:08:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Hillary blames DNC for loss, credits Obama's looks for breaking racial barrier ! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Hillary blames DNC for loss, credits Obama's looks for breaking racial barrier !  (Read 3136 times)
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,444
United States


« on: June 03, 2017, 05:43:07 PM »


God the leftist in this thread are insufferable. 

And Hillbots are still in denial. Everybody's responsible but Her Majesty.
Dude she was not the best candidate, but the sh**ting on her by you bros is pretty tiring.  Nothing better for you guys to do?  Can a woman not talk about her loss, or does she have to move on, unlike the men who either punted on the primaries or lost them by a landslide?

What makes her more special than Al Gore again? I missed it.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,444
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2017, 05:57:47 PM »


Why must Hillbots always shoot the messenger? Shadows is a low-quality poster, sure, but how is this thread "spam"? Are people not supposed to report on an ex-Presidential candidate giving her (delusional) thoughts about why she lost in a public setting?

What X said. This nearly identical thread has been made at least 10 times by Shadows in particular, and the posts that populate these threads are the exact same people hand-wringing over and over again. Why people care so much about a losing politician who will never run for anything ever again is beyond me.

Uh, probably because she's still a vocal figure whose statements are covered by national media? Huh

Wow, it's her fault that you have to bitch and moan at everything she has to say. 

You are such a petulant child. Criticizing what a public official has to say isn't tantamount to "having to bitch and moan at everything" she says. I really hope she's paying you to defend her honor like this.

Of course it isn't, but that's not what you do.  You bitch and moan at everything Hillary says and while much of it is awful, it doesn't matter either.  Literally no one cares about the 2016 primaries anymore except for fringe Berniecrats like yourself and maybe Hillary.

Tell that to the fringe Hillbots and JerryARs here.



Why must Hillbots always shoot the messenger? Shadows is a low-quality poster, sure, but how is this thread "spam"? Are people not supposed to report on an ex-Presidential candidate giving her (delusional) thoughts about why she lost in a public setting?

What X said. This nearly identical thread has been made at least 10 times by Shadows in particular, and the posts that populate these threads are the exact same people hand-wringing over and over again. Why people care so much about a losing politician who will never run for anything ever again is beyond me.

Uh, probably because she's still a vocal figure whose statements are covered by national media? Huh

Wow, it's her fault that you have to bitch and moan at everything she has to say.  

You are such a petulant child. Criticizing what a public official has to say isn't tantamount to "having to bitch and moan at everything" she says. I really hope she's paying you to defend her honor like this.
Yet in every thread on her, you and others continue to post the same talking points, the same sh**t over and over again.  Yeah, that looks like bitching to me.


God the leftist in this thread are insufferable.  

And Hillbots are still in denial. Everybody's responsible but Her Majesty.
Dude she was not the best candidate, but the sh**ting on her by you bros is pretty tiring.  Nothing better for you guys to do?  Can a woman not talk about her loss, or does she have to move on, unlike the men who either punted on the primaries or lost them by a landslide?

What makes her more special than Al Gore again? I missed it.
We never heard this sh**t regarding Gore, he was never asked to step back to the same degree as she has been.

Because he knew better, he knew after all that fuss that anything else would just make things worse.

Can't tell someone to step back if they've already done so.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,444
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2017, 02:24:48 AM »

Having said that, I am not sure that Obama's "looks" was the key thing for him to break the racial barrier. He was a fabulous orator & had innate charm & charisma & so did Bill Clinton for that matter. (you may disagree with him on policies or governance). It is probably less to do with looks & more to with the whole "personality" & "oratory".

And who would've noted any of that without the looks, youth, and general lack of drama anyway?

Did not Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson also have some charisma and good oration? And yet, because they were old and more fiery, they came off as grievance candidates.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.